Science Feedback
@sciencefeedback.bsky.social
Scientists sorting fact from fiction in scientific media coverage.
➡️ science.feedback.org
French account: @sciencefeedback-fr.bsky.social
➡️ science.feedback.org
French account: @sciencefeedback-fr.bsky.social
Pinned
𝗪𝗵𝗼'𝘀 𝘀𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝘀? 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗼 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗮𝘆 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆'𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰 𝘁𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗰𝘀?
Our monthly newsletter (in English and French) helps you track the latest misinformation trends and what scientists are really finding while keeping an eye on policy in this domain.
Our monthly newsletter (in English and French) helps you track the latest misinformation trends and what scientists are really finding while keeping an eye on policy in this domain.
🚨 New report out: the first cross-platform, cross-country baseline on misinformation in Europe
Based on large scale data analysis: ~2.6M posts (24B views) collected on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok, X & YouTube
science.feedback.org/first-measurement-disinformation-major-platforms-europe
Based on large scale data analysis: ~2.6M posts (24B views) collected on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok, X & YouTube
science.feedback.org/first-measurement-disinformation-major-platforms-europe
What our first measurement says about disinformation on major platforms in Europe - Science Feedback
Science Feedback and partners have released a first measurement of Structural Indicators across six Very Large Online Platforms (VLOPs) in four EU member states (France, Spain, Poland, Slovakia). Belo...
science.feedback.org
September 29, 2025 at 3:03 PM
🚨 New report out: the first cross-platform, cross-country baseline on misinformation in Europe
Based on large scale data analysis: ~2.6M posts (24B views) collected on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok, X & YouTube
science.feedback.org/first-measurement-disinformation-major-platforms-europe
Based on large scale data analysis: ~2.6M posts (24B views) collected on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok, X & YouTube
science.feedback.org/first-measurement-disinformation-major-platforms-europe
Claims that DMSO can treat everything from pain to cancer often rely on anecdotes—not solid clinical evidence. Science Feedback reviewed these claims and found major gaps.
🔗 science.feedback.org/beware-mirac...
September 9, 2025 at 9:08 AM
Claims that DMSO can treat everything from pain to cancer often rely on anecdotes—not solid clinical evidence. Science Feedback reviewed these claims and found major gaps.
🔗 science.feedback.org/beware-mirac...
Reposted by Science Feedback
New in TiCS w @dgrand.bsky.social @gordpennycook.bsky.social
It’s been ~10yrs since misinfo research exploded but our paradigms are stuck in the post-2016 “fake news” model
Time for new approaches:
o True/False → Content that misleads
o Belief → Behavior
o Eval interventions in ambiguous settings
It’s been ~10yrs since misinfo research exploded but our paradigms are stuck in the post-2016 “fake news” model
Time for new approaches:
o True/False → Content that misleads
o Belief → Behavior
o Eval interventions in ambiguous settings
August 6, 2025 at 1:40 PM
New in TiCS w @dgrand.bsky.social @gordpennycook.bsky.social
It’s been ~10yrs since misinfo research exploded but our paradigms are stuck in the post-2016 “fake news” model
Time for new approaches:
o True/False → Content that misleads
o Belief → Behavior
o Eval interventions in ambiguous settings
It’s been ~10yrs since misinfo research exploded but our paradigms are stuck in the post-2016 “fake news” model
Time for new approaches:
o True/False → Content that misleads
o Belief → Behavior
o Eval interventions in ambiguous settings
Reposted by Science Feedback
I checked the claim of the DOE report that sea level is rising at a lower rate than predicted by IPCC: it is false.
For 2030, the IPCC AR6 predicts a best estimate 9-10 cm relative to 1995-2014 (Table 9.9).
The satellite data show a rise of 74 mm until 2025. At this rate that will be 93 mm by 2030.
For 2030, the IPCC AR6 predicts a best estimate 9-10 cm relative to 1995-2014 (Table 9.9).
The satellite data show a rise of 74 mm until 2025. At this rate that will be 93 mm by 2030.
August 13, 2025 at 7:58 AM
I checked the claim of the DOE report that sea level is rising at a lower rate than predicted by IPCC: it is false.
For 2030, the IPCC AR6 predicts a best estimate 9-10 cm relative to 1995-2014 (Table 9.9).
The satellite data show a rise of 74 mm until 2025. At this rate that will be 93 mm by 2030.
