Dr Madeleine Pownall
banner
maddipow.bsky.social
Dr Madeleine Pownall
@maddipow.bsky.social

Associate Professor. Keen bean. Writer. Pedagogy, psychology, reflexivity, open science, iced lattes. ABSENT MINDS coming May 2026๐Ÿ“˜. She/her ๐ŸŒป

Education 24%
Psychology 20%

I'm so excited to see what this turns into. We put out a call for people interested in joining a community a few months ago, and we've now got 400+ researchers.

Qualitopia will be a space to build community, speak to policy, do metascience, and advocate for qualitative methods in their own right.
This year, @annayahprosser.bsky.social, Tamarinde Haven, Nicki Lisa Cole, and I have tried to envision the ideal, utopian future for open qualitative research.

We've had community workshops, talks, a charter, grant apps, a special issue, all to build "Qualitopia" for 2026โœจ qualitopia.my.canva.site

Reposted by Madeleine Pownall

New paper!

We describe how grassroots networks can help implement and harmonize open research efforts via our experience establishing the Norwegian Reproducibility Network -@norrepro.bsky.social.

doi.org/10.7557/11.8...

My precious holiday time is the only thing non-negotiable, so I think this is very good advice!

Huge fan of Editors clearing their desk before Christmas but now I have five papers all with revisions due in January ho ho ho help me
Did you know that from tomorrow, Qualtrics is offering synthetic panels (AI-generated participants)?

Follow me down a rabbit hole I'm calling "doing science is tough and I'm so busy, can't we just make up participants?"

8 months later, my soul-consuming solo paper that has accompanied me round the world was just accepted! ๐Ÿ’˜
I had an idea for a paper at the start of this trip 3 weeks ago and Iโ€™ve been obsessively writing it in every spare moment since. Today it was submitted! This little paper has seen the world with me ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พโœˆ๏ธโค๏ธ
Another way to restart the worldโ€™s idea machine is to restore funding and grants to universities, researchers, and artists.
vox.com Vox @vox.com ยท 10d
America, you have spoken loud and clear: You do not like AI. But what if AI is the way to restart the worldโ€™s idea machine?
Weโ€™re running out of good ideas. AI might be how we find new ones.
What if the best use of AI is restarting the worldโ€™s idea machine?
www.vox.com
๐Ÿ“ฃWe are excited to announce that FORRT is one of the few initiatives worldwide to be formally endorsed as a Programme of the International Decade of Sciences for Sustainable Development (IDSSD, 2024โ€“2033)! ๐ŸŽ‰

Hahaha (or should I say, H_a H_a H_a)

Reposted by Madeleine Pownall

The elves at T-FUN HQ have been working hard and have 2 presents for you ๐ŸŽ๐ŸŽ! That's right, two exciting online seminars are coming to help you kick off 2026 in scholarly style!

See this thread for brief details & check out our website Events page for full bios and abstracts: t-fun.co.uk?page_id=104
Events โ€“ Teaching-Focused University Network
Teaching-Focused University Network
t-fun.co.uk

Happy final lecture day from your friendly neighbourhood statistics lecturers ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ„๐ŸŽ„โœจ @tessaflack.bsky.social
โ€œPositivism Creepโ€

โ€œThe subtle, often unacknowledged infiltration of positivist or post-positivist assumptions into methodologies where they do not naturally, philosophically, practically, or epistemologically belong.โ€

By @thomasgraves.bsky.social @maddipow.bsky.social @annayahprosser.bsky.social
New preprint with Thomas Graves and @annayahprosser.bsky.social: "Getting Creeped Out? Open Science, Qualitative Methods, and the Dangers of Positivism Creep".

osf.io/preprints/so...
OSF
osf.io
It has been a while since @flavioazevedo.bsky.social asked me to take over the Reversals project at @forrt.bsky.social...

It has since evolved beyond my wildest dreams, mostly thanks to @aufdroeseler.bsky.social & @lukaswallrich.bsky.social.

We are very proud of the Replication Hub & Database โ™ฅ๏ธ

"We publish imagined research abstracts as works of fiction firstly because writing for enjoyment is a good thing to encourage...writing imaginatively is a good way to reshape our relationship with writing into something creative and enjoyable"

Reposted by Madeleine Pownall

Finally, we end on:

"The future [under the sway of AI risks being] a constant rehashing of the past, wherein human creativity and communication are not only mediated by but controlled by companies. In the midst of this nonsense, we must nourish
hope in shared values"

doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

8/

The head of open research at Taylor & Francis was supportive when we had a chat and agreed to create some guidelines for living SRs in the first instance, so happy to connect you up if that's useful

Iโ€™d love to hear about how you get on with piloting this!

I am so happy to see this. After the metascience conference in July I spoke with a few publishers to try and propose something similar to this (registered reports meets โ€œlivingโ€ systematic review) but the idea never really got off the ground. This paper is so important and I LOVE it
New preprint ๐ŸŽ‰ Living systematic reviews ensure evidence stays current osf.io/preprints/ps...

In this brief comment (all four pages are here โฌ‡๏ธ), @iaiversen.bsky.social and I cover the benefits and challenges of living systematic reviews, along with two ways to increase their uptake

๐Ÿงต 1/8

Reposted by Madeleine Pownall

Systematic reviews often guide policy and theory, but they can become quickly outdated. Almost 10% of systematic reviews are out of date even *before they are published*.

Living systematic reviews (LSRs) continuously integrate new evidence, therefore they offer a solution to this problem.

2/8
New preprint ๐ŸŽ‰ Living systematic reviews ensure evidence stays current osf.io/preprints/ps...

In this brief comment (all four pages are here โฌ‡๏ธ), @iaiversen.bsky.social and I cover the benefits and challenges of living systematic reviews, along with two ways to increase their uptake

๐Ÿงต 1/8

I was proofreading my book on the train and the man next to me audibly complained when I moved the page before heโ€™d finished reading over my shoulder. Fair play

Wow!

This is such wonderful news. Simine has done so much for advocating for robust, fair, transparent practices throughout psychology and beyond ๐Ÿ‘
Congratulations to @simine.com well deserved winner of the Einstein Foundation Individual Award for Promoting Quality in Research 2025 ๐ŸŽ‰ www.einsteinfoundation.de/en/media/pre...

Reposted by Madeleine Pownall

There is no reason why systematic reviews can't be open. The data used for synthesis is *already* open and there are many excellent open source tools that can facilitate the easy sharing of analysis scripts.

Here's a nice guide for performing open systematic reviews doi.org/10.1525/coll...
HYBRID EVENT: 'Introduction to Quantitative Bias' with Rachel Hughes on Monday 1st December at 10am-12pm UK time.

For those near Leeds, bring your laptop and enjoy this as an in-person session!

Sign-up before 9am on Thursday 27th via: www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/introducti...

Reposted by Madeleine Pownall

Science is a collective effort, but @simine.com is a singular force. She is an exemplary model for all of us to follow in her commitment and action to improving science, on every dimension.

She is so deserving of the award. The only uncertainty is whether the award deserves her!
Congratulations to @simine.com well deserved winner of the Einstein Foundation Individual Award for Promoting Quality in Research 2025 ๐ŸŽ‰ www.einsteinfoundation.de/en/media/pre...
Congratulations to @simine.com well deserved winner of the Einstein Foundation Individual Award for Promoting Quality in Research 2025 ๐ŸŽ‰ www.einsteinfoundation.de/en/media/pre...