Ben Ansell
banner
benansell.bsky.social
Ben Ansell
@benansell.bsky.social

Professor of Comparative Democratic Institutions, Nuffield & University of Oxford, FBA. http://benansell.substack.com. BBC Reith Lecturer 2023. Host BBC Radio 4 Rethink. Columnist for Prospect. Director, Centre for Advanced Social Science Methods (CASSM). .. more

Ben W. Ansell is Professor of Comparative Democratic Institutions at Nuffield College, University of Oxford and, with David Samuels, editor of Comparative Political Studies.

Source: Wikipedia
Political science 47%
Economics 40%

An actual supply side reform

The Claude-code-pilling of Bluesky

Now there, the person who you are subtweeting achieved all those goals easily when themselves in charge of government <finger to ear> what’s that I’m hearing?

Need money to do that though. Or Claude code I suppose

Reposted by Ben H. Ansell

With Nigel Farage claiming it was a "load of nonsense" workers were more productive at home, Britons are divided on whether people who WFH are more or less productive

More productive: 32%
Neither: 26%
Less productive: 31%

yougov.co.uk/topics/econo...

Reposted by Ben H. Ansell

Turns out The Times gave an interview promoting the content of a far-right neo-Nazi
www.channel4.com/news/unmaske...

The answer to this is to edit in a journal in your 40s so that when you think the journals are broken and stupid you have to point at yourself in the mirror.

BRB just recommending a Weierstrass function to Rachel Reeves

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weierst...
Weierstrass function - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org

They should have let us just run the Treasury two decades ago Stephen

New Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Just Dropped
The White House just sent a "Don't Panic" email. That'll do it

Posting on Bluesky before Bluesky existed would be peak Bluesky

The £12 of freedom

Should have written Big Differentiable Function - curses

Yeh but where to get started on that ;)

I think you would probably need to do a switcheroo at 100k, taking away loss of personal allowance but increasing the marginal rate (and perhaps again that at 125k too) rather than for anyone under 100k (say at £90k) who would then be a net loser.

I'm with Juan - I actually don't think people mind the steady levels of marginal tax rates (although I agree they create mini-cliffs). I think there is something to be said for heuristics here.

Yeh I think that keeping mental calculations and comparisons simple is worth the small cliff edges. The weird ones (for student loan repayments, loss of child care, loss of personal allowance) are the ones to turf out

Brought to you by the Big Continuous Function lobby

Creating a labour supply cliff edge at £100k is a great way of having doctors, senior managers, high paid professionals etc engage in lots of salary sacrifice or withdraw labour rather than just the pay the exchequer a standard and high proportion all the way up, as you rightly note

And we tax incomes much more than we tax property, perhaps accordingly...

This is all true but I think the bigger issue is that a normal house in Blackpool might still be ten times incomes in Blackpool. So the problem that what seems to people to be 'reasonable' house prices versus 'reasonable' salaries is out of whack everywhere.

I am comfortable with the idea that the press can be annoying but the source of most political success or failure is in the hands of politicians themselves
Right, but if you strip out the hyperbole it's just "the public are angry about the cost of living, immigration and the NHS and don't particularly understand any of them" which, sure, but what do I do with that?
You may not like it, but strip out the hyperbole and abuse and it's quite hard to argue with this Cummings asssessment of the public mood

I suppose the government’s policy for the past five years has been to use wage inflation as a tax raising device.

Even John McDonnell would shiver at a 62% tax rate at £50k

Beginning to wonder if British public realise that £100,000 and £1m are measured on the same scale

Obviously it’s not been changed because no one cries for the £100k earner but as you say it’s totally mad and as inflation has increased it will affect more and more people.

Reposted by Ben H. Ansell

The tweet that said ‘Britain is a strange place where people think 100k is a high salary but £1m is a normal price for a family home’ lives rent free in my head forever. Pretty clearly is something psychological about it that the boundaries haven’t moved despite v large inflation since then.

Perhaps Darling suddenly just made £100k on promotion and this was Brown’s revenge

There something quite magical about how crossing the £100k income threshold has all these myriad of negative shocks. It’s a bit like cleaning your room by throwing everything under the bed. Oh, we’ll just make the numbers add up by stopping everything at exactly £100k…