Reposted by Tuxie
Earlier today, I was notified that someone was at my door.
This is who it was:
This is who it was:
November 21, 2025 at 12:59 AM
Earlier today, I was notified that someone was at my door.
This is who it was:
This is who it was:
Reposted by Tuxie
50 years ago today, this photo of the Chicago press conference for One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest was taken.
In the background you can see Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert — in the clothes they wore in the Siskel & Ebert pilot, which was also shot that same day.
In the background you can see Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert — in the clothes they wore in the Siskel & Ebert pilot, which was also shot that same day.
November 20, 2025 at 6:01 PM
50 years ago today, this photo of the Chicago press conference for One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest was taken.
In the background you can see Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert — in the clothes they wore in the Siskel & Ebert pilot, which was also shot that same day.
In the background you can see Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert — in the clothes they wore in the Siskel & Ebert pilot, which was also shot that same day.
Reposted by Tuxie
SOME local news outlets would look upon the end of the NYC mayoral as a chance to kick back and recuperate.
BUT NOT @hellgatenyc.com !!!
Because secretly this whole time we've been working on a MASSIVE UPDATE TO THE TABLE OF SUCCESS.
Welcome to THE LAST SUPPER.
tableofsuccess.hellgatenyc.com
BUT NOT @hellgatenyc.com !!!
Because secretly this whole time we've been working on a MASSIVE UPDATE TO THE TABLE OF SUCCESS.
Welcome to THE LAST SUPPER.
tableofsuccess.hellgatenyc.com
November 17, 2025 at 7:13 PM
SOME local news outlets would look upon the end of the NYC mayoral as a chance to kick back and recuperate.
BUT NOT @hellgatenyc.com !!!
Because secretly this whole time we've been working on a MASSIVE UPDATE TO THE TABLE OF SUCCESS.
Welcome to THE LAST SUPPER.
tableofsuccess.hellgatenyc.com
BUT NOT @hellgatenyc.com !!!
Because secretly this whole time we've been working on a MASSIVE UPDATE TO THE TABLE OF SUCCESS.
Welcome to THE LAST SUPPER.
tableofsuccess.hellgatenyc.com
Reposted by Tuxie
not to beat a dead horse but they do this not out of some belief about maximizing electoral returns but out of an aversion to rhetorically committing themselves to doing something about epstein/corruption/ICE/whatever other issue they’re avoiding, should they win power back
The usual suspects are telling Dems that Epstein won’t win elections, get back to “affordability” and I think my head might explode. www.offmessage.net/p/force-a-re...
Force A Referendum On The Epstein Coverup
It divides Republicans much more than "affordability" or any other economic issue.
www.offmessage.net
November 15, 2025 at 5:29 PM
not to beat a dead horse but they do this not out of some belief about maximizing electoral returns but out of an aversion to rhetorically committing themselves to doing something about epstein/corruption/ICE/whatever other issue they’re avoiding, should they win power back
Nothing Talia says supports this guy's interpretation. "Luxury" housing that's shoddily constructed is a known issue. Rich people buying/renting apartments they don't live in is a known issue.
You have to ignore the pro-new-housing first half of the post to get mad at her about it.
You have to ignore the pro-new-housing first half of the post to get mad at her about it.
November 13, 2025 at 4:01 AM
Nothing Talia says supports this guy's interpretation. "Luxury" housing that's shoddily constructed is a known issue. Rich people buying/renting apartments they don't live in is a known issue.
You have to ignore the pro-new-housing first half of the post to get mad at her about it.
You have to ignore the pro-new-housing first half of the post to get mad at her about it.
Reposted by Tuxie
Pretty much all affordability discourse could benefit from just posting this chart.
If you're in the better off America, all the luxury goods you want in excess are for the most part much cheaper. If you're in the poorer America, most of the shit you need to live/grow is more expensive.
If you're in the better off America, all the luxury goods you want in excess are for the most part much cheaper. If you're in the poorer America, most of the shit you need to live/grow is more expensive.
November 10, 2025 at 2:53 PM
Pretty much all affordability discourse could benefit from just posting this chart.
If you're in the better off America, all the luxury goods you want in excess are for the most part much cheaper. If you're in the poorer America, most of the shit you need to live/grow is more expensive.
If you're in the better off America, all the luxury goods you want in excess are for the most part much cheaper. If you're in the poorer America, most of the shit you need to live/grow is more expensive.
