Lucy Barnes
LightNews LightNews
lucy-barnes.bsky.social
Lucy Barnes
@lucy-barnes.bsky.social
1.9K followers 820 following 62 posts

Professor of Political Economy, UCL. She/her. Here to lurk.

Videos
Economics 56%
Political science 25%
Posts Replies Media Videos

lucy-barnes.bsky.social
Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Sep 23
Congratulations!

lucy-barnes.bsky.social
Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Sep 12
100% correct response
lottelydia.bsky.social Charlotte Lydia Riley @lottelydia.bsky.social · Sep 12
lol fuck you
resprofnews.bsky.social Research Professional News @resprofnews.bsky.social · Sep 12
Ministers ‘want to shift funds away from low-quality research’ .

Universities UK president says institutions cannot afford “unfunded hobbyist research”.

www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-u...

Reposted by Lucy Barnes, Jon Dean

lottelydia.bsky.social
Charlotte Lydia Riley @lottelydia.bsky.social · Sep 12
lol fuck you

Reposted by Lucy Barnes, Catherine J. Frieman

eicathomefinn.bsky.social
Margot Finn @eicathomefinn.bsky.social · Aug 20
'Fewer graduates regret going to university than is widely assumed and the public have a more favourable view of universities than people imagine, according to new research.' 1/3
Public vastly overestimate level of ‘graduate regret’, poll finds
New research highlights misconceptions about higher education, with people more positive about universities than is commonly realised
www.timeshighereducation.com

lucy-barnes.bsky.social
Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Aug 8
Almost: some of us got lucky and own it
p-hunermund.com Paul Hünermund @p-hunermund.com · Aug 4
Academia is basically a collection of people who got lucky early on and mistook it for genius. doi.org/10.1073/pnas...

Reposted by Gavin A. Schmidt, Alistair Munro, Mark E. Schaffer , and 7 more

p-hunermund.com
Paul Hünermund @p-hunermund.com · Aug 4
Academia is basically a collection of people who got lucky early on and mistook it for genius. doi.org/10.1073/pnas...

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

gilesyb.bsky.social
Giles Wilkes @gilesyb.bsky.social · Sep 18
I don't believe in any growth strategy that doesn't make clear the political choices being confronted in 'choosing growth'. Here are some of them. freethinkecon.wordpress.com/2024/09/18/p...
Political choices in choosing growth
One of the natural reactions to learning that Labour has a mission to grow the economy is to sneer. Every government wants to grow the economy! Most Budgets announce themselves as being a Budget for G...
freethinkecon.wordpress.com

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

lanyardigan.bsky.social
lanyardigan @lanyardigan.bsky.social · Oct 17
Here’s a fun game I play: it’s called Ignore A Mountain of Positive Feedback and Find One Tiny Negative Thing to Fuckin’ Bum Yourself Out About. I invite you to join, but I’m telling you now I’m basically the best at it

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

julianlimberg.bsky.social
Julian Limberg @julianlimberg.bsky.social · Oct 30
It's budget day and the UK government needs money. What to do? A good time to highlight some recent work in political science on citizens' fiscal policy attitudes. A short thread.

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

jessicacalarco.com
Jess Calarco @jessicacalarco.com · Nov 8
While canvassing, a couple I talked to said they wouldn't pick Harris "because of the interest rates." Probing, it was clear interest rates have little impact on them. It's just a concept that resonated with their sense money isn't as easy for them as they felt it should be. 3/

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

profjanegreen.bsky.social
Jane Green @profjanegreen.bsky.social · Nov 15
Bluesky academics, lets get to know each other! Quote this & tell me: 1) a project you are working on & 2) an odd idea/theory you aren’t working on but keep thinking about

1) how does life stage influence how economics matters politically?
2. How has income as a measure messed up pol sci?
rfrbrghs.bsky.social Rahel Freiburghaus @rfrbrghs.bsky.social · Nov 15
Bluesky academics, lets get to know each other! Quote this & tell me: 1) a project you are working on & 2) an odd idea/theory you aren’t working on but keep thinking about

1) Can state govts /federalism help safeguard democracy?
2) Why are we still forced to make a binary choice re. ballot queries?

