Stefan M. Herzog | Lightnews

Stefan Herzog

@stefanherzog.bsky.social

3.3K followers 1K following 190 posts

Senior Researcher @arc-mpib.bsky.social MaxPlanck @mpib-berlin.bsky.social, group leader #BOOSTING decisions: cognitive science, AI/collective intelligence, behavioral public policy, comput. social science, misinfo; stefanherzog.org scienceofboosting.org .. more

Videos

Computer science 20%

Business 13%

Posts Replies Media Videos

Pinned

Stefan Herzog @stefanherzog.bsky.social · Jan 23

🌟🧠💪📝
#BOOSTING: Empowering citizens with behavioral science

New, freely available paper in Annual Review of Psychology.
PDF: tinyurl.com/boosting2025

For more: scienceofboosting.org

@arc-mpib.bsky.social @mpib-berlin.bsky.social

@annualreviews.bsky.social
#policy #behavioralscience

1/ 🧵👇

The image is the cover page of an article from the "Annual Review of Psychology" titled "Boosting: Empowering Citizens with Behavioral Science" by Stefan M. Herzog and Ralph Hertwig. It features a brief abstract, keywords, and publication details. The abstract outlines the concept of "boosting" as a behavioral public policy that emphasizes empowering individuals to make informed decisions, in contrast to "nudging," which subtly steers behavior. The abstract reads:

Behavioral public policy came to the fore with the introduction of nudging, which aims to steer behavior while maintaining freedom of choice. Responding to critiques of nudging (e.g., that it does not promote agency and relies on benevolent choice architects), other behavioral policy approaches focus on empowering citizens. Here we review boosting, a behavioral policy approach that aims to foster people's agency, self-control, and ability to make informed decisions. It is grounded in evidence from behavioral science showing that human decision making is not as notoriously flawed as the nudging approach assumes. We argue that addressing the challenges of our time—such as climate change, pandemics, and the threats to liberal democracies and human autonomy posed by digital technologies and choice architectures—calls for fostering capable and engaged citizens as a first line of response to complement slower, systemic approaches.

List with summary points:

1. Behavioral public policy garnered widespread attention with the introduction of nudging, which aims to steer behavior while maintaining freedom of choice.
2. Criticisms of nudging include that it does not promote agency and competences and that it relies—overly optimistically—on the presence of benevolent choice architects.
3. The proliferation of environments threatening people's autonomy, the slow pace of systemic approaches to tackling societal issues, and the intrinsic benefits of empowerment make empowering citizens an indispensable objective of behavioral public policy.
4. Boosting is a behavioral public policy approach to empowerment grounded in evidence from behavioral science that shows that humans’ boundedly rational decision making is not as flawed as the nudging approach assumes.
5. Boosts are interventions that improve people's competencies to make informed choices that conform to their goals, preferences, and desires.
6. In self-nudging boosts, people learn to use architectural changes in their proximate choice environment to regulate their own behavior—that is, they are empowered to adapt their own choice environments.
7. There are boosts to foster core competences in many domains, including finance, online environments, and health, as well as broader, overarching areas, such as motivation, risk, and judgment and decision making. Boosts should be part of a policy mix that also includes system-level approaches.
8. When implementing boosts, policy makers need to avoid the trap of individualizing responsibility and to be mindful that, due to differences in cognition and motivation, inequalities in the desirable effects across boosted individuals may emerge.

Reposted by Stefan M. Herzog

Vito Trianni @vitotrianni.bsky.social · 6d

🧵 webinar announcement
1/
How can we combine human and machine intelligence to make better medical diagnoses? 🧠🤖
Join HACID and @HumanDx on Nov 12, 17:30 CET for a special webinar on Hybrid Human-AI Collective Intelligence in Medical Diagnostics.
🔗 events.teams.microsoft.com/event/8e607b...

Photo by Antoni Shkraba Studio: https://www.pexels.com/photo/doctors-examining-an-x-ray-image-on-a-laptop-5214994/

Reposted by Stefan M. Herzog, Jens Rommel

Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 25d

Gambetta & Origgi on the LL Game, in which agents prefer to deliver and receive (!) low quality.

This paper is absolutely savage but also feels uncomfortably relevant to parts of academia outside of Italy 👀

diegogambetta.org/wp-content/u...

