Why?
flisspart2.bsky.social
Why?
@flisspart2.bsky.social
Movies and doomposting and whatever else tickles me. 🔞
Reposted by Why?
Hes actually going with "Nobody knew" lmfao
February 5, 2026 at 11:21 AM
Just very funny that the British government will be sinked by a scandal which was foreseen by Twitter users like "LeninsDaddy86".
February 5, 2026 at 12:46 PM
Reposted by Why?
Wes Streeting wants people to forget. Never let him forget.
February 5, 2026 at 8:58 AM
Reposted by Why?
Really nuts how many men were like "Me Too went too far, and I need to email Jeffrey Epstein about it."
February 5, 2026 at 12:26 AM
Reposted by Why?
Farage 6/11/24: "Mandelson, in my view, could be a viable candidate for the ambassadorial role. He's an intelligent figure who knows his brief well, as I saw when he worked with the EC. While I'm not certain he's the ideal fit for dealing with Trump... his intellect would at least command respect”
Left: Nigel Farage criticising Keir Starmer and Morgan McSweeney over Peter Mandelson, "The warnings were there.. How many more warnings.. A grave error of judgment.. In politics you always get the odd bad apple in a political party"
February 3, 2026 at 9:06 PM
Reposted by Why?
So many men named in the Epstein files say "I was only emailing him for financial advice, something I now hugely regret of course" and then the email is "hi j-dawg, loved partying with you and the naughty little girls this weekend, same again soon, bestie?" and Epstein replying "me am sayy yse . !1"
February 3, 2026 at 12:04 PM
Harry Potter and the Statutory Rape
Following the release of the Epstein files Jk Rowling has deleted a decade of port logs belonging to the Super yacht Samsara.

What is she hiding?
February 3, 2026 at 3:34 PM
Reposted by Why?
starmer is hilarious: Mandelson can only be removed from Lords by an Act of Parliament, so you can see why, as Prime Minister, there is nothing I can do
February 2, 2026 at 1:35 PM
Reposted by Why?
Annie Wilkes from Misery is spiritually Millennial:
▪️cottagecore
▪️extremely toxic fandom
▪️aggressive side part
▪️weird childish curses
▪️puritanical, but also
▪️horrifyingly perverted

RIP Annie you would have been so good at BookTok
January 28, 2026 at 3:08 AM
Reposted by Why?
wasn’t expecting clegg to suffer worse twink death than cameron
January 28, 2026 at 6:03 PM
Reposted by Why?
Remember when variety downplayed Sinners' opening weekend box office, implying it might not make back its money? It has made $370 million since, and now has garnered more Oscar nominations than any movie, ever
January 22, 2026 at 2:44 PM
People trying to turn Hamnet into the Oscar villain of the awards season when F1 is nominated for Best Picture, a film precisely maybe two people have heard of.
January 22, 2026 at 2:14 PM
Reposted by Why?
Whatever you might think of Maduro, the seizure and kidnapping of a head of state takes us to a very dark place. Vast, arbitrary, extra-legal power, which could be exercised almost anywhere, regardless of the character of the target government.
January 3, 2026 at 10:14 AM
Reposted by Why?
If you think of AI as a technology for powerful people and institutions to remove accountability for their actions, then it starts to make a lot more sense.
January 2, 2026 at 9:17 PM
Reposted by Why?
Elon Musk's vanity AI admitted to generating child sexual abuse imagery and it won't get as much attention from the New York Times as whatever panic about trans people they're trying to incite this week
so x dot com’s ai generated CSAM and they admitted it may violate US law and … i haven’t seen in anyone in power say much at all or call to stop using the platform
January 2, 2026 at 9:20 PM
Reposted by Why?
Others use these drugs and there's evidence that it is better than leaving trans people in distress without treatment... "this does not sit comfortably with him".

Is no one else startled by the Health Minister openly admitting discomfort with the concept of alleviating distress to trans people?
Streeting has already interfered by careful selection of “researchers” associated with a designated anti-trans hate group to carry out an unethical and pseudoscientific “trial” designed to get the result he wants.
December 12, 2025 at 10:59 AM
Reposted by Why?
“Looking directly into another person’s eyes while being physically intimate is a sick and unholy act,” said Utah Gov. Spencer Cox
Utah Bans Eye Contact During Sex
SALT LAKE CITY—With top lawmakers championing the measure as a restoration of Christian values currently under attack in mainstream America, the Utah State Legislature passed a bill Monday that bans a...
theonion.com
December 5, 2025 at 12:30 AM
Nice that they turned a public toilet into a house.
Oh shit waddup
December 1, 2025 at 9:35 PM
Reposted by Why?
Reposted by Why?
I do love being called an angel 🖤
November 25, 2025 at 5:15 PM
Reposted by Why?
At my partner of ten years funeral her entire family deadnamed and misgendered her, then all turned on me when I kicked off about it. The families of trans folk are the *last* people to go to to understand how to respect and remember us.
Do you not think it's bizarre to have strangers on the internet decide they know better than Brianna's own loved ones on what is or isn't insulting to her memory?

I've got no time for Rosie Duffield, but she turned up at a drop-in event in Parliament and that's been the limit of her involvement.
November 12, 2025 at 8:11 AM
Reposted by Why?
In GenAI bubble news, only 2% of Canadian firms are seeing a return on their investment in GenAI. Firms are struggling to find an effective use for the tech & to see promised gains. Maybe time to reconsider the AI hype?
www.theglobeandmail.com/business/art...
Just 2% of Canadian businesses got return on generative AI investments, survey shows
KPMG poll finds only a handful of businesses seeing benefits from technology despite widespread adoption
www.theglobeandmail.com
November 19, 2025 at 5:51 PM
If you look me in the eyes and tell me to vote for these people, I'll consider you no better than a Reform voter.
The Sun has been told Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood will on Monday propose confiscating jewellery, watches, necklaces from asylum seekers to meet asylum costs

This reflects the most controversial aspect of the Danish scheme - the Jewellery Law. The toughest Labour MPs thought this was OTT
November 17, 2025 at 8:06 AM
Reposted by Why?
I am going to become the fucking joker. you are a Labour MP. are you on drugs that make you a fucking ghoul?
November 17, 2025 at 7:18 AM