Tom Clark
LightNews LightNews
banner
tomsclark.bsky.social
Tom Clark
@tomsclark.bsky.social
1.2K followers 160 following 710 posts

Political scientist at Stanford University studying law, courts, policing, public safety. www.tomclarkphd.com Go birds.

Videos
Economics 30%
Law 20%
Posts Replies Media Videos

Reposted by Stephan Lewandowsky, Will Jennings, Tom Clark , and 11 more

tomjoscelyn.bsky.social
Tom Joscelyn @tomjoscelyn.bsky.social · 4h
Curtis Yarvin, JD Vance’s friend & ideological influence, ended 2025 by claiming “only Hitler spoke the truth” about “too many subjects” & “Hitler was a genius.”

Extremism isn’t fringe on the right. Once marginal online extremists like Yarvin are influential at the highest levels of government.

Reposted by David R. Miller, David Darmofal

tomsclark.bsky.social
Tom Clark @tomsclark.bsky.social · 22h
Question: “why didn’t you just take everyone’s word instead of collecting evidence?”

Answer: “because trials depend on evidence.”
kyledcheney.bsky.social Kyle Cheney @kyledcheney.bsky.social · 23h
Smith explains why he got Speaker McCarthy's phone toll records.

Reposted by Tom Clark

kyledcheney.bsky.social
Kyle Cheney @kyledcheney.bsky.social · 23h
Smith explains why he got Speaker McCarthy's phone toll records.

tomsclark.bsky.social
Tom Clark @tomsclark.bsky.social · 1d
If this is real, it’s pretty funny.
markhamillofficial.bsky.social Mark Hamill @markhamillofficial.bsky.social · 1d
BREAKING NEWS: Actual facts appear for the first time on "Truth" Social.

Reposted by Nandita Sharma, Richard S.J. Tol, Kimberly A. Prather , and 10 more

markhamillofficial.bsky.social
Mark Hamill @markhamillofficial.bsky.social · 1d
BREAKING NEWS: Actual facts appear for the first time on "Truth" Social.

Reposted by Tom Clark, David R. Miller

electproject.bsky.social
Michael McDonald @electproject.bsky.social · 3d
Seems like an important story, like breaking news front page worthy
atrupar.com Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com · 3d
Q: Can you say any more about the explosion in Venezuela that you mentioned in a radio interview. Did the military do that?

TRUMP: Well, it doesn't matter. But there was a major explosion in the dock area where they load the boats up with drugs. We hit the area.

Reposted by Tom Clark, Mark D. White, Daniel W. Drezner , and 3 more

annabower.bsky.social
Anna Bower @annabower.bsky.social · 3d
This is not how a normal Justice Department talks about an ongoing investigation—or about putative targets and their uncharged conduct.
Harmeet K. Dhillon & @HarmeetKDhillon X.com Ok. * Stuff happens Jan 6 2021. This date is IRRELEVANT to prosecuting conspiracy or other wrongdoing re weaponazation (general 5 year statute) * Jan 6 committee in Congress forms in the summer. This is a relevant date (SOL mid 2026 potentially) *Jack Smith appointed over a year later as special counsel in November ... statute runs on his obvious shenanigans late 2027 * Democrats in Congress and those in the states colluding with Biden WH hide their behavior, some of which STILLL HASN'T come to light! Statute runs on this five years after their concealed behavior is known to the government. This means the statute could run in the next administration. STOP POSTING CLICKBAIT BS!! You are being used!

Reposted by Brendan Nyhan, Tom Clark, Scott L. Greer , and 8 more

mcopelov.bsky.social
Mark Copelovitch @mcopelov.bsky.social · 4d
Barely a blip in the news. 🦗from the New York Times editorial and opinion pages. Compare with days of Hunter Biden Hysteria about unprecedented abuse of the pardon power.

Reposted by Tom Clark, Juan Cole, Nelson Flores

jaspar.bsky.social
J. Emory Parker 🏳️‍🌈 @jaspar.bsky.social · 5d
This has been the autocrat’s playbook for a decade or two: have friendly oligarchs buy up independent media and then they impose government-friendly editorial policies so the autocrat doesn’t have to get their hand directly dirty killing the free press.