Abstract
We investigate a phenomenon which we have experienced as common when dealing
with an assortment of Italian public and private institutions: people promise to exchange
high-quality goods and services, but then something goes wrong and the quality delivered
is lower than had been promised. While this is perceived as ‘cheating’ by outsiders,
insiders seem not only to adapt to, but to rely on this outcome. They do not resent
low-quality exchanges; in fact, they seem to resent high-quality ones, and are inclined
to put pressure on or avoid dealing with agents who deliver high quality. The equilibrium
among low-quality producers relies on an unusual preference ranking which differs from
that associated with the Prisoners’ Dilemma and similar games, whereby self-interested
rational agents prefer to dish out low quality in exchange for high quality. While equally
‘lazy’, agents in our low-quality worlds are oddly ‘pro-social’: for the advantage of
maximizing their raw self-interest, they prefer to receive low-quality goods and services,
provided that they too can in exchange deliver low quality without embarrassment. They
develop a set of oblique social norms to sustain their preferred equilibrium when threatened by the intrusion of high quality. We argue that high-quality collective outcomes are
endangered not only by self-interested individual defectors, but by ‘cartels’ of mutually
satisfied mediocrities.

Reposted by Stefan M. Herzog

LobbyControl @lobbycontrol.bsky.social · Oct 9

Wenn Reiche Reiche lobbyieren

@fragdenstaat.de zeigt, wie die Stiftung Familienunternehmen bei Ministerin Reiche lobbyierte – und die zeigt sich empfänglich.

Brisant: Die Stiftung lobbyierte für ein umstrittenes Vorhaben, gibt das aber nicht im Lobbyregister an. 1/

fragdenstaat.de/artikel/exkl...

Wirtschaftsministerium: Reiche berät Reiche

Bei Treffen mit der Stiftung Familienunternehmen gaben Ministerin Reiche und ihr Staatssekretär Tipps, wie die Superreichen-Lobby Steuersenkungen erreichen könne. Das zeigen interne Unterlagen.

fragdenstaat.de

Reposted by Stefan M. Herzog

Pidgeon - The Mighty Croissant Bird @onefouronefive.bsky.social · Oct 8

Okay das ist witzig, wenn man das so visualisiert

Ein Kreisdiagramm. Steuerhinterziehung ist Blau markiert, und nimmt einen Großteil des Kreises ein. Sozialbetrug in Anführungszeichen ist Lila markiert, und praktisch nicht sichtbar. Jens Spahn ist orange markiert, und nimmt einen deutlich sichtbaren Bereich ein

Stefan Herzog @stefanherzog.bsky.social · Oct 8

🚨⬇️
___
Bald könnten ALLE Chat-Nachrichten von den Behörden durchsucht werden – selbst ohne Verdacht! Das entscheiden *heute* die Minister*innen. Sag Nein zur Chatkontrolle! Jetzt unterzeichnen ✍️ weact.campact.de/petitions/ch...

Chatkontrolle stoppen!

Die EU-Kommission will Messenger-Dienste wie WhatsApp und Signal zwingen, alle privaten Nachrichten und Fotos in Echtzeit zu scannen. Angeblich zum Kinderschutz. In Wahrheit bedeutet die Chatkontrolle...

weact.campact.de

Reposted by Stefan M. Herzog

Science Feedback @sciencefeedback.bsky.social · Sep 29

🚨 New report out: the first cross-platform, cross-country baseline on misinformation in Europe

Based on large scale data analysis: ~2.6M posts (24B views) collected on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok, X & YouTube

science.feedback.org/first-measurement-disinformation-major-platforms-europe

What our first measurement says about disinformation on major platforms in Europe - Science Feedback

Science Feedback and partners have released a first measurement of Structural Indicators across six Very Large Online Platforms (VLOPs) in four EU member states (France, Spain, Poland, Slovakia). Belo...

science.feedback.org

Reposted by Stefan M. Herzog

Mario Sixtus @sixtus.net · Sep 18

Eine Partei, die Frauen, die über ihren Körper selbst bestimmen, zu Straftäterinnen macht, die sich dagegen wehrt, ein Verbotsprüfungsverfahren gegen eine faschistische Partei einzuleiten, setzt sich mit einer frauenhassenden, religiös-faschistischen Terrorregierung an einen Tisch. Passt.

