Brian Weatherson
banner
bweatherson.bsky.social
Brian Weatherson
@bweatherson.bsky.social

Philosopher at University of Michigan. https://brian.weatherson.org/

Brian Weatherson is the Marshall Weinberg Professor of Philosophy at the University of Michigan. He specializes in epistemology and philosophy of language.

Source: Wikipedia
Philosophy 47%
Psychology 20%
Pinned
This is a thread of things I've recently published, starting with my book from last year, with Open Book Publishers, defending the claim that knowledge is interest-relative.

I'll continue this thread when new stuff comes out.

www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.116...
Knowledge: A Human Interest Story
In this book the author argues for a groundbreaking perspective that knowledge is inherently interest-relative. This means that what one knows is influenced not just by belief, evidence, and truth, bu...
www.openbookpublishers.com

Reposted by Brian Weatherson

Looking forward to be participating at a workshop entitled “Forecasting Rare and Severe Events: Behaviour, Verification, and Judgment” at St Andrews organised by Ian Durbach from the Stats Department—wildly interdisciplinary event. This will be fun

I think the one round means you have to get rid of major revisions. Otherwise this happens way too often

Round 1 reviews: Major revisions - good idea but needs *lots* of work.
R2 reviews: Minor revisions - lots of improvement but still here's a dealbreaker.

What do you do with those R2 reviews?

If I was better with R one question I'd be getting from the data is what ultimately happened with the major revisions.

Outside of Phil Review, I thought they had a pretty high publication rate at most journals, though often after several torturous rounds.

On this model you might expect capital owners who are powerful but not maximally so, and threatened by even larger capital owners, to be a bit more willing to take some risks to decarbonize.

And I think that's what we do see, e.g., younger Elon Musk, or Andrew Forrest.

Reposted by Brian Weatherson

Katherine Hawley is indeed sorely missed here in Philosophy and St Andrews, and it’s good to see her clear and wise reflections on trust and trustworthiness gain a fresh audience.

https://mastodon.social/@kjhealy/115525767271021313
Kieran Healy (@kjhealy@mastodon.social)
A little more about trustworthy data visualization and the work of the philosopher Katherine Hawley. https://kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2025/11/10/trustworthy-data-visualization/
mastodon.social
The online journal Philosophy and the Mind Sciences is doing a symposium on my book, Deflating Mental Representation, based on my Jean Nicod lectures. See the Call for Papers here:
philosophymindscience.org/index.php/ph...
and a précis of the book here:
philpapers.org/rec/EGAPOD
Call for Papers: Book Symposium on "Deflating Mental Representation" by Frances Egan | Philosophy and the Mind Sciences
Philosophy and the Mind Sciences (PhiMiSci) focuses on the interface between philosophy of mind, psychology, and cognitive neuroscience. PhiMiSci is a peer-reviewed, not-for-profit open-access journal...
philosophymindscience.org

Some people are doing some level of this, though mostly to select winners from longlists, so you still need rec letters for determining who gets on longlists.

blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci...
How randomisation has changed the British Academy’s approach to research funding - Impact of Social Sciences
As more research funders adopt randomisation, the British Academy explains why it has used partial randomisation to allocate its Small Research Grants scheme.
blogs.lse.ac.uk

Reposted by Brian Weatherson

The I.R.S. is shutting down its free online system for filing tax returns, a program that the Biden administration introduced last year and that users gave high marks.

via @tarasiegelbernard.bsky.social

www.nytimes.com/2025/11/06/b...
I.R.S. Halts Free Online Offering for Filing Taxes Directly
www.nytimes.com

It's only a short term fix though. A submission generated by a modern LLM with the web search features turned up to maximum should generate an objection letter in 15 minutes that's at most going to have the errors a careful human might make.

Yeah, carelessness with respect to whether it is deceptive should be strong enough, especially if paired with a clear statement that cutting-and-pasting from a chatbot is careless.

Reposted by Brian Weatherson

FWIW my textbook of choice has been for all x Calgary paired with Carnap.io.