Reposted by Tuxie
i don’t play pundit and try to guess how stuff will play to voters whose politics generally make no sense to me, but if ending the shutdown was about the important business of getting SNAP benefits and air travel back online, it also rewards hostage taking in a way that seems pretty ominous to me
November 10, 2025 at 4:12 AM
i don’t play pundit and try to guess how stuff will play to voters whose politics generally make no sense to me, but if ending the shutdown was about the important business of getting SNAP benefits and air travel back online, it also rewards hostage taking in a way that seems pretty ominous to me
Reposted by Tuxie
Important to understand this. There's a reasonable chance that your Dem Senator who voted against it and is acting mad now was in on the play. It's the same reason why they scheduled the surrender for AFTER the election this week. They didn't want people pissed at Dems right before an election.
The caucus meeting was just to orchestrate who would fall on the sword but not be up for a vote in 2026.
so currently defectors are:
Kaine (2030)
Shaheen (Retiring)
Hasan (2028)
Fetterman (2028)
Durbin (Retiring)
CCM (2028)
Rosen (2030)
King (2030)
Kaine (2030)
Shaheen (Retiring)
Hasan (2028)
Fetterman (2028)
Durbin (Retiring)
CCM (2028)
Rosen (2030)
King (2030)
November 10, 2025 at 2:11 AM
Important to understand this. There's a reasonable chance that your Dem Senator who voted against it and is acting mad now was in on the play. It's the same reason why they scheduled the surrender for AFTER the election this week. They didn't want people pissed at Dems right before an election.
Reposted by Tuxie
Dems backed Trump into a corner where he’s advocating for starving Americans and hemorrhaging support. If they vote to let him off the hook in exchange for nothing it’s a cataclysmic failure. I know people are in pain but insulating Republicans from political consequences is not the answer.
November 9, 2025 at 10:58 PM
Dems backed Trump into a corner where he’s advocating for starving Americans and hemorrhaging support. If they vote to let him off the hook in exchange for nothing it’s a cataclysmic failure. I know people are in pain but insulating Republicans from political consequences is not the answer.
Reposted by Tuxie
Sooooo, he's not actually opposed to it. He helped pick senators who are safe or retiring to vote yes. That way he and the others can put on a little show of opposition.
Schumer: "I must vote no. I can not, in good faith, support this CR. ... Make no mistake about it, the American people know who is inflicting this pain on them."
He stops short of urging his colleagues to vote "no."
He stops short of urging his colleagues to vote "no."
November 10, 2025 at 1:57 AM
Sooooo, he's not actually opposed to it. He helped pick senators who are safe or retiring to vote yes. That way he and the others can put on a little show of opposition.
Reposted by Tuxie
If the Dems will cave on this there is no right of yours that they will not throw away if it means they can go on vacation.
I hate them with my whole heart.
I hate them with my whole heart.
November 10, 2025 at 12:31 AM
If the Dems will cave on this there is no right of yours that they will not throw away if it means they can go on vacation.
I hate them with my whole heart.
I hate them with my whole heart.
Reposted by Tuxie
I love playing "Malice or Cowardice?" every day. it's my favorite game
November 10, 2025 at 12:39 AM
I love playing "Malice or Cowardice?" every day. it's my favorite game
Reposted by Tuxie
LMAO. It's all FAKE. They are absolutely fucking with you.
*SCHUMER SAYS HE IS VOTING 'NO' ON GOP BILL
November 10, 2025 at 12:43 AM
LMAO. It's all FAKE. They are absolutely fucking with you.
Reposted by Tuxie
agreeing to make a terrible deal while your main opponent is quite literally being boo'd on live tv by an entire stadium of people is the kind of political instinct you'd normally only find in a 3 week old dead goldfish
November 10, 2025 at 12:36 AM
agreeing to make a terrible deal while your main opponent is quite literally being boo'd on live tv by an entire stadium of people is the kind of political instinct you'd normally only find in a 3 week old dead goldfish
Reposted by Tuxie
Zohran says you’re trans now
November 5, 2025 at 5:04 PM
Zohran says you’re trans now
Reposted by Tuxie
Journalism can be a thankless job but every now and then you get to ask the guy who threw his shoes at Bush what he thinks about Cheney's death and it's all worth it again
November 5, 2025 at 10:50 AM
Journalism can be a thankless job but every now and then you get to ask the guy who threw his shoes at Bush what he thinks about Cheney's death and it's all worth it again
Reposted by Tuxie
"New York will remain a city of immigrants, a city built by immigrants, powered by immigrants, and as of tonight led by an immigrant." - @zohrankmamdani.bsky.social
Mamdani: So hear me, President Trump, when I say this: to get to any of us, you will have to get through all of us.