Reposted by Tom Clark, Juan Cole, Silvia Secchi , and 1 more

robertscotthorton.bsky.social
Scott Horton @robertscotthorton.bsky.social · 5d
Iowa-based journalist Laura Belin compares Bari Weiss' adventures at CBS to Putin's makeover of supposedly independent Russian media, which she covered for RFE-RL twenty years ago. www.bleedingheartland.com/2025/12/25/o...
On "fair" reporting and what happened at "60 Minutes"
Laura Belin: I was alarmed (though not surprised) when CBS News boss Bari Weiss intervened to stop “60 Minutes” from airing a segment.
www.bleedingheartland.com

tomsclark.bsky.social
Tom Clark @tomsclark.bsky.social · 6d
These stories are really shocking. Which is good, we shouldn’t get used to the government abridging civil liberties and abusing its power.
donmoyn.bsky.social Don Moynihan @donmoyn.bsky.social · 6d
I did not understand this: one of the five Europeans the US has barred from traveling to the United States...is a permanent resident who lives with his family in the US.

Now he is worried about being arrested and deported for the crime of monitoring online hate.
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/25/u...
Judge Blocks Detention of British Researcher Who Scrutinizes Online Hate
www.nytimes.com

Reposted by Tom Clark, John Horgan, Steve Peers , and 8 more

donmoyn.bsky.social
Don Moynihan @donmoyn.bsky.social · 6d
I did not understand this: one of the five Europeans the US has barred from traveling to the United States...is a permanent resident who lives with his family in the US.

Now he is worried about being arrested and deported for the crime of monitoring online hate.
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/25/u...
Judge Blocks Detention of British Researcher Who Scrutinizes Online Hate
www.nytimes.com

tomsclark.bsky.social
Tom Clark @tomsclark.bsky.social · 7d
We’re way deep into the Idiocracy plot at this point.

Reposted by Joe R. Feagin, Tom Clark, Henry Jones , and 1 more

steadystatevets.bsky.social
The Steady State @steadystatevets.bsky.social · 7d
If ICE can threaten arrest for filming, then journalists, watchdogs, and protesters can all be silenced the same way. You don’t have freedom of the press if recording police is treated as terrorism.  #holdfast

www.cato.org/blog/dhs-pol...
The Government Unconstitutionally Labels ICE Observers as Domestic Terrorists
A free country must have an absolute wall of protection for those who record government actions.
www.cato.org

Reposted by Nina Jankowicz, Lisa W. Fazio, Stephan Lewandowsky , and 23 more

yoyoel.com
Yoel Roth @yoyoel.com · 8d
A small (personal) example of this book’s intellectual dishonesty:

My father-in-law is reading In Covid’s Wake, and excitedly told me he found a passage where I’m quoted. The quote in question is me saying the FBI worked to censor speech on social media.

Huh? When did I say that?!
A passage from the book In Covid’s Wake, with a highlighted sentence reading: “Yoel Roth, the former head of trust and safety at Twitter, states that "the FBI went beyond strategic information sharing and made direct moderation demands," including demands involving domestic speech.”

tomsclark.bsky.social
Tom Clark @tomsclark.bsky.social · 8d
Step 1, start a trade war to grind imports to a halt, destroying the logistics industry.

Step 2, build a secret police force to round up people you don’t like.

Step 3, make use of the destroyed logistics infrastructure to treat human beings like cargo.

apple.news/ABuh7OUkjTs2...
ICE documents reveal plan to hold 80,000 immigrants in warehouses — The Washington Post
The Trump administration wants to build seven large-scale deportation hubs to speed up deportations, internal ICE documents show.
apple.news

Reposted by Tom Clark, Philip Nel, Juan Cole , and 5 more

adamparkhomenko.bsky.social
Adam Parkhomenko @adamparkhomenko.bsky.social · 8d
That’s not how GDP works. But it is how propaganda works.