For 2030, the IPCC AR6 predicts a best estimate 9-10 cm relative to 1995-2014 (Table 9.9).
The satellite data show a rise of 74 mm until 2025. At this rate that will be 93 mm by 2030.
Reposted by Science Feedback
🛡️ @sciencefeedback.bsky.social has been verified by @bsky.team Track verified accounts and trusted verifiers at bverified.vercel.app!
August 12, 2025 at 8:41 PM
🛡️ @sciencefeedback.bsky.social has been verified by @bsky.team Track verified accounts and trusted verifiers at bverified.vercel.app!
Reposted by Science Feedback
Nice article about NASEM review of the endangerment finding by @insideclimatenews.org
National Academies Will Review Endangerment Finding Science insideclimatenews.org/news/0708202...
National Academies Will Review Endangerment Finding Science insideclimatenews.org/news/0708202...
![Andrew Dessler, director of the Texas Center for Extreme Weather at Texas A&M University, said the new controversy that the Trump administration had stirred around climate science was a fitting subject for a fast-track effort by the National Academies.
“The National Academies [were] established exactly to do things like this—to answer questions of scientific importance for the government,” he said. “This is what the DOE should have done all along, rather than hire five people who represent a tiny minority of the scientific community and have views that virtually nobody else agrees with.”](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:uyemf6niinxjzirk7pbzzt3j/bafkreifnvpttyaxod2ph6vreng4vhllbzg45xhfklbuvw7asa6k5eki4by@jpeg)
August 9, 2025 at 4:30 PM
Nice article about NASEM review of the endangerment finding by @insideclimatenews.org
National Academies Will Review Endangerment Finding Science insideclimatenews.org/news/0708202...
National Academies Will Review Endangerment Finding Science insideclimatenews.org/news/0708202...
A viral claim from a Japanese anti-mRNA vaccine group says: “The more shots you get, the sooner you die.”
It’s based on a fundamental error in interpreting data.
Here’s why this conclusion doesn’t hold up:
🔗 science.feedback.org/review/inade...
1/7
It’s based on a fundamental error in interpreting data.
Here’s why this conclusion doesn’t hold up:
🔗 science.feedback.org/review/inade...
1/7
No, Japanese COVID vaccine database doesn't show "the more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die"
A fair comparison of an unvaccinated group with a vaccinated group requires that the two groups are matched in terms of age and medical condition. Multiple published studies have shown that COVID-19 v...
science.feedback.org
August 8, 2025 at 8:40 AM
A viral claim from a Japanese anti-mRNA vaccine group says: “The more shots you get, the sooner you die.”
It’s based on a fundamental error in interpreting data.
Here’s why this conclusion doesn’t hold up:
🔗 science.feedback.org/review/inade...
1/7
It’s based on a fundamental error in interpreting data.
Here’s why this conclusion doesn’t hold up:
🔗 science.feedback.org/review/inade...
1/7
Reposted by Science Feedback
"Misleading U.S. Department of Energy climate report chooses bias over science, climate scientists say" | Article by the team at @sciencefeedback.bsky.social:
science.feedback.org/review/misle...
science.feedback.org/review/misle...
Misleading U.S. Department of Energy climate report chooses bias over science, climate scientists say
DOE report written by climate contrarians shares misleading information on climate change and excludes well-established evidence.
science.feedback.org
August 7, 2025 at 7:10 PM
"Misleading U.S. Department of Energy climate report chooses bias over science, climate scientists say" | Article by the team at @sciencefeedback.bsky.social:
science.feedback.org/review/misle...
science.feedback.org/review/misle...
Reposted by Science Feedback
Is sea level around the US accelerating? If you actually do the analysis, instead of just repeating talking points from decades ago, the answer is yes.
tamino.wordpress.com/2025/08/03/s...
tamino.wordpress.com/2025/08/03/s...
Sea Level Mis-information from DOE
Here in the USA, the Department of Energy (DOE) has issued a report titled “A Critical Review of the Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate.” It is a product of the …
tamino.wordpress.com
August 3, 2025 at 12:26 PM
Is sea level around the US accelerating? If you actually do the analysis, instead of just repeating talking points from decades ago, the answer is yes.
tamino.wordpress.com/2025/08/03/s...
tamino.wordpress.com/2025/08/03/s...
In July 2025, the U.S. DOE released a climate report tied to EPA’s proposed rollback of emissions rules.
