Philosopher at University of Michigan. https://brian.weatherson.org/
Brian Weatherson is the Marshall Weinberg Professor of Philosophy at the University of Michigan. He specializes in epistemology and philosophy of language.
I'll continue this thread when new stuff comes out.
www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.116...
If it's a bad plan though, that won't matter.
Reposted by Brian Weatherson
www.reddit.com/r/melbourne/...
yummyproof.com/en/recept/ve...
Maybe I should try making the veggie version.
You don't often see Belgian food described as the best in the world, and the food doesn't magically change the minute you step across the border.
Another would be to say that the relation between some information and what it supports depends on contingent correlations, not just on logical relations a la Keynes.
I'd have thought a view can be information-sensitive and externalist.
philarchive.org/rec/THOERW-2
Reposted by Brian Weatherson
Millions of people just turn on YouTube at the start of the day and just ... leave it running?
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/23/b...
The Russian navy didn't last a week when Ukraine went to work on it, and there are plenty of countries with more resources than Ukraine.
Surface vessels are just big juicy targets for anyone these days.
I’ve just watched too many cricket games from his pet stadium.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...
Reposted by Anna O. Law, Mark Rice, Brian Weatherson
Reposted by Anna O. Law, David Brady, Linda J. Skitka , and 16 more Anna O. Law, David Brady, Linda J. Skitka, Ian Campbell, Michael J. Allen, Adam Bonica, Karen Benjamin Guzzo, Charles W. Smith, Nazita Lajevardi, Scott A. Imberman, Amy W. Ando, Elizabeth Stevenson, Lisa Diedrich, Brian Weatherson, Alessandro Rigolon, Richard M. Carpiano, Manisha Sinha, Suzanne Conklin Akbari, Nathan P. Kalmoe
🧵 1 of 9
The scale matters, but everyone who thinks the problems are completely new is kidding themselves.
One is that the fakes are a new kind of problem. That’s true, but not worrying (to me). After all, they are so easy to spot. (I can write an LLM prompt that will catch ~100%.)
The other is that the scale has gone up. That’s a bigger deal I feel.
So much of what people dislike about LLMs is really symptoms of rot that was already there. There was always plenty of other evidence of the rot, but it took LLMs to make the evidence impossible to ignore.
Reposted by Brian Weatherson
Reposted by Steven French, Brian Weatherson
@jessiemunton.bsky.social
@oupphilosophy.bsky.social
@stjohnscollege.bsky.social
@leverhulmetrust.bsky.social
global.oup.com/academic/pro...
Reposted by Brian Weatherson
doi.org/10.5840/jphi...
Reposted by Brian Weatherson
Of course it's not put that way, but the characteristics people want are characteristics of well functioning exam boards.
Reposted by Brian Weatherson