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

schubertlexi.bsky.social
Lexi Schubert @schubertlexi.bsky.social · Nov 18
#JMP Alert #EconTwitter

Restful activities can boost productivity, allowing you to earn more by working less. But do people get this trade-off right? In my JMP, we show they don’t.

lexischubert.github.io/uploads/Schu...

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

iandunt.bsky.social
Ian Dunt @iandunt.bsky.social · Nov 29
And then, because this is arguably the most preposterous country on earth, Speaker Lindsay Hoyle says: "Right, thank you everybody. We're going to move on to the ferrets bill if people wish to leave."

Reposted by Peter Levell, Lucy Barnes

timbale.bsky.social
Tim Bale @timbale.bsky.social · Feb 4
Fascinating (no, really!).
The way UK inflation is worked out is changing – and it will matter for everyone
Gathering data on consumer prices and the products we’re really buying will become far more precise, giving a better picture of how we deal with rising costs.
theconversation.com

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

duncanrobinson.bsky.social
Duncan Robinson @duncanrobinson.bsky.social · Mar 27
Who will speak for Henry? “Pity the High Earner, Not Rich Yet”
economist.com/britain/2025...
Who will speak for Henry?
The “High Earner, Not Rich Yet” is the most overlooked voter in British politics
economist.com

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

hetanshah.bsky.social
Hetan Shah @hetanshah.bsky.social · Apr 1
'The proportion who say they have a high interest in news has almost halved in the UK over the last decade, from 70% in 2015 to 38% last year, according to the @reutersinstitute.bsky.social.'
That's why most of us on this platform are a weird sample!
www.theguardian.com/media/2025/a...
Outlets seek fresh strategies as UK poll shows ‘news avoidance’ on the rise
Negative content and distrust among reasons given by audiences as industry works on how to keep them engaged
www.theguardian.com

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

johnmoe.bsky.social
John Moe @johnmoe.bsky.social · Apr 8
I don’t think I ever got more love or hate for anything I’ve written than I did for this on @mcsweeneys.net.

So many clicks and shares as well as people being furious.

www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/wha...
What Your Favorite Sad Dad Band Says About You
The War on Drugs You make your own paella and take super long naps on Saturday. Like over two hours, consistently. You prefer the smallest possible...
www.mcsweeneys.net

Reposted by Lucy Barnes, Peter Jacobs

bencollins.bsky.social
Tim Onion @bencollins.bsky.social · Jul 7
Also talked about The Onion being inefficient on purpose.

www.status.news/p/the-onion-...
What has it been like shifting from reporter to media executive, managing a staff instead of filing stories yourself? And do you write any of the jokes at The Onion? Or are you strictly managing the business? The Onion’s process is deeply, beautifully inefficient. Every day, our writers take 150 headlines into a physical writers room in Chicago and whittle them down to maybe one or two. These people throw away the funniest sentence I will ever write in my life six times by noon every weekday. The point of taking over this place was to preserve this process, which I learned this week is almost assuredly more rigorous than The New York Times. That’s why I don’t touch any of it. I just try to get more people to pay attention to the output, and get our work into different mediums and new places. We brought back the paper, reinvested in the Onion News Network, bought a full page ad in The Times for something they were going to write anyway. The role is to make the world-class work they’re already doing seep into everyday American life more frequently, and that’s working. You actually can do this, you know. You can just try to highlight the beauty of things you like and not try to vampirically extract value at every step. If people get one thing out of this whole Q&A, I hope it’s that. You do not have to make an A.I. version of your own employees that operate at 1.5x speed but produce purely iterative garbage, especially in media and journalism. People don’t actually want that shit. Make a good, human thing and people will bend over backwards to support you. This is a valid way to run a company.