Reposted by Steven Heydemann, Tom Clark, Robert C. Richards , and 2 more

walterolson.bsky.social
Walter Olson @walterolson.bsky.social · 9d
Restoring Bivens rights: one bill "would allow citizens to sue for damages resulting from constitutional violations committed by federal officers," while the other "would create a cause of action against federal law enforcement agencies and police depts for constitutional violations."
These congressmen want to give you the right to sue federal law enforcement for violating your rights
The proposed bills aim to codify a 1971 Supreme Court ruling that allowed individuals to sue the feds for Fourth Amendment violations.
reason.com

Reposted by Tom Clark, Eric Goldman, Alan Richardson , and 9 more

atrupar.com
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com · 9d
Sean Duffy on blue states: "What I can do is I can pull their money. That's the leverage I do have ... I guarantee you that the federal taxpayer is not going to fund their roads and bridges and their systems when they are putting illegals on the roads."

tomsclark.bsky.social
Tom Clark @tomsclark.bsky.social · 10d
Ellison is trying to buy Warner Bros. Now that the US has become a full-fledged personalist regime, this is just the way things work.
owillis.bsky.social Oliver Willis @owillis.bsky.social · 10d
CBS paid the president of the United States millions in bribe money and now they censor news reports so it does not annoy him. I don’t know how much plainer we can put this.

Reposted by Tom Clark, Fabián Muniesa

robertscotthorton.bsky.social
Scott Horton @robertscotthorton.bsky.social · 10d
A violent Neo Nazi organization with close ties to and funding from the Kremlin appears suddenly to get a green light from Kash Patel's FBI.
Neo-Nazi terror group steps up US operations as FBI pulls back
Online activity shows the Base, headed by alleged Russian asset Rinaldo Nazzaro, sees US and Ukraine as key centers
www.theguardian.com

Reposted by Kevin J. Anchukaitis, Tom Clark, Eric Goldman , and 12 more

owillis.bsky.social
Oliver Willis @owillis.bsky.social · 10d
CBS paid the president of the United States millions in bribe money and now they censor news reports so it does not annoy him. I don’t know how much plainer we can put this.

tomsclark.bsky.social
Tom Clark @tomsclark.bsky.social · 10d
This is how it works. Let the administration corruptly influence the media, and then the media no liber can report on government.
annabower.bsky.social Anna Bower @annabower.bsky.social · 10d
Per NY Times’s Michael Grynbaum on X, this is Sharyn Alfonsi’s email to her “60 Minutes” colleagues in full:
News Team, Thank you for the notes and texts. I apologize for not reaching out earlier. I learned on Saturday that Bari Weiss spiked our story, INSIDE CECOT, which was supposed to air tonight. We (Ori and I) asked for a call to discuss her decision. She did not afford us that courtesy/opportunity. Our story was screened five times and cleared by both CBS attorneys and Standards and Practices. It is factually correct. In my view, pulling it now-after every rigorous internal check has been met is not an editorial decision, it is a political one. We requested responses to questions and/or interviews with DHS, the White House, and the State Department. Government silence is a statement, not a VETO. Their refusal to be interviewed is a tactical maneuver designed to kill the story. If the administration's refusal to participate becomes a valid reason to spike a story, we have effectively handed them a "kill switch" for any reporting they find inconvenient. If the standard for airing a story becomes "the government must agree to be interviewed," then the government effectively gains control over the 60 Minutes broadcast. We go from an investigative powerhouse to a stenographer for the state. These men risked their lives to speak with us. We have a moral and professional obligation to the sources who entrusted us with their stories. Abandoning them now is a betrayal of the most basic tenet of journalism: giving voice to the voiceless. CBS spiked the Jeffrey Wigand interview due to legal concerns, nearly destroying the credibility of this broadcast. It took years to recover from that "low point." By pulling this story to shield an administration, we are repeating that history, but for political optics rather than legal ones. We have been promoting this story on social media for days. Our viewers are expecting it. When it fails to air without a credible explanation, the public will correctly identify this as corporate censorship. We are trading 50 years of "Gold Standard" reputation for a single week of political quiet. I care too much about this broadcast to watch it be dismantled without a fight. Sharyn