The report claims to challenge decades of climate science…
But scientists say it is unscientific and misrepresents key findings 🧵
science.feedback.org/review/misle...
The report claims to challenge decades of climate science…
But scientists say it is unscientific and misrepresents key findings 🧵
science.feedback.org/review/misle...
Misleading U.S. Department of Energy climate report chooses bias over science, climate scientists say
DOE report written by climate contrarians shares misleading information on climate change and excludes well-established evidence.
science.feedback.org
August 6, 2025 at 1:51 PM
In July 2025, the U.S. DOE released a climate report tied to EPA’s proposed rollback of emissions rules.
The report claims to challenge decades of climate science…
But scientists say it is unscientific and misrepresents key findings 🧵
science.feedback.org/review/misle...
The report claims to challenge decades of climate science…
But scientists say it is unscientific and misrepresents key findings 🧵
science.feedback.org/review/misle...
Reposted by Science Feedback
🚨 If you're interested in working on a coordinated response to the DOE climate report, please enter your info on this google form 🚨
Please RT this so as many people see it as possible.
forms.gle/BL9xUAfRxA...
Please RT this so as many people see it as possible.
forms.gle/BL9xUAfRxA...
DOE climate report response form
We are collecting names to assemble a writing team to respond to the DOE climate working group report. If you'd like to contribute, enter your info below. At this point, there is no guarantee what we'll do (if anything), but we want to keep our options open by collecting names. If you have any further questions, feel free to email me.
We are primarily looking for Ph.D. scientists at universities or government labs in appropriate fields. I realize that this will exclude some qualified people and I apologize, but we felt this was necessary for a variety of reasons.
forms.gle
July 31, 2025 at 6:35 PM
🚨 If you're interested in working on a coordinated response to the DOE climate report, please enter your info on this google form 🚨
Please RT this so as many people see it as possible.
forms.gle/BL9xUAfRxA...
Please RT this so as many people see it as possible.
forms.gle/BL9xUAfRxA...
Reposted by Science Feedback
The EPA cited my paper in their argument against the endangerment finding today. However, their point is completely backwards: my paper actually supports the EPA's 2009 range of 1.8C to 4C warming by 2100. www.nature.com/artic...
July 29, 2025 at 9:03 PM
The EPA cited my paper in their argument against the endangerment finding today. However, their point is completely backwards: my paper actually supports the EPA's 2009 range of 1.8C to 4C warming by 2100. www.nature.com/artic...
Reposted by Science Feedback
I've been getting a lot of requests for comments on the DOE report "A critical review of the impact of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions on the U.S. climate". Here are some initial thoughts. More will come later.
July 30, 2025 at 3:26 AM
I've been getting a lot of requests for comments on the DOE report "A critical review of the impact of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions on the U.S. climate". Here are some initial thoughts. More will come later.
𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱?
A recent study found that Earth’s energy balance – the difference between incoming solar energy and outgoing heat – has more than doubled in recent decades.
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/...
A recent study found that Earth’s energy balance – the difference between incoming solar energy and outgoing heat – has more than doubled in recent decades.
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/...
Earth's Energy Imbalance More Than Doubled in Recent Decades
Earth's energy imbalance more than doubled in recent decades The large trend has taken us by surprise, and as a community we should strive to understand the underlying causes Our capability to o...
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
July 30, 2025 at 12:06 PM
𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱?
A recent study found that Earth’s energy balance – the difference between incoming solar energy and outgoing heat – has more than doubled in recent decades.
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/...
A recent study found that Earth’s energy balance – the difference between incoming solar energy and outgoing heat – has more than doubled in recent decades.
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/...
𝗪𝗵𝗼'𝘀 𝘀𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝘀? 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗼 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗮𝘆 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆'𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰 𝘁𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗰𝘀?
Our monthly newsletter (in English and French) helps you track the latest misinformation trends and what scientists are really finding while keeping an eye on policy in this domain.
Our monthly newsletter (in English and French) helps you track the latest misinformation trends and what scientists are really finding while keeping an eye on policy in this domain.
July 29, 2025 at 9:55 AM
𝗪𝗵𝗼'𝘀 𝘀𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝘀? 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗼 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗮𝘆 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆'𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰 𝘁𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗰𝘀?
Our monthly newsletter (in English and French) helps you track the latest misinformation trends and what scientists are really finding while keeping an eye on policy in this domain.