I’m super appreciative of the work that the Open Logic Project people have been doing! openlogicproject.org
Welcome To Carnap!
Carnap.io

Reposted by Brian Weatherson

Are there philosophy classes on the ethics on insurance underwriting and pricing ? Seems like you could get a solid semester out of it.
BREAKING: Cornell caved.

Here is the settlement agreement, signed today by the university's president, Michael Kotlikoff: statements.cornell.edu/2025/documen...

Reposted by Brian Weatherson

The timeline in so many of these cases tracks the gpt4o rollout www.nytimes.com/2025/11/06/t...
Lawsuits Blame ChatGPT for Suicides and Harmful Delusions
www.nytimes.com

Reposted by Brian Weatherson

Why is the Associated Press letting a White House official speak anonymously about why Trump pardoned a corrupt Tennessee Republican politician? And for 3 whole paragraphs, providing the defense that he only got $5,000 from his illegal scheme, which makes it OK In Trumpworld.

Reposted by Brian Weatherson

I’m not going to delete mine. I like the web page they made for me too much.

Reposted by Brian Weatherson

Our Immigration and Data Security teams worked together this week to understand how immigration-linked data grabs and shoddy facial recognition apps are laying the groundwork for a surveillance state.

unbreaking.org/blog/this-we...
This week at Unbreaking, November 6 — Unbreaking
Unbreaking is built to be an antidote to information overload. Since we launched, we have been meticulously documenting lawsuits, executive orders, court rulings, countermoves, and other key events.
unbreaking.org

He ran to unseat her last time and lost by 30 points. Shouldn't the focus be on people who have a chance to win?

Yep. A lot of these theories of how to win seem to forget that the other side gets to move.

E.g., If you think the other side is winning on X, so you downplay X, all that happens is that you stay losing on X, and the other side floods the airwaves with ads about X just before the election.
I expand on a rant about the unseriousness of serious politics backofmind.substack.com/p/the-genera...
the generalised problem factory
taking opps research seriously
backofmind.substack.com

Reposted by Brian Weatherson

AltNPS's post is full of the same lurid details and breathless dramatization as their previous attempt at ICE raid erotica from a few weeks ago.

Things that AltNPS could not possibly have witnessed, and which aren't reported anywhere else.
There’s growing evidence that something was going seriously wrong in the classic early work on cognitive dissonance

Latest revelation: The story in When Prophecy Fails seems to have been fabricated in the most egregious way

But this is not the only one…

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1...
Debunking “When Prophecy Fails”
In 1954, Dorothy Martin predicted an apocalyptic flood and promised her followers rescue by flying saucers. When neither arrived, she recanted, her group dissolved, and efforts to proselytize ceased....
onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Is the goat meat stands a promise?!
This guy

I didn't realise @leaypi.bsky.social is doing the Tanner lecture at Michigan this year.

lsa.umich.edu/philosophy/n...
All Events | U-M LSA Philosophy
lsa.umich.edu

The short answer is, someone who resents paying so much in taxes, doesn't like labor regulations (probably because they own a small business), and doesn't want their kid's house to burn down if we keep having once-a-century fires every five years.

Just looking at this map, I'd try candidates like that in CA-22 and 41 (though Prop 50 might take care of those), AZ-8, CO-5, WI-1, MI-7 and 10, maybe PA-7, NY-17, NJ-7.

A pretty good chunk of GOP's closest seats are still suburban.
https://ballotpedia.org/Election_results,_2024:_Congressional_margin_of_victory_analysis#5%_or_less

The richest parts of Melbourne and Sydney, where conservative party leaders used to hold seats, are now dominated by this kind of candidate. No reason it couldn't work in suburban American too.

You'll lose a few rural votes this way, but mostly in places that you've lost long ago.

Even ignoring what's right and wrong, I think this is just bad electoral strategy. There have got to be parts of America where the winning strategy is to be like the Australian teals.

That is, run as the most moderate candidate ever on every issue except environment, where you're radical.
What Democrats need to do is neither embrace the ideas of the Bernie / AOC / Mamdani faction nor obsessively freeze Bernie / AOC / Mamdani out.

What they have to do is be tougher on crime and illegal immigration and prioritize broad-based prosperity over emissions reductions and identity politics.

He bowled, but I haven't seen whether fast or slow.