Noah Deuce
banner
noahdeuce.bsky.social
Noah Deuce
@noahdeuce.bsky.social
Neo-Butlerian. Liberals and portable suns
Reposted by Noah Deuce
About the same time the NYT sat on a scoop tying Trump to Epstein, Maggie Haberman was downright giddy (y'all) about NYT promoting an anti-Hillary Clinton book.
November 12, 2025 at 9:07 PM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
No single thesis has ever been so vindicated as 'they like Trump and want him to win'
About the same time the NYT sat on a scoop tying Trump to Epstein, Maggie Haberman was downright giddy (y'all) about NYT promoting an anti-Hillary Clinton book.
November 14, 2025 at 6:18 AM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
It becomes overly clear why #MeToo was considered such a threat by powerful men and why they have done everything to mock and discredit it.
November 13, 2025 at 1:57 PM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
We won the Civil War because we drowned the feudalists in blood and lead. The sharp end of a strong liberal state is very sharp indeed.
November 14, 2025 at 1:55 AM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
I continue to disagree with this. The goal of mass detention is mass deportations. A private prison company leasing 100 beds to ICE gets paid the same if the beds are filled by 100 people for a year each or 1,000 people for a few days each. They don't earn more with long-term detention.
It's not about deporting them. It's about detaining them indefinitely and enriching Prisons for Profiteers and the grift the Convict in the Oval Office collects per detainee.
November 13, 2025 at 9:53 PM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
for the record, this is how the @nytimes.com covered Bloomberg, a man elected to the same office as Katie Wilson with the exact same amount of experience in public office as Katie Wilson, but whom the paper did not view with obvious contempt www.nytimes.com/2001/11/07/n...
November 13, 2025 at 10:03 PM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
They think you’re stupid.
"I'm a rando who prefers to believe that everything is a conspiracy and am happy to tell women that I know better than she does how their literal job works" That a news org makes an editorial decision you wouldn't (or I wouldn't) doesn't mean someone is killing a story on behalf of a powerful person
"I write for the New York Times, and I can assure you that we've never buried stories on behalf of powerful people, many of those powerful people being part of NYT management. We only publish what's fit to print, like Zohran's application to Columbia that was leaked by a white nationalist"
November 13, 2025 at 9:13 PM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
the reporter assigned to cover epstein and his connections to trump was from the finance desk. also he was more or less on epstein's payroll.
Reporters covering Trump are not the same reporters assigned to cover the NYC mayor's race. Beat reporters have to develop sources and that takes time so you can't just switch beats with every story. So no, a reporter covering the NYC race is not going to suddenly do a Trump story, and vice versa.
So when Trump is running for president, stories about him are less newsworthy than when Mamdani is running for NYC mayor? Fascinating, continue, you're doing really well.
November 13, 2025 at 9:32 PM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
“The New York Times doesn’t think a couple of emails is newsworthy” they think you’re stupid.
The emails that you’re seeing now are news in themselves, but that’s because of how they’re coming out—a congressional committee released them—& the context in which they’re being viewed. A guy emailing a reporter talking about old girlfriends or saying someone is “dirty” is not a whole news story.
November 13, 2025 at 5:18 PM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
Eventually someone's gonna leak the group chat in which they're coordinating all this
The emails that you’re seeing now are news in themselves, but that’s because of how they’re coming out—a congressional committee released them—& the context in which they’re being viewed. A guy emailing a reporter talking about old girlfriends or saying someone is “dirty” is not a whole news story.
November 13, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
in the 19th century, there were extraordinarily graphic religious tracts condemning lesbianism and bondage. these were sold for relatively high prices to people who wanted to read about lesbianism and bondage. QAnon is that, but for pedophilia.
q anon specifically is really fascinating given that it was initially founded on an infamous gathering site for pedophiles, moved to the site which was explicitly founded by pedophiles for pedophiles, and basically faded away when its followers just got bored of Satanic Pedophile Armageddon
November 13, 2025 at 3:02 AM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
Today is a good day to remember, and to say, that the #MeToo movement was right, and was righteous, and has been vindicated over and over again. There was no overreach. There was no excess. There was no they-went-too-far.

So much work remains to be done.
November 12, 2025 at 11:16 PM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills: the emails from Landon Thomas has his New York Times signature block...he was employed by NY Times at the time. He was communicating directly with Epstein about Trump, and was given incriminating information about Trump. It's been in NYT's possession since 2015
November 12, 2025 at 7:23 PM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
whereas i think far too many contemporary feminists are desperate not to see how awful and how pervasive patriarchy genuinely is--because it's fucking SCARY. if THIS is what we're up against--how can we possibly win?

there are answers. but you need to start with courage, not denial.
November 11, 2025 at 1:38 AM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
After yesterday’s surrender, we’re launching the largest Democratic primary program that we’ve ever run.

We will not back any Senate primary candidate unless they call for Schumer to step down as Minority Leader.

If you’re as pissed as we are, join this campaign to rebuild the Democratic Party. 👇
Democratic leaders have failed us again. It's time to get new leaders.
After yet another capitulation by Chuck Schumer and Senate Democrats, it's clear we need new leadership capable of mounting a serious opposition to Trump's authoritarian regime. We're launching our la...
www.indivisible2026.org
November 11, 2025 at 12:00 AM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
The model of holding individual senators responsible is broken here. The retirees clearly agreed to take the fall. Which is why the nos should get no credit for voting no unless they move to oust Schumer
November 10, 2025 at 3:20 AM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
Important to understand this. There's a reasonable chance that your Dem Senator who voted against it and is acting mad now was in on the play. It's the same reason why they scheduled the surrender for AFTER the election this week. They didn't want people pissed at Dems right before an election.
The caucus meeting was just to orchestrate who would fall on the sword but not be up for a vote in 2026.
so currently defectors are:

Kaine (2030)
Shaheen (Retiring)
Hasan (2028)
Fetterman (2028)
Durbin (Retiring)
CCM (2028)
Rosen (2030)
King (2030)
November 10, 2025 at 2:11 AM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
I'm really sorry it had to happen like this but I'm heartened to see more people recognizing the need for Reconstruction Democrats regardless of who has to go to get them there.

and let's be realistic they are going to do this again in january like, note for note.
November 10, 2025 at 3:30 AM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
"oh gee why can't you all just get along, stop being divisive"

I'm sorry are you Jon Stewart on Crossfire twenty years ago? Or do you want to come back to this planet in the year 2025? The overwhelming gripe is people think you're spineless, not that your DW-NOMINATE score isn't bipartisan enough
November 10, 2025 at 3:15 AM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
i am also previsaging in my brain palace that several deeply unfortunate people will win essentially fetterman-style: people are sick of dem leadership janking them around, and so they'll vote for people who talk, rather than believe, right. i see it as if it were my own hand in front of me rn.
November 10, 2025 at 2:37 AM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
So many graves to piss on, so little time
November 10, 2025 at 2:20 AM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
Odds of this becoming truly ridiculous are not zero
Thune now shuttling between the three hardliners and a group of approps cardinals who don’t look happy
November 10, 2025 at 2:22 AM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
Just imagining the meeting where they must have been like “they might cancel my flight? Time to kill the sick.”
November 10, 2025 at 1:03 AM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
She's giving CCM cover, maybe with a general blessing from the NV dem party. Shutdown in Nevada has been a disaster.
Well well well, how the tables have turned nevadacurrent.com/2025/10/09/t...
November 10, 2025 at 1:50 AM
Reposted by Noah Deuce
i don't think democratic voters should have to spend this much time whipping democratic elected officials.
November 9, 2025 at 11:48 PM