Our monthly newsletter (in English and French) helps you track the latest misinformation trends and what scientists are really finding while keeping an eye on policy in this domain.
1/ 📢 A recent investigation by @Science Feedback and @Alliance4Europe reveals that hundreds of illegal Russian posts remain active on X within the EU, despite numerous user reports under the #DigitalServicesAct (DSA) and clear violations of EU sanctions.
science.feedback.org/flagged-and-...
science.feedback.org/flagged-and-...
Flagged and Ignored: Testing X’s Response to EU Sanction Violations - Science Feedback
Executive Summary Researchers identified hundreds of posts violating EU sanctions on the social media platform X. X is categorised as a “Very Large Online Platform” (VLOP) under the Digital Services ...
science.feedback.org
July 23, 2025 at 2:12 PM
1/ 📢 A recent investigation by @Science Feedback and @Alliance4Europe reveals that hundreds of illegal Russian posts remain active on X within the EU, despite numerous user reports under the #DigitalServicesAct (DSA) and clear violations of EU sanctions.
science.feedback.org/flagged-and-...
science.feedback.org/flagged-and-...
This week at @cgf-uk.bsky.social at European Media&Information Fund Annual Conference, our founder Emmanuel Vincent presented in a panel on what data researchers need to effectively implement European Code of Conduct on Disinformation&advance transparency obligations under the #DigitalServicesAct.
July 17, 2025 at 4:36 PM
This week at @cgf-uk.bsky.social at European Media&Information Fund Annual Conference, our founder Emmanuel Vincent presented in a panel on what data researchers need to effectively implement European Code of Conduct on Disinformation&advance transparency obligations under the #DigitalServicesAct.
𝗪𝗵𝗼’𝘀 𝗮𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰 𝗰𝗮𝗿? A joint report by @sciencefeedback.bsky.social @newtral.es analyzed 9,000+ pieces of content across social media, messaging platforms, TV&radio, in Spain, France, Germany, and the UK, revealing how misleading narratives are slowing down Europe’s green transition. ⤵️
July 3, 2025 at 5:23 AM
𝗪𝗵𝗼’𝘀 𝗮𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰 𝗰𝗮𝗿? A joint report by @sciencefeedback.bsky.social @newtral.es analyzed 9,000+ pieces of content across social media, messaging platforms, TV&radio, in Spain, France, Germany, and the UK, revealing how misleading narratives are slowing down Europe’s green transition. ⤵️
Reposted by Science Feedback
Climate misinformation turning crisis into catastrophe - major report
- IPIE Report comes as a UN human rights official says climate lies should be criminalised and #COP30 Brazil host urges a global crackdown
#climatecrisis
Story by me
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
- IPIE Report comes as a UN human rights official says climate lies should be criminalised and #COP30 Brazil host urges a global crackdown
#climatecrisis
Story by me
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
Climate misinformation turning crisis into catastrophe – major report
False claims obstructing climate action, say researchers, amid calls for climate lies to be criminalised
www.theguardian.com
June 19, 2025 at 11:05 AM
Climate misinformation turning crisis into catastrophe - major report
- IPIE Report comes as a UN human rights official says climate lies should be criminalised and #COP30 Brazil host urges a global crackdown
#climatecrisis
Story by me
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
- IPIE Report comes as a UN human rights official says climate lies should be criminalised and #COP30 Brazil host urges a global crackdown
#climatecrisis
Story by me
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
First #heatwave of 2025 hit the UK last weekend, with temps 🌡️ above 32°C in southeast England. It's well-established that climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of heatwaves, but last week, World Weather Attribution scientists specifically analyzed this event's climate change ties.
June 23, 2025 at 3:13 PM
First #heatwave of 2025 hit the UK last weekend, with temps 🌡️ above 32°C in southeast England. It's well-established that climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of heatwaves, but last week, World Weather Attribution scientists specifically analyzed this event's climate change ties.
Reposted by Science Feedback
🚨In PNAS🚨
The right often accuses fact-checkers of political bias
But we analyzed Community Notes on Musk's X and found posts flagged as "misleading" are 2.3x more likely to be written by Reps than Dems!
The issue is Reps sharing misinformation, not fact-checker bias...
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
The right often accuses fact-checkers of political bias
But we analyzed Community Notes on Musk's X and found posts flagged as "misleading" are 2.3x more likely to be written by Reps than Dems!