Migrationspolitik: Dobrindt verteidigt Gespräche mit Taliban über Abschiebungen

Bundesinnenminister Alexander Dobrindt will "regelmäßig" weitere Straftäter nach Afghanistan abschieben. Zugleich verteidigt er im Bundestag Gespräche mit den Taliban.

www.zeit.de

Reposted by Stefan M. Herzog

Adrienne Fichter @adfichter.bsky.social · Sep 18

Wir werden alle Datenfutter für die KI von LinkedIn (zu Microsoft zugehörig), wenn wir uns nicht wehren. LinkedIn nutzt das Opt-Out-Land Schweiz aus (ob EU weiss ich nicht). Und setzt den Toogle bei uns allen auf ON.

Ja, es ist verdammt frech.

Hier ⬇️aussteigen:
www.linkedin.com/mypreference...

Daten zur Verbesserung generativer KI
Darf LinkedIn Ihre auf LinkedIn erstellten personenbezogenen Daten und Inhalte verwenden, um generative KI-Modelle von LinkedIn zu schulen, die zum Erstellen von Inhalten verwendet werden?

Ihre Daten zum Schulen von KI-Modellen verwenden, um Inhalte zu erstellen

ein/aus

Jamie Cummins @jamiecummins.bsky.social · Sep 18

Can large language models stand in for human participants?
Many social scientists seem to think so, and are already using "silicon samples" in research.

One problem: depending on the analytic decisions made, you can basically get these samples to show any effect you want.

THREAD 🧵

The threat of analytic flexibility in using large language models to simulate human data: A call to attention

Social scientists are now using large language models to create "silicon samples" - synthetic datasets intended to stand in for human respondents, aimed at revolutionising human subjects research. How...

arxiv.org

Reposted by Stefan M. Herzog

Patrick Breitenbach @patrickbreitenbach.de · Sep 17

"Free Speech" wird als taktisches Werkzeug genutzt, um gesellschaftlich eher geächtete Positionen (Rassismus, Sexismus, Klassismus) wieder in die breite Akzeptanz zurück zu holen. Es geht dabei nicht um "Free Speech", denn wir sehen ja, dass Gegenrede von den gleichen Leuten hart sanktioniert wird.

Stefan Herzog @stefanherzog.bsky.social · Sep 11

PDF available at pure.mpg.de/rest/items/i...

pure.mpg.de

Reposted by Andreas Ortmann

Stefan Herzog @stefanherzog.bsky.social · Sep 11

🧠🤖 Ever wondered about the risks of the increasing customization capabilities of AI/AI-powered chatbots & what we can do about it? Check out our recent-ish paper:

The governance & behavioral challenges of generative artificial intelligence’s hypercustomization capabilities. doi.org/10.1177/2379...

Reposted by Taha Yasseri, Stefan M. Herzog

Vito Trianni @vitotrianni.bsky.social · Sep 9

🌍 Join us for #HACID Webinar #4: Gender & Diversity in Hybrid Collective Intelligence 🧠🤖
🗓 Sept 29, 2025 | ⏰ 18:00 CEST

Register here: events.teams.microsoft.com/event/71775f...

Photo by cottonbro studio: https://www.pexels.com/photo/photo-of-people-using-their-smartphones-8088445/

Reposted by Timnit Gebru, Anna O. Law, Margaret Mitchell , and 44 more Timnit Gebru, Anna O. Law, Margaret Mitchell, Stephan Lewandowsky, Euan G. Ritchie, Steve Peers, Elizabeth Stokoe, Ernesto Priego, Ana Delicado, Martin Tomko, Rebecca Sear, David S. Cohen, Jo Barraket, Silvia Secchi, Patrick S. Forscher, Stephen D. Murphy, Beatriz Gallardo Paúls, John Hogan, Christine Kooi, Ben Crum, Stefan M. Herzog, Aoife O’Donoghue, Jonathan Webber, Nikolay Marinov, Fiona Moore, Tama Leaver, Zen Faulkes, Madeleine Pownall, Erin O’Donnell, David Murakami Wood, Aurélien Mondon, Ann Bartow, Clayton Littlejohn, Henrik Skaug Sætra, Jack Stilgoe, James Connelly, Aleksandra Urman, Juan Ramón, Gary Marcus, Michael Larkin, Thessa Jensen, Alysia Blackham, Hilary J. Allen, Annette Yoshiko Reed, Maksym Polyakov, Elisa Freschi, Pierre Mariotte

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · Sep 6

Finally! 🤩 Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia:
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity.
1/n

Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or
even imposed on users — in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in
the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or
apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we
are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not
considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This
is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse
and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece,
we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology
industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to
relevant work to further inform our colleagues.

Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI
(black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are
in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are
both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and
Apple’s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf.
Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al.
2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA).

Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms
are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe.

Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles

Reposted by Stefan M. Herzog

Ana Sofia Morais @anasofiamorais.bsky.social · Sep 4

We’ve all heard it: people make 200 mindless food decisions a day. But is it true? In our latest episode, Almudena Claassen reveals why this number is misleading and offers strategies that help families and individuals make healthier choices. tinyurl.com/3k2tjw6x

Reposted by Stephan Lewandowsky, Stefan M. Herzog

Ezequiel Lopez-Lopez @eloplop.bsky.social · Jul 28

New research out!🚨

In our new paper, we discuss how generative AI (GenAI) tools like ChatGPT can mediate confirmation bias in health information seeking.
As people turn to these tools for health-related queries, new risks emerge.
🧵👇
nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...

NYAS Publications

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) applications, such as ChatGPT, are transforming how individuals access health information, offering conversational and highly personalized interactions. Whi...

nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Reposted by Leonhard Dobusch, Stefan M. Herzog

Markus Beckedahl @netzpolitik.bsky.social · May 21

Wir müssen digitale Grundrechte anders erzählen – und endlich lauter werden.

Warum ich das Zentrum für Digitalrechte und Demokratie gegründet habe:

digitalpolitik.ghost.io/wir-mussen-d...

@digitalrechte.bsky.social

Wir müssen digitale Grundrechte anders erzählen – und endlich lauter werden

Vor einiger Zeit habe ich netzpolitik.org verlassen – nach fast 20 Jahren, in denen wir gemeinsam viel bewegt haben. Danach habe ich mir bewusst Zeit genommen: Was braucht es jetzt? Wo kann ich meine ...

digitalpolitik.ghost.io

Reposted by Stefan M. Herzog, Rense Corten

Tobias Galla @tobiasgalla.bsky.social · Jul 16

Review "Opinion dynamics: Statistical physics and beyond"
arxiv.org/abs/2507.11521

Lab experiments, data, models, analytical/computational tools. 93 pages, >1k references.

With Fabian Baumann, David Garcia, Gerardo Iñiguez, Márton Karsai, Jan Lorenz, Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron. Led by Michele Starnini

Opinion dynamics: Statistical physics and beyond

Opinion dynamics, the study of how individual beliefs and collective public opinion evolve, is a fertile domain for applying statistical physics to complex social phenomena. Like physical systems, soc...

arxiv.org

Reposted by Stefan M. Herzog

Iyad Rahwan | إياد رهوان @iyadrahwan.bsky.social · Jul 15

Great coverage by @sciam.bsky.social of our research on how ChatGPT is influencing the words we use in conversation!

Work led by Hiromu Yakura & @levinbrinkmann.bsky.social

www.scientificamerican.com/article/chat...

ChatGPT Is Changing the Words We Use in Conversation

Words frequently used by ChatGPT, including “delve” and “meticulous,” are getting more common in spoken language, according to an analysis of more than 700,000 hours of videos and podcasts

www.scientificamerican.com

Reposted by Stefan M. Herzog

Kathrin Kühn @kathrinkuehn.bsky.social · Jul 15

Meinungsbildung über Social Media. Eigentlich wissen es alle - was hier läuft, ist nicht repräsentativ, im Gegenteil. Das Bild ist verzerrt, das Extreme bekommt mehr Raum. In den Dlf Systemfragen hat @lucarehseknauf.bsky.social die Lage gebündelt: www.deutschlandfunk.de/social-media... 1/

Social Media: Wer bricht das Schweigen der stillen Beobachter?

Bis zu 90 Prozent der User auf Social Media sind stille Beobachter. Extreme Meinungen werden so sichtbarer, Diskussionen polarisierter. Wie wäre das zu ändern?

www.deutschlandfunk.de

Reposted by Fabio Giglietto, Stefan M. Herzog, Katrin Weller

Claes de Vreese @claesdevreese.bsky.social · Jul 14

The discussions about big platforms are intense. The systemic risks are real.

Now the #DSA Delegated Act is finally here to ensure data access for researchers. Time to put this system to work.

W @lkseiling.bsky.social, we show how @techpolicypress.bsky.social

www.techpolicy.press/time-to-deli...

