Adrian Daub
banner
adriandaub.bsky.social
Adrian Daub
@adriandaub.bsky.social

"Zeitgeistprofessor". Cultural history, gender research at Stanford. Books: WHAT TECH CALLS THINKING (2020); THE CANCEL CULTURE PANIC (2024). WHAT TECH CALLS GOVERNING and PROJECT 1933 (2026). Pod: In Bed With the Right. Newsletter: adriandaub.substack.com .. more

Adrian Daub is a German literary scholar and Professor of German and Comparative Literature at Stanford University, who has served as the Director of Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies and serves as the Barbara D. Finberg Director of the Clayman Institute at Stanford. .. more

Art 52%
Political science 15%
Pinned
It's here! It's here! It's here! THE CANCEL CULTURE PANIC is now out with Stanford University Press! You can buy it wherever you buy books. Or I guess you can talk about it in front of Alexa and she'll order it alongside a bunch of Pamplemousse LaCroix. www.amazon.com/Cancel-Cultu...
NYT gonna NYT: "Both Mr. Mamdani and Mr. Maduro identify as socialists, though they have no relationship.” — would be funny if they did this every time you write about two capitalists.

www.nytimes.com/2026/01/03/w...
Mamdani Called Trump to Criticize Venezuela Strikes
www.nytimes.com
Well, it was either all this or another black person in a Star Wars movie

Maduro is such an idiot. Why engage in actionable conduct like corruption, boating and suppressing the opposition, when he could have simply used starvation as a method of war and could have waltzed right out?
Marco Rubio is reportedly saying Maduro will stand trial in US courts.

Which means it’s now the US administration’s position that US courts can hold foreign presidents, but not the US president, accountable for crimes.

Reposted by Adrian Daub

"we had to bomb Venezuela bc it resisted arrest" is a pretty good one, though. keep innovating, psychotic war state!

Reposted by Adrian Daub

During Musk’s Doge intermezzo, @adriandaub.bsky.social observed Musk lives on the meme imaginary of average internet users, only he is rich. Now we know the military policy of the U.S. administration was conceived watching an old movie almost everyone has seen: www.empireonline.com/movies/featu...
Anatomy Of A Scene: Apocalypse Now
Like all great masterpieces, the years haven't diminished Apocalypse Now -...
www.empireonline.com
I’ve long maintained that it was a mistake for Congress to have abolished itself.
Marco Rubio is reportedly saying Maduro will stand trial in US courts.

Which means it’s now the US administration’s position that US courts can hold foreign presidents, but not the US president, accountable for crimes.
Here is the editor of Tablet agreeably reposting someone calling nonwhite NYC immigrants "worthless biotrash." It's astonishing how quickly this stuff has escaped containment

Reposted by Adrian Daub

Project 1933, a deep month by month dive into 1933 Nazi Germany and what we can learn from it in our current political nightmare, was among my favourite podcasts last year. Hats off @moiradonegan.bsky.social @adriandaub.bsky.social
www.patreon.com/posts/147110...
Episode 114 -- Project 1933, Part X: December 1 - December 31 | In Bed With the Right
Get more from In Bed With the Right on Patreon
www.patreon.com

And the year 2025 was a good reminder of why it is not just a little cultural quirk to designate people as obviously "real" or "authentic" Americans or not. This is the logic of ICE sweeps, and places that don't see themselves as in league with a fascist project should stop replicating it. (6/6)

Again, it sucks to not feel represented by your government (ask me how I know!). But it's clear that political alienation, political frustration, political disenfranchisement receive differential attention depending on who experiences them. And those differences are about who counts as "real". (5/6)

I would struggle to imagine an NYTimes article exploring how San Franciscans feel alienated from the state around them, or Stockton and suburbs (about 800k pop). It's hard not to wonder whether that's partly because Stockton is 50% white and Richvale is 85% white. (4/6)

That region has, by my count, about 700,000 residents today. That's less than the population of San Francisco. The article is about the fact that the priorities and ideas of 700,000 Californians are somehow not reflected in the priorities and ideas of 38.8 million *other* Californians. (3/6)

