Michael J. Taylor
banner
drmichaeljtaylor.bsky.social
Michael J. Taylor
@drmichaeljtaylor.bsky.social

Associate Professor, University at Albany SUNY
Greek and Roman History
PhD UC Berkeley

Economics 30%
History 25%

Not all of us have beaten Dark Souls Bret.

Oh yeah. Too bad there is the chink here, but presumably Septer[esmom]? Another "Howler"?

Did convince Frank 1919 (often too credulous, although I have a soft spot for the guy who trained TRS Broughton and LR Taylor).

Oh yeah, triresmos!

And Fay 1920 is not terribly impressed.

The Latin habit of adding "reme" to the number seems to be somewhat later development in Latin (quick L&S search suggests "quinquereme" first in Livy and Cicero, and "trireme" in Caesar and Nepos).

@sdecasien.bsky.social would know more about this than me.

In Greek they are just called "Threes,", "Fives" etc,

"Threes" align both banks of oars and rowers per sweep....so presumably when they moved to "fives" (*probably* 2-2-1 rowers per sweep) they were counting rowers instead of banks.

Without question Rome had a small naval footprint prior to 264-the Antine rams on the rostra, the duumviri navales, the squadron in Tarentum, etc.--. So there's institutional no-how about how to build and operate warships. But the fleet construction program in 261/0 is still a major intensification.

Carthaginian naval supremacy pre-264 basically seems to be vaporware. Can't stop Agathocles invading Africa, can't stop the Romans from crossing the straights, and loses the first set of major fleet engagements to Rome between 260-255.

Rome has no major fleet until 264, but then suddenly builds one and instantly challenges Carthage on the water.

During the Second Punic War, Carthage has a significant fleet, but never bothers to challenge Roman naval superiority.

Absolutely. And Carthage never wants to make the trade-off really necessary to beat Rome, which would basically be incorporating Libyans into the state on a more equal footing ( @dominicmachado.bsky.social and I have some thoughts forthcoming)

Also, the story Carthaginian power is quite meme-able

It seems to me the main problem is that Carthage only bothers to develop into a superpower in response to Rome (especially the final Barcid configuration), and by then it's too late.

Seems like he gets paid because rich people like the way he's wrong....

Reposted by Michael J. Taylor

If you want a good summary of what we know about when various bits of Roman kit are showing up in Italy, @drmichaeljtaylor.bsky.social 's "Panoply and Identity During the Roman Republic" PBSR 88 (2020): 31-65 has a good rundown of the often scattered and difficult evidence.

Seems like something Princeton should teach?

Reposted by Michael J. Taylor

Since we're apparently debating the popularity of military history, the department I generally teach for probably fills close to 300 seats of military history each year.

It also has no tenure lines assigned to the field and no intention to assign any in the future.

Reposted by Michael J. Taylor

We don’t teach military history at Princeton.

For a while Jim McPherson and John Murrin did a great “war and society” course, but even then it was a seminar with a dozen students.
I don’t know how things are at Harvard, where Hankins is, but I can tell you that military history is popular, but not uniquely so, at my public university.
90% of military history is about where the latrines are dug. You cannot make war if you have dysentery.

At least you got to keep the book, right…..?
a man in a suit is standing in a field of grass
ALT: a man in a suit is standing in a field of grass
media.tenor.com

To what extent would illegally spending money constitute a crime (Fraud against the United States or the like)?
UAlbany, one of those, NY state universities, has been hovering around 4 percent tenure track Black faculty since ever. I am THE Black tenure track political scientists. These folks are just little liars.
You’ll never guess who else experienced ‘racism’ on the job market despite their unimpeachable academic credentials.
You’ll never guess who else experienced ‘racism’ on the job market despite their unimpeachable academic credentials.

AI is just terrible at Roman stuff, in no small part because a lot of its training set seems to be 1950s Sword and Sandal epics.

One reason among many to never use AI!
I’m increasingly uneasy about the flood of AI images on social media. They are mostly absurd and frustrating. They may sometimes be creative experiments, but the fact that so many users take them at face value says a lot about our collective loss of visual literacy.

www.facebook.com/groups/ancie...

Reposted by Michael J. Taylor

I’m increasingly uneasy about the flood of AI images on social media. They are mostly absurd and frustrating. They may sometimes be creative experiments, but the fact that so many users take them at face value says a lot about our collective loss of visual literacy.

www.facebook.com/groups/ancie...

Yes. Disbanding ICE is the small-c conservative position at this point.

We call our family act T̶h̶e̶ ̶A̶r̶i̶s̶t̶o̶c̶r̶a̶t̶s̶ "The Crime-Fighters."

Absolutely mandatory reading on the Republican Roman army.

Annual repost of my thread on Hasmonean military equipment. ]

Happy Hanukkah!
I celebrate Xmas by family tradition, but as a military historian of the Hellenistic (c. 300-100 BCE) Mediterranean, Hanukkah is the holiday that falls within my professional bailiwick.

So, a Hanukkah themed military history 🧵

And they even have a foundational epic about a siege where it’s very clear no one knows how a siege actually works, except maybe Andromache.

Bad news, the Visigoths are also heretics.

😆