Using race to help minorities? Bad. Using it to discriminate against them? Very, very good.
apparent 6-3 ruling with the liberals in dissent @courthousenews.bsky.social
Using race to help minorities? Bad. Using it to discriminate against them? Very, very good.
Supreme Court: But you didn’t theoretically presume good faith!
Supreme Court: But you didn’t theoretically presume good faith!
*student submits opinion in psych class
*gets bad grade
*instructor says she can make whatever arguments she wants but must draw on empirical sources
*student & Turning Point says her religious freedom & first amendment rights violated
*professor suspended
*student submits opinion in psych class
*gets bad grade
*instructor says she can make whatever arguments she wants but must draw on empirical sources
*student & Turning Point says her religious freedom & first amendment rights violated
*professor suspended
She wasn't even flying internationally. She was flying to Texas.
There must be consequences.
*one DOGE faction was planning the future of the US government at a venture capital firm
*illegally communicating on Signal to avoid transparency laws was deeply embedded into organizational culture to be taken for granted
There must be consequences.
www.theguardian.com/society/2025...
One agent shot Martinez, with evidence presented to the court that he later bragged about in text messages.
GO.
Loevy: "When you tear gas somebody … and they try to kick the tear gas canister away from them, that's assaulting?"
Hewson: "Yes."
Loevy: "When you tear gas somebody … and they try to kick the tear gas canister away from them, that's assaulting?"
Hewson: "Yes."