Science Feedback
banner
sciencefeedback.bsky.social
Science Feedback
@sciencefeedback.bsky.social
Scientists sorting fact from fiction in scientific media coverage.
➡️ science.feedback.org
French account: @sciencefeedback-fr.bsky.social
One of our most striking findings: the misinformation premium

Across all platforms except LinkedIn, accounts spreading misinformation get more reach per follower than credible accounts

On YouTube: low-credibility accounts get 8x more interactions per follower than high-credibility ones
September 29, 2025 at 3:08 PM
What we found:
⚠️ TikTok has the highest prevalence of misinformation:
20% of posts on public-interest topics contain false or misleading info.
Facebook is 2nd at 13%

LinkedIn has the lowest prevalence at just 2%, showing platforms can design systems that don’t reward falsehoods
September 29, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Claims that DMSO can treat everything from pain to cancer often rely on anecdotes—not solid clinical evidence. Science Feedback reviewed these claims and found major gaps.
🔗 science.feedback.org/beware-mirac...
September 9, 2025 at 9:08 AM
One of their graphs compared mortality rates in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated people.
It looked like vaccinated people had higher mortality.
But that conclusion ignores a crucial question. 👇
2/7
August 8, 2025 at 8:41 AM
🚩 Another major issue: numerous scientists cited in the report said it misinterpreted their work! E.g. @hausfath.bsky.social www.theclimatebrink.com/p/how-the-do...
August 6, 2025 at 1:53 PM
🚩 First red flag: The report was written by 5 known climate contrarians, not topic experts.
That alone doesn’t invalidate it—but other issues do.
For example, it lacked proper peer review.
In contrast, IPCC reports involve hundreds of authors and a transparent review process.
August 6, 2025 at 1:52 PM
𝗪𝗵𝗼'𝘀 𝘀𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝘀? 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗼 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗮𝘆 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆'𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰 𝘁𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗰𝘀?
Our monthly newsletter (in English and French) helps you track the latest misinformation trends and what scientists are really finding while keeping an eye on policy in this domain.
July 29, 2025 at 9:55 AM
🔴Under the DSA, Very Large Online Platforms must enforce EU laws, including the 2022 ban on Russian state media. The investigation found X’s content moderation slow, inconsistent, and showing linguistic bias, allowing disinformation to circulate widely.
July 23, 2025 at 2:12 PM
▪️Despite being provided w/ detailed behavioural patterns of the sanctioned Russian operation Doppelgänger, X failed to act swiftly.Most flagged posts remained live until the campaign was complete; whereas on @bsky.app, the platform removed around 70% of Doppelgänger accounts within three days after.
July 23, 2025 at 2:12 PM
▪️For the remaining 124 cases, X responded via email, stating that no violation of EU law was found, despite clear evidence to the contrary.

▪️There were 7 responses made by the platform within 2 minutes or less, potentially indicating automated reviews.
July 23, 2025 at 2:12 PM
Key findings:
▪️Of 125 flagged posts linked to Russian state media and Kremlin-affiliated operations, only one was removed; the majority received no enforcement action, with over 50 reports going unanswered.
July 23, 2025 at 2:12 PM
📑 Early hashtag#SIMODS findings (preliminary)

In the presentation below, you can see that LinkedIn has the lowest prevalence of mis/disinformation (~2%), while TikTok has the highest (~20%).
July 17, 2025 at 4:36 PM
We then collaborated with fact‑checking partners in: Poland ( @pravdapl.bsky.social), Slovakia (demagog.sk) , Spain ( @newtral.es), France ( @sciencefeedback-fr.bsky.social) who reviewed a random sample of posts to identify mis/disinformation and estimate its prevalence.
July 17, 2025 at 4:36 PM
𝙒𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙝𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙙 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙬𝙚 𝙖𝙨𝙠𝙚𝙙 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙙𝙖𝙩𝙖?
To quantify the prevalence of misinformation across major platforms, @sciencefeedback.bsky.social submitted formal data access requests. Here’s what we received:
July 17, 2025 at 4:36 PM
It opened by underscoring the European Commission’s recently adopted delegated act under the DSA: very large online platforms are expected to grant qualified researchers access to meaningful data so we can study systemic risks to society, inclu. misinformation and other information manipulations.
July 17, 2025 at 4:36 PM
This week at @cgf-uk.bsky.social at European Media&Information Fund Annual Conference, our founder Emmanuel Vincent presented in a panel on what data researchers need to effectively implement European Code of Conduct on Disinformation&advance transparency obligations under the #DigitalServicesAct.
July 17, 2025 at 4:36 PM
First #heatwave of 2025 hit the UK last weekend, with temps 🌡️ above 32°C in southeast England. It's well-established that climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of heatwaves, but last week, World Weather Attribution scientists specifically analyzed this event's climate change ties.
June 23, 2025 at 3:13 PM
A common tactic behind #vaccine #misinformation is to misrepresent published studies, sometimes by making unfounded extrapolations, thereby creating the illusion that claims of vaccine harms are scientifically substantiated.
May 7, 2025 at 9:37 AM
You’ve probably come across claims by “Frank Bergman” from #SlayNews — a site known for spreading harmful misinformation on climate, health, and politics. It’s gone viral multiple times, but who is behind it?

We investigated.

🔗 science.feedback.org/slay-news-fr...
April 17, 2025 at 4:58 PM
As climate scientist Dr. @hausfath.bsky.social explained to Science Feedback:

“We are confident broadly that both winters and the coldest days of the year are warming rapidly pretty much everywhere, and faster than annual average temperatures have been warming.”
April 8, 2025 at 2:28 PM
April 8, 2025 at 2:28 PM
Why do cold snaps persist if the Earth is warming? This question keeps popping up—sometimes from curiosity, but often as rhetoric for climate denial.
Science Feedback interviewed 5 climate scientists to explore this complex issue: science.feedback.org/cold-snaps-d...
April 8, 2025 at 2:28 PM
The International Energy Agency warns AI's energy demand could double by 2026, but estimating per-query impacts is tough. While comparisons to flight emissions oversimplify the issue, it's clear that AI’s rapid growth is driving higher energy demands and emissions.
March 18, 2025 at 10:13 AM
🌍 How much #energy does #AI really use?

As AI adoption grows, so do concerns about its environmental impact. But estimating the footprint of tools like #ChatGPT is more complex than viral posts suggest.

We explored this issue in our recent insight article:

science.feedback.org/training-and...
March 18, 2025 at 10:13 AM
Starting in France, expanding to Germany & Brazil, Climate Safeguards helps media & regulators tackle climate misinformation where it’s often overlooked. Full report coming Sept 2025.
March 10, 2025 at 1:46 PM