The piece focuses on Richvale (population 234), and it explicitly invokes the (white supremacist) vision of a new State of Jefferson. Afaik that state was supposed to include Siskiyou, Modoc, Shasta, Del Norte, Lassen, Trinity, Glenn, Tehama, Plumas, Humboldt, Mendocino, Butte, and Colusa. (2/6)

This seems exactly right. I had to think of this recent NYTimes piece. I think it's great that the Times pays attention to California sometimes, and I love NorCal, so happy to see coverage. Still, this is an article all about people feeling politically disenfranchised. (1/6)
Another good practice for the New Year would be for all the non-fascists in America who want to opine about politics to really begin believing that urban America is Real America & that its denizens are The Authentic People. Get some self-respect & drop the volkish nationalist view that they're not
And I think liberals should stop taking the bait and ceding ground on immigration.

Immigration is good. Multiculturalism is good. Free trade is good. Stop being embarrassed to say so.

Reposted by Adrian Daub

Welcome in 2026!
I hope you are having a pleasant start to the new year.
I started by making breakfast and listening to the final episode of @inbedwiththeright.bsky.social Project 1933 series. A striking series going through 1933 month by month and tracing how the Nazis established their power.
There are only 45 million foreign-born people living in the United States right now, about half of whom are naturalized citizens. So this ridiculous edge-lord post by taxpayer-funded trolls is suggesting deporting 55 million native-born citizens.
This should not be shrugged aside. They have stopped with the fake 22 million illegal immigrants things and are flat out saying we want to deport 10's of millions of citizens and legal residents from "third world countries" Basically they are advocating removing 1/3 of the population on a gov site.
This should not be shrugged aside. They have stopped with the fake 22 million illegal immigrants things and are flat out saying we want to deport 10's of millions of citizens and legal residents from "third world countries" Basically they are advocating removing 1/3 of the population on a gov site.

Oh I like that!

💯💯💯

True but good luck to this clown show trying to manufacture consent by just yelling at their public

“Pointing out that we have destroyed important institutions, that we don’t seem to remember or know enough to understand why these were important institutions in the first place is actually like super divisive!”

Call it Bariism. Respect for institutions as perfect tautology: it is due to them because it is their due. It is our duty to accord it because it’s our job to accord it.

There’s something oddly comforting in the fact that, as they hollow out institutions (like SCOTUS and CBS), our vacuous or fash-curious elites can think of no better argument for themselves than “it’s dangerous actually for you not to respect us”.
NEW: Jan Crawford's attack on SCOTUS "corruption" narrative was its own substance-free narrative.

On Face the Nation, CBS News's chief legal correspondent went after Supreme Court critics as "dangerous." And yet, her court defense was completely lacking in specifics.

Tonight, at Law Dork:
Jan Crawford's attack on SCOTUS "corruption" narrative was its own substance-free narrative
On Face the Nation, CBS News's chief legal correspondent went after Supreme Court critics as "dangerous." And yet, her court defense was completely lacking in specifics.
www.lawdork.com
In 1961, the National Review, that bastion of "reasonable conservatism" published a pamphlet by L. Brent Bozell (WFBuckley's bro-in-law) making the menacing argument that Chief Justice Earl Warren deserved a punishment greater than censure or impeachment because he'd "made war against public order."
NEW: Jan Crawford's attack on SCOTUS "corruption" narrative was its own substance-free narrative.

On Face the Nation, CBS News's chief legal correspondent went after Supreme Court critics as "dangerous." And yet, her court defense was completely lacking in specifics.

Tonight, at Law Dork:
Jan Crawford's attack on SCOTUS "corruption" narrative was its own substance-free narrative
On Face the Nation, CBS News's chief legal correspondent went after Supreme Court critics as "dangerous." And yet, her court defense was completely lacking in specifics.
www.lawdork.com

Which is truly perverse in that we're 100% a Wagner household.

When 90s conservatives were freaking out about gay men raising children, this was probably not what they had in mind, but my daughter is atm refusing to fall asleep unless we play her the triumphal march from Aida.

Any academic: Academia has many problems. For instance—

Professor in movie: Oh no, I’ll have to defend myself before all the deans in my department in order to get tenure and finally afford that beach house, but a student of mine uploaded a clip of me stealing a carton of milk to YouTube!