Jeff Hodges
banner
jmhodges.bsky.social
Jeff Hodges
@jmhodges.bsky.social
I like to be called Jeff.

https://www.somethingsimilar.com
San Francisco, CA
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
downwardly mobile educated alienated elite-adjacents clearly are a large part of the contemporary american left's constituency, but it's such a stupid thing to have a complex about or considering particularly damming. read like any history book ever about who starts political movements.
November 14, 2025 at 4:32 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
same with YIMBY stuff. yeah, it's the most privileged people still being squeezed by the problem who usually lead efforts against it. do you think the leadership of historical political movements were representative cross-sections of the people impacted?
November 14, 2025 at 4:38 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
does this look like extremely buttoned down responsible journalism to you? or does it look like something else. and not in service of cutting corners to get a massive scoop
NYT editors put "Claudine Gay" in "top 5 featured on the New York Times homepage Dec 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 22, 25"

(While they put Trump calling for Constitution's "termination" on page 15 and his chief of staff's "tyrant" warning on 12)

Christopher Rufo openly bragged about the plans!
Chris Rufo "a total product of right-wing affirmative action and you literally would never have heard of him if he was a liberal"
bsky.app/profile/chri...

NYT front page coverage all the time!

By powerful, mediocre editors who push "meritocracy" narrative yet hired each other with legacy privilege
November 13, 2025 at 9:16 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
"We are seeing a 1000x reduction in memory safety vulnerability density compared to Android’s C and C++ code...with Rust changes having a 4x lower rollback rate and spending 25% less time in code review, the safer path is now also the faster one."

security.googleblog.com/2025/11/rust...
Rust in Android: move fast and fix things
Posted by Jeff Vander Stoep, Android Last year, we wrote about why a memory safety strategy that focuses on vulnerability prevention in ...
security.googleblog.com
November 14, 2025 at 1:12 AM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
I always get a kick out of the NYT Defense Squad trotting out harrumphing takes about how serious journalists don't report on mere speculation, blow things out of proportion, dig into their colleagues' email, etc etc
November 13, 2025 at 7:44 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
and that can be true! but then you open the actual newspaper and it's soft-focus profiles of Chris Rufo, a frenzied transphobic crusade, an all-out effort to get the first Black woman president of Harvard canned over bullshit, Get Zohran, etc etc
November 13, 2025 at 7:47 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
There's a tendency among a certain type of poster to assume everything they hate about politics and the state can be blamed on avarice, and I'm here to tell you it's actually worse than that.
I continue to disagree with this. The goal of mass detention is mass deportations. A private prison company leasing 100 beds to ICE gets paid the same if the beds are filled by 100 people for a year each or 1,000 people for a few days each. They don't earn more with long-term detention.
It's not about deporting them. It's about detaining them indefinitely and enriching Prisons for Profiteers and the grift the Convict in the Oval Office collects per detainee.
November 13, 2025 at 10:29 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
November 13, 2025 at 12:59 AM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
Grijalva: That is why I will sign the discharge petition right now to release the Epstein files. Justice cannot wait another day.
November 12, 2025 at 9:26 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
This isn’t even the stuff they’re trying to actually stop from getting out.
November 12, 2025 at 10:59 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
Like I dunno, maybe the reason it took a lady to break open the story of all the men protecting the dude trafficking underage girls is because the male journos were all emailing him making jokes about it?
November 12, 2025 at 8:09 PM
William Gibson being extremely unconcerned about the Epstein files on this app is one small bit of relief
November 12, 2025 at 10:17 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
Also, very funny how the Dems keep trying to do this “release the Epstein files!” thing as a naked base pander in mimicry of the other side’s conspiratorial muckraking, and then the files actually do get released, and it’s like “oh wait Trump really is all over these things, he really did it huh”
November 12, 2025 at 8:35 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
Another thing this email trove has convinced me of is that NYT has been actively and consciously helping Trump since 2015. It wasn't just casual sexism, double standards, and political reporting Kayfabe. They were doing catch and kill
November 12, 2025 at 8:07 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
It just wasn't a big, newsworthy deal like, for instance, the college applications of a mayoral candidate to a school he didn't get into or attend.
To recap: Jeffrey Epstein offered a NY Times reporter photos taken in Epstein's kitchen of Donald Trump and girls in bikinis *and* implored the NYT reporter to put this information in the public discourse in 2015

What did the NY Times editors know about this offer?
“would you like photos of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen?” -Jeffrey Epstein
November 12, 2025 at 9:38 PM
I need to start a private doc for who I think are grifters and why. The same names keep popping up and all I can remember is the vibe
November 12, 2025 at 9:18 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
Oh yeah
November 12, 2025 at 8:49 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
something I keep going back to is "in what world could we have convinced people that basically ~everything popularly believed about 'RussiaGate' was, in essence, true and effect *actual* consequences for it against Trump" and the reality is it never happens because we don't have a functioning senate
NEW: Jeffrey Epstein said in emails that he had been advising the Russian government on how to deal with Donald Trump, one of several cases in which he wielded his connections to try to influence the course of foreign affairs. w @nahaltoosi

www.politico.com/news/2025/11...
November 12, 2025 at 8:51 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
”We have to compromise. I trust the good faith of-“

*grabs mic*

“THE PRESIDENT FUCKS KIDS AND I HAVE PROOF.“
November 12, 2025 at 3:46 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
We gotta have a clear term for people so cynical they become gullible.
November 12, 2025 at 4:55 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
The Iron Law of Trump is "No matter how bad you think it is, it's worse" and it's never failed once.
November 12, 2025 at 5:57 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
if this is bluesky trying to get around how sarah posted on her substack that she had no idea why she was suspended then they're going against their whole "we don't consider off network information" reasoning for why singal is allowed to stay so that's fun
November 12, 2025 at 7:38 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
I think the struggle here is folks wanting transparency like a judicial system but not realizing that a non-government body doesn't have the same protections from libel for making an accusation. Maybe it makes sense here tactically, but the precedent is actually not one they can follow through on
November 12, 2025 at 8:12 PM
Reposted by Jeff Hodges
Maybe you and I are thinking like people from a bigger org. SomethingAwful existed for quite a while with suspension reasons being public-ish. But, woof, there's going to be some "politician DMs minor things that they shouldn't" stuff that comes
November 12, 2025 at 8:13 PM
Suspension reasons are sometimes also libel (like, in the extreme case, incorrectly saying they posted child sexual abuse material). If you're only willing to say sometimes, the lack of saying allows people to "figure out" what the reason was. You just don't talk about suspension reasons. You don't.
regardless of the specific policy being violated or the enforcement procedure, publicly discussing suspension reasons is such a rookie move
November 12, 2025 at 7:54 PM