Reposted by Sarah Childs, Jon H. Fiva, Lucy Barnes

teele.bsky.social
Dawn Teele @teele.bsky.social · Jan 25
Hey @polisky.bsky.social #gendersky Friends! Want to PUBLISH papers? please REVIEW. As @mirya.bsky.social says, you owe x3 reviews for # of submissions for the system to work smoothly. @cpsjournal.bsky.social received 120+ submissions from Dec 1 to today and HUNDREDS of reviewer declines. Bad Math.

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

fgenovese.bsky.social
Federica Genovese @fgenovese.bsky.social · Jul 12
yes, next question
Can me and women be just friends by the economist

lucy-barnes.bsky.social
Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Jul 9
Please, God, no

lucy-barnes.bsky.social
Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Jul 9
My hunch is that it is hard to reconcile perceived levels of inequality (high, growing) with the idea that taxes are (sufficiently) progressive

lucy-barnes.bsky.social
Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Jul 8
This, but also for research
bencollins.bsky.social Tim Onion @bencollins.bsky.social · Jul 7
Also talked about The Onion being inefficient on purpose.

www.status.news/p/the-onion-...
What has it been like shifting from reporter to media executive, managing a staff instead of filing stories yourself? And do you write any of the jokes at The Onion? Or are you strictly managing the business? The Onion’s process is deeply, beautifully inefficient. Every day, our writers take 150 headlines into a physical writers room in Chicago and whittle them down to maybe one or two. These people throw away the funniest sentence I will ever write in my life six times by noon every weekday. The point of taking over this place was to preserve this process, which I learned this week is almost assuredly more rigorous than The New York Times. That’s why I don’t touch any of it. I just try to get more people to pay attention to the output, and get our work into different mediums and new places. We brought back the paper, reinvested in the Onion News Network, bought a full page ad in The Times for something they were going to write anyway. The role is to make the world-class work they’re already doing seep into everyday American life more frequently, and that’s working. You actually can do this, you know. You can just try to highlight the beauty of things you like and not try to vampirically extract value at every step. If people get one thing out of this whole Q&A, I hope it’s that. You do not have to make an A.I. version of your own employees that operate at 1.5x speed but produce purely iterative garbage, especially in media and journalism. People don’t actually want that shit. Make a good, human thing and people will bend over backwards to support you. This is a valid way to run a company.

lucy-barnes.bsky.social
Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Jun 21
Very Cirrus People

lucy-barnes.bsky.social
Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Jun 2
populism<->austerity doom loop, anyone?

Reposted by Lyn Robinson, Lucy Barnes

jowolff.bsky.social
Jo Wolff @jowolff.bsky.social · May 29
Want people to understand your academic work better? Answer these questions in your writing:

What are the motivations of this project? (Why do it?)

Who are you arguing against?

What alternatives are you rejecting and why?

What follows if you’re right?

These are also good questions for Q&A.

lucy-barnes.bsky.social
Lucy Barnes @lucy-barnes.bsky.social · Apr 29
Love this but think the gaming element is the cherry; the “seeing like a market” (or if you prefer, the Beatles (can’t buy me love)) is the cake

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

danielsohege.bsky.social
Dan Sohege @danielsohege.bsky.social · Apr 25
Gender neutral spaces have existed for years, we all know that. It isn't trans and non-binary individuals attacking women without any repercussions, that's men. Nothing about demonising trans and non-binary individuals makes women safer. It does make people more vulnerable though. 3/5

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

bjpir.bsky.social
BJPIR @bjpir.bsky.social · Apr 23
📣 New BJPIR article out now!

'The political effects of London’s Ultra Low Emission Zone' by Andrew McNeil and Frieder Mitsch

⬇️ Find the full article in #OpenAccess here: buff.ly/QIn8Bm9

@polstudiesassoc.bsky.social
buff.ly

Reposted by Lucy Barnes

janus.bsky.social
The PS1 startup sound as a lesbian @janus.bsky.social · Apr 22
“define a woman” fine ok, so you know when shania twain says “let’s go girls”? if you go then you’re a woman