#Methodology
November 10, 2025 at 8:54 AM
Okay but what methodology are you using for your shitposts?
November 9, 2025 at 11:17 PM
Jfbsjwo&3!ei&3& I question the data methodology used
November 10, 2025 at 9:28 PM
diet research is mostly not research and has basically no empirical foundation. if you think LLMs are founded on something sketchy you should look at the methodology for diet research
November 10, 2025 at 9:42 PM
periodic reminder that Shelley’s original novel includes no mention of electricity, no description of Frankenstein’s methodology, nothing about trying to defeat death (though lots about trying to *create life*), nothing about stitching corpses together, nothing about abnormal brains, no townsfolk…
November 10, 2025 at 10:41 PM
I find this a very fascinating quote and methodology for Star Wars. Curious what the implications are

-J
Sigourney Weaver discussed Lucasfilm’s current approach to making #StarWars stories:

“What’s interesting about Star Wars now is they’re no longer trying to do the Star Wars to end all Star Wars. They’re letting the universe exist, and tell[ing] really interesting stories within that.”
November 8, 2025 at 5:13 AM
This research methodology - accessing medical records of trans minors without their consent - was made legal in UK only by a special act of government to carry out similar research here under the previous Tory government. It would have been illegal but for the government changing the law.
November 11, 2025 at 8:44 AM
I wish I had a methodology for deciding when to start fights at the dinner table
November 6, 2025 at 4:47 AM
Prescott's 19 page memo criticising specific programmes in 6 different areas. It is much more subjective - coming from his own perspective across issues - than the thematic reviews conducted by the BBC with a clear methodology & engagement with all perspectives

www.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/...
www.bbc.co.uk
November 10, 2025 at 12:02 AM
Letting up when the Republicans are on the ropes and giving them a hand instead of going for the jugular is 100% in keeping with establishment Dems methodology.
November 10, 2025 at 12:29 AM
The methodology is here (where they're quite a bit more modest about what they've done than the accompanying media coverage would suggest):
Itiner-e: A high-resolution dataset of roads of the Roman Empire - Scientific Data
Scientific Data - Itiner-e: A high-resolution dataset of roads of the Roman Empire
www.nature.com
November 6, 2025 at 8:43 PM
It's not just Polymatt's ideas that make him a genius, it's also his attitude. He demonstrates a methodology that is centred around the pursuit of knowledge and understanding. The result is that the 'unsaveable' was saved.

Incredible.
New video up! Just finished the massive project of restoring/rebuilding @lgr-yt.bsky.social’s destroyed Chaplet Halikan LA-30A. This was a big one 😅. Enjoy!

youtu.be/BilLgXkR_Kw
Restoration or Resurrection? Re-creating a rare 80's laptop from the ground up
YouTube video by polymatt
youtu.be
November 9, 2025 at 7:54 PM
As much as I despise Fox "News" and everything they stand for, their polling has always been solid. That doesn't mean they're always right, but their methodology is legitimate, and their results are worth noting, unlike their "news" casts.

And even they underestimated how angry people were.
I keep thinking about the national political reporter I ran into at the no Kings rally in Montclair, New Jersey. She said you know the polls are tightening and he’s really catching fire. it was a media narrative, completely unconnected to what was really happening.
November 6, 2025 at 6:54 PM
We know that persona-prompting leads LLMs to produce exaggerated caricatures of human subjects. Luckily, in this case, we have already anticipated that a stereotype about social scientists is resistance to innovation in methodology and explicitly instructed them to express neutral attitudes towards
November 10, 2025 at 10:56 PM
This methodology is actually applicable to many fields, from yuri to fishing
November 5, 2025 at 10:27 PM
I cannot describe how accurate this is. And this is in ideal conditions. There's a ton more fucked up shit with job hunting than this.

This methodology of employment is not it, chief. Companies will pass on the best employees they'll ever have. And they don't give a fuck.
November 7, 2025 at 1:49 AM
Don't worry, reactions happen like this privately in conference proposals, too! A research group I'm in had a proposal rejected because our methodology on comparing publication rates didn't show that the people who got published didn't deserve it more than those who didn't get published.
November 10, 2025 at 10:30 PM
Absolute nonsense.

Not because it can't be true but because Find Out Now have such dubious methodology and are so misaligned with proven pollsters.
November 6, 2025 at 7:37 PM
They never actually verified these results in an open way, didn't provide the methodology or access to the model that was used. They just claimed they did it, which is nice for them.
November 6, 2025 at 2:35 PM
Methodology slide:
November 10, 2025 at 6:17 PM
Thinking about introducing a new methodology called something like Agentic Design, but it's actually just doing proper research and stakeholder alignment and exploration.

At the end we ask "is using AI actually going to help us solve this problem?" and if the answer isn't "no" we start from the top
November 6, 2025 at 3:56 PM
(I feel like it was a concerning amount and the methodology seemed sound but Consumer Reports has poisoned the well for all of this)
November 10, 2025 at 6:09 PM
...so even when therapy is subpar the clients often feel like they were well supported so you don't hear the same kinds of complaints. But CBT? Its the "easiest" methodology to teach and offers the most structural support to clinicians so its what people who are struggling gravitate towards.

2/
November 9, 2025 at 4:56 PM
Oh Oop I did one spelling methodology for Oranjtober and a very different one for Orangevember! Pardon my inconsistency!
November 9, 2025 at 7:03 AM