He wants to show a commitment to what he campaigned on, he's welcome, but I'm not extending faith till I see that.
He wants to show a commitment to what he campaigned on, he's welcome, but I'm not extending faith till I see that.
“At each gas station where the agents stopped to use the restroom, groups of agitators appeared, yelled at them, stalked them, and even tried to prevent law enforcement vehicles from leaving…”
It has been accepted for generations that the only thing which can authorize agents to break into your home is a warrant signed by a judge. No wonder ICE hid this memo!
based: "its already january??? wowe 🤤"
based: "its already january??? wowe 🤤"
(I think this is probably correct, I just hate it)
(I think this is probably correct, I just hate it)
www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/art...
www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/art...
Still; not even citing an incident just opens the door for arbitrary and inscrutable moderation. It's not defensible in any way.
Don't know which post(s) actually triggered it, b/c it seems Bluesky opted for the Meta/Threads approach of not telling you.
Which makes the "appeal" a bit meaningless, but so it goes 🤷♂️
bsky.app/profile/b000...
Still; not even citing an incident just opens the door for arbitrary and inscrutable moderation. It's not defensible in any way.
I would have preferred to avoid this but we're here now
I would have preferred to avoid this but we're here now
Well, let's take a step back and see if we can figure out why that statement might not exactly be exculpatory, shall we?
Well, let's take a step back and see if we can figure out why that statement might not exactly be exculpatory, shall we?
Paid American protestors would stand out. Just a bit.
Paid American protestors would stand out. Just a bit.