November 5, 2025 at 5:05 AM
"New York will remain a city of immigrants, a city built by immigrants, powered by immigrants, and as of tonight led by an immigrant." - @zohrankmamdani.bsky.social
Reposted by Tuxie
Brad Lander just going pure sicko mode after he cross endorsed Mamdani is the funniest sub-plot of this entire campaign
Moreover, ICE must be destroyed
Moreover, ICE must be destroyed
Brad Lander is at the victory party and, folks, he has the custom one-of-one “GOOD FUCKING RIDDANCE” shirt.
November 5, 2025 at 4:33 AM
Brad Lander just going pure sicko mode after he cross endorsed Mamdani is the funniest sub-plot of this entire campaign
Moreover, ICE must be destroyed
Moreover, ICE must be destroyed
Reposted by Tuxie
Brad Lander is at the victory party and, folks, he has the custom one-of-one “GOOD FUCKING RIDDANCE” shirt.
November 5, 2025 at 3:55 AM
Brad Lander is at the victory party and, folks, he has the custom one-of-one “GOOD FUCKING RIDDANCE” shirt.
Reposted by Tuxie
This to me is the game. I don’t care if Schumer doesn’t like Mamdani, but for him to stand silently by while sex pest Cuomo leans into gutter racism and Islamophobia while accepting endorsements from Trump, Musk and Miller is outrageous from the Senate Minority Leader.
Schumer had a chance to repudiate the gutter racism and Islamophobia of Cuomo's campaign and he just fucking didn't. And that is disqualifying. He should be ashamed and we the voters should make sure he feels that shame.
Reporter: Today is election day in New York City. Did you vote for Mamdani or Cuomo?
Schumer: Look, I voted. And I look forward to working with the next mayor to help New York City.
Schumer: Look, I voted. And I look forward to working with the next mayor to help New York City.
November 4, 2025 at 10:31 PM
This to me is the game. I don’t care if Schumer doesn’t like Mamdani, but for him to stand silently by while sex pest Cuomo leans into gutter racism and Islamophobia while accepting endorsements from Trump, Musk and Miller is outrageous from the Senate Minority Leader.
Reposted by Tuxie
I had thought most of my naive idealism had been stomped out of me by now, but it’s amazing to me that this level of public animosity could be directed by Democratic leadership toward a sweet and personable young candidate of their own party seemingly exclusively because of his background.
Q: It's election day in NYC. Did you vote for Mamdani or Cuomo?
Schumer: "Look, I voted, and I look forward to working with the next mayor to help NYC."
Schumer: "Look, I voted, and I look forward to working with the next mayor to help NYC."
November 4, 2025 at 9:41 PM
I had thought most of my naive idealism had been stomped out of me by now, but it’s amazing to me that this level of public animosity could be directed by Democratic leadership toward a sweet and personable young candidate of their own party seemingly exclusively because of his background.
Reposted by Tuxie
Schumer is plainly just a massive bigot. he will not support a Muslim for elected office
Q: It's election day in NYC. Did you vote for Mamdani or Cuomo?
Schumer: "Look, I voted, and I look forward to working with the next mayor to help NYC."
Schumer: "Look, I voted, and I look forward to working with the next mayor to help NYC."
November 4, 2025 at 9:16 PM
Schumer is plainly just a massive bigot. he will not support a Muslim for elected office
Reposted by Tuxie
Boy Mamdani's race is really a vivid reminder that anti-Islamic bigotry is 100% accepted in US public discourse. People don't even bother dog whistling, it's just right out in the open.
November 4, 2025 at 8:09 PM
Boy Mamdani's race is really a vivid reminder that anti-Islamic bigotry is 100% accepted in US public discourse. People don't even bother dog whistling, it's just right out in the open.
I did this!
It's a cool sticker.
It's a cool sticker.
November 3, 2025 at 7:37 PM
I did this!
It's a cool sticker.
It's a cool sticker.