Any legal commentary is not legal advice or the official position of anyone in particular, but a secret third thing.
Elizabeth Warren's observation also underpins the argument as to why it is right for the rich to say their fair share of tax.
"I would rather be an actual pawn. At least pawn sacrifices are calculated and achieve something. All this for a fucking meaningless vote."
"I would rather be an actual pawn. At least pawn sacrifices are calculated and achieve something. All this for a fucking meaningless vote."
"I can't be rich unless you let me steal from you."
This is how Broligarchs differ from oligarchs of yore: the latter tried to hide their thievery; the Broligarchs trumpet their entitlement to steal as a natural right.
"I can't be rich unless you let me steal from you."
This is how Broligarchs differ from oligarchs of yore: the latter tried to hide their thievery; the Broligarchs trumpet their entitlement to steal as a natural right.
I see twenty thousand people a day, and maybe two of them are assholes. Even on a stressful day, even in an unfamiliar environment, even hungry and tired and on a timer.
That's a *much* better ratio than folks realize.
Content moderation of any group larger than maybe 1000 people is also very hard. For some reason most people think it's easy.
Content moderation of any group larger than maybe 1000 people is also very hard. For some reason most people think it's easy.
It can’t happen here, you say. But it is happening.
1) Find where they publicly said Dems want healthcare for illegals [sic] and--in the most aggrieved voice possible--berate them for claiming their constituents who rely on ACA are not real Americans.
1) Find where they publicly said Dems want healthcare for illegals [sic] and--in the most aggrieved voice possible--berate them for claiming their constituents who rely on ACA are not real Americans.
(Updated Version)
(Updated Version)
1/2
1/2
Administration : so the answer was obvious
Administration : so the answer was obvious