The issue is Reps sharing misinformation, not fact-checker bias...
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
June 17, 2025 at 12:51 PM
🚨In PNAS🚨
The right often accuses fact-checkers of political bias
But we analyzed Community Notes on Musk's X and found posts flagged as "misleading" are 2.3x more likely to be written by Reps than Dems!
The issue is Reps sharing misinformation, not fact-checker bias...
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
The right often accuses fact-checkers of political bias
But we analyzed Community Notes on Musk's X and found posts flagged as "misleading" are 2.3x more likely to be written by Reps than Dems!
The issue is Reps sharing misinformation, not fact-checker bias...
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
Reposted by Science Feedback
Are you a journalist writing about a current heatwave?
The images you choose are critical to the story.
The @climateoutreach.bsky.social team have shown some ideas here which help stress the risks rather than the typical ice creams: www.climatevisuals.org/how-do-you-p...
The images you choose are critical to the story.
The @climateoutreach.bsky.social team have shown some ideas here which help stress the risks rather than the typical ice creams: www.climatevisuals.org/how-do-you-p...
How do you photograph heat? - Climate Outreach
www.climatevisuals.org
June 19, 2025 at 11:42 AM
Are you a journalist writing about a current heatwave?
The images you choose are critical to the story.
The @climateoutreach.bsky.social team have shown some ideas here which help stress the risks rather than the typical ice creams: www.climatevisuals.org/how-do-you-p...
The images you choose are critical to the story.
The @climateoutreach.bsky.social team have shown some ideas here which help stress the risks rather than the typical ice creams: www.climatevisuals.org/how-do-you-p...
Reposted by Science Feedback
@sciencefeedback.bsky.social has a nice debunk on it!
climatefeedback.org
science.feedback.org/review/antar...
climatefeedback.org
science.feedback.org/review/antar...
Antarctica recently gained some ice; that doesn’t mark the end of ice loss, global warming or sea-level rise, contrary to viral claims - Science Feedback
Antarctica gained ice from 2021-2023, but this doesn't reverse the multi-decade trend of ice loss there. Global warming and sea-level rise still continue.
science.feedback.org
June 5, 2025 at 3:22 AM
@sciencefeedback.bsky.social has a nice debunk on it!
climatefeedback.org
science.feedback.org/review/antar...
climatefeedback.org
science.feedback.org/review/antar...
YouTuber John Campbell recently posted a video suggesting a preprint that analyzed Czech data showed COVID-19 vaccines reduce women’s fertility. The #preprint reported finding fewer births among women aged 18 to 39 years old who were vaccinated compared to unvaccinated women in the same age group.
Czech data doesn't show COVID-19 vaccines cause infertility
Fertility rates are influenced by many variables, such as age and education. A preprint finding fewer births in vaccinated women didn't account for confounding factors. Published studies didn’t find a...
science.feedback.org
June 2, 2025 at 5:23 PM
YouTuber John Campbell recently posted a video suggesting a preprint that analyzed Czech data showed COVID-19 vaccines reduce women’s fertility. The #preprint reported finding fewer births among women aged 18 to 39 years old who were vaccinated compared to unvaccinated women in the same age group.
Reposted by Science Feedback
I know of 13 studies that have looked at #fertility following mRNA #CovidVaccination, all finding no effect.
Yet misinformation that COVID vaccination harms fertility is *still* circulating!
I spoke to @sciencefeedback.bsky.social
#MedSky #ReproSky #VaccineSky #IDSky
Yet misinformation that COVID vaccination harms fertility is *still* circulating!
I spoke to @sciencefeedback.bsky.social
#MedSky #ReproSky #VaccineSky #IDSky
Czech data doesn't show COVID-19 vaccines cause infertility
Fertility rates are influenced by many variables, such as age and education. A preprint finding fewer births in vaccinated women didn't account for confounding factors. Published studies didn’t find a...
science.feedback.org
June 2, 2025 at 8:39 AM
I know of 13 studies that have looked at #fertility following mRNA #CovidVaccination, all finding no effect.
Yet misinformation that COVID vaccination harms fertility is *still* circulating!
I spoke to @sciencefeedback.bsky.social
#MedSky #ReproSky #VaccineSky #IDSky
Yet misinformation that COVID vaccination harms fertility is *still* circulating!
I spoke to @sciencefeedback.bsky.social
#MedSky #ReproSky #VaccineSky #IDSky