Reposted by Anne Applebaum, Timothy Snyder, Kim L. Scheppele , and 29 more

annabower.bsky.social
Anna Bower @annabower.bsky.social · 10d
Per NY Times’s Michael Grynbaum on X, this is Sharyn Alfonsi’s email to her “60 Minutes” colleagues in full:
News Team, Thank you for the notes and texts. I apologize for not reaching out earlier. I learned on Saturday that Bari Weiss spiked our story, INSIDE CECOT, which was supposed to air tonight. We (Ori and I) asked for a call to discuss her decision. She did not afford us that courtesy/opportunity. Our story was screened five times and cleared by both CBS attorneys and Standards and Practices. It is factually correct. In my view, pulling it now-after every rigorous internal check has been met is not an editorial decision, it is a political one. We requested responses to questions and/or interviews with DHS, the White House, and the State Department. Government silence is a statement, not a VETO. Their refusal to be interviewed is a tactical maneuver designed to kill the story. If the administration's refusal to participate becomes a valid reason to spike a story, we have effectively handed them a "kill switch" for any reporting they find inconvenient. If the standard for airing a story becomes "the government must agree to be interviewed," then the government effectively gains control over the 60 Minutes broadcast. We go from an investigative powerhouse to a stenographer for the state. These men risked their lives to speak with us. We have a moral and professional obligation to the sources who entrusted us with their stories. Abandoning them now is a betrayal of the most basic tenet of journalism: giving voice to the voiceless. CBS spiked the Jeffrey Wigand interview due to legal concerns, nearly destroying the credibility of this broadcast. It took years to recover from that "low point." By pulling this story to shield an administration, we are repeating that history, but for political optics rather than legal ones. We have been promoting this story on social media for days. Our viewers are expecting it. When it fails to air without a credible explanation, the public will correctly identify this as corporate censorship. We are trading 50 years of "Gold Standard" reputation for a single week of political quiet. I care too much about this broadcast to watch it be dismantled without a fight. Sharyn

Reposted by Tom Clark

donmoyn.bsky.social
Don Moynihan @donmoyn.bsky.social · 10d
The thing about the Free Press is that you can read it and have no idea that Trump is violating the purported values of the publication, or even that he is President. And the Free Press is the reason why Bari Weiss was put in charge of CBS News.
top stories from the Free press, no mention of Trump

tomsclark.bsky.social
Tom Clark @tomsclark.bsky.social · 10d
This is the upshot for the government that exerts a control over the media.
60minutes.bsky.social 60 Minutes @60minutes.bsky.social · 10d
An Editor’s Note from 60 Minutes
The broadcast lineup for tonight’s edition of 60 Minutes has been updated. Our report “Inside CECOT” will air in a future broadcast.

Reposted by Peter Murphy, Tom Clark, David R. Miller

billamend.bsky.social
Bill Amend @billamend.bsky.social · 10d
Tonight’s dumb napkin cartoon…

Reposted by Anne Applebaum, Shannon Vallor, Will Jennings , and 26 more

60minutes.bsky.social
60 Minutes @60minutes.bsky.social · 10d
An Editor’s Note from 60 Minutes
The broadcast lineup for tonight’s edition of 60 Minutes has been updated. Our report “Inside CECOT” will air in a future broadcast.

Reposted by Nandita Sharma, Joe R. Feagin, Tom Clark , and 4 more

atrupar.com
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com · 11d
BRENNAN: What are you going to do to force DOJ to comply?

MASSIE: The quickest way and most expeditious way to get justice for these victims is to bring inherent contempt against Pam Bondi. That doesn't require going through the courts. We're drafting that right now.

Reposted by Elizabeth Saunders, Tom Clark

tompepinsky.com
Tom Pepinsky @tompepinsky.com · 11d
An underappreciated dimension of our media and politics environment is that every policy principal is now terminally online, arguing basic policy matters in public

In no sane world, prior to 2016, would anyone want the DNI (or any admin official) to set or defend U.S. policy or objectives this way