Time To Deliver: Stakeholder Roles In The EU’s Delegated Act On Data Access | TechPolicy.Press

The Delegated Act on data access under the DSA provides much-needed clarity about both the access process and expectations towards the actors involved in it.

www.techpolicy.press

Reposted by Brigitte Nerlich, William J. Brady, Paolo Crosetto , and 1 more Brigitte Nerlich, William J. Brady, Paolo Crosetto, Stefan M. Herzog

Stephan Lewandowsky @lewan.bsky.social · Jul 14

Fully transparent and open AI coming out of Switzerland soon. Something worth monitoring. ethz.ch/en/news-and-...

A language model built for the public good

ETH Zurich and EPFL will release a large language model (LLM) developed on public infrastructure. Trained on the “Alps” supercomputer at the Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS), the new LLM ma...

ethz.ch

Reposted by Hugo Mercier, Magnus Johansson, Ian Hussey , and 2 more Hugo Mercier, Magnus Johansson, Ian Hussey, Stefan M. Herzog, Tom Willems

Jamie Cummins @jamiecummins.bsky.social · Jul 7

New preprint commentary from me, @malte.the100.ci, and @ianhussey.mmmdata.io.

Cognitive dissonance in large language models is neither cognitive nor dissonant.

THREAD BELOW 🧵

osf.io/preprints/ps...

OSF

osf.io

Reposted by Stephan Lewandowsky, Victor Galaz, Stefan M. Herzog

Christoph Abels @cabels18.bsky.social · Jul 7

Generative AI (GenAI) can do more than just answer questions - it can tailor its responses based on users’ preferences, habits, and even emotional tone.

We call this capability hypercustomization - explored in our new paper in Behavioral Science & Policy. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

The governance & behavioral challenges of generative artificial intelligence’s hypercustomization capabilities - Christoph M. Abels, Ezequiel Lopez-Lopez, Jason W. Burton, Dawn L. Holford, Levin Brink...

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is changing human–machine interactions and the broader information ecosystem. Much as social media algorithms persona...

journals.sagepub.com

Reposted by Stefan M. Herzog

Center for Adaptive Rationality (MPIB, Berlin) @arc-mpib.bsky.social · Jul 3

We wrapped up the 22nd Summer Institute on Bounded Rationality at the Center for Adaptive Rationality at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development (@mpib-berlin.bsky.social).

ECRs from around the world joined us to share their insights on rationality, cognition, and decision-making.

1/🧵👇

Reposted by Stefan M. Herzog

Jamie Cummins @jamiecummins.bsky.social · Jun 23

Social scientists should not use chat interfaces when using LLMs in their research: they are impressively inefficient, and obscure/impose important methodological decisions that require thought.

THREAD🧵

Reposted by Stefan M. Herzog

Levin Brinkmann @levinbrinkmann.bsky.social · Jun 21

You sound like ChatGPT -- that is what The Verge said about our recent preprint on how ChatGPT is reshaping human spoken communication.

Chatbots are becoming a cultural medium and agent of cultural homogenisation. Is this inevitable, or can model diversity help? www.theverge.com/openai/68674...

You sound like ChatGPT

AI isn’t just impacting how we write — it’s changing how we speak and interact with others. And there’s only more to come.

www.theverge.com

Stephan Lewandowsky @lewan.bsky.social · Jun 19

I am privileged to announce the publication of the Anti-Autocracy Handbook: sks.to/autocracy 1/12

The Anti-Autocracy Handbook: A Scholars' Guide to Navigating Democratic Backsliding

The Anti-Autocracy Handbook is a call to action, resilience, and collective defence of democracy, truth, and academic freedom in the face of mounting authoritarianism. It tries to provide guidance to ...

sks.to

Reposted by Stefan M. Herzog

Der Volksverpetzer @volksverpetzer.de · Jun 17

(1/9) Hier gibt es die Fakten:

1. Das Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz ist dem Bundesinnenministerium unterstellt. Von Storchs Aussage ist hier aber irreführend, da die Aufgaben des Verfassungsschutzes gesetzlich geregelt sind und der*die Innenminister*in Weisungen nicht willkürlich erteilen kann.

Reposted by Stefan M. Herzog

Christian Stöcker @christianstoecker.de · Jun 17

Disinformation is the greatest threat of all. It is the root cause of our inability to tackle climate change (the first Big Lie was climate change denial), the deterioration of democracies, the rise of corrupt populists like Trump.That‘s why the fight science and real journalism.

Pew graph about Republican vs Democratic voters news sources. It is mostly FoX News for Republicans.

Light upyour news

Sign in to Lightnews

Sign up to start reading

Connect Bluesky

Connect with Bluesky

Light up
your news