Daniel Zappala
banner
zappala.bsky.social
Daniel Zappala
@zappala.bsky.social

human-centered security research at BYU

Computer science 80%
Sociology 6%

Very disappointing loss for my team 😢
The ACM Digital Library, where a LOT of computing-related research is published (I'd say at least 75% of my own publications), is now not only providing (without consent of the authors and without opt-in by readers) AI-generated summaries of papers, but they appear as the *default* over abstracts.

I was struck by how white nationalism is woven throughout this document. It is the motivating ideology behind the strategy’s antipathy toward Europe and the desire to assert dominance in our hemisphere.

I also wonder if there is a realistic way for them to document a research process so we can see that their own work led directly to the written words, though this seems onerous.

I’m pondering a requirement that when they turn in a report, they also turn in a handwritten paragraph that copies out verbatim the AI policy for the class, with a signature attesting they followed it.

I am sad that the tech industry took no thought or care for the havoc they would wreak before unleashing this tool, nor taken any steps to curb academic misconduct.

Very considerate!

I’m curious what you do with a turkey done that early?

Reposted by Daniel Zappala

🚀💫 I’m on the job market for academic (tenure-track) and industry research positions!

👋I am a Postdoc Fellow at @hcii.cmu.edu working at the intersection of human-AI interaction, cognitive science, responsible AI, design, and social computing. I earned my PhD from @gtresearch.bsky.social in 2024.

Love to see this. I set up a recurring monthly donation to my food bank.
Donated in memory of my immigrant grandmothers and their foundational belief that food == love
I just donated to my local food bank. If you can, you should too. People are already suffering but next month, in particular, is going to be so difficult.

Reposted by Daniel Zappala

Donated in memory of my immigrant grandmothers and their foundational belief that food == love
I just donated to my local food bank. If you can, you should too. People are already suffering but next month, in particular, is going to be so difficult.
Life situations are bleak right now for a lot of people. In tech, the "Venn Diagram" of (1) positive work and (2) making enough money to support your family is increasingly non-overlapping. We all do what we can.
This image has been living in my mind rent-free for months.

Coded with an LLM

(this works for both systems and qualitative researchers)
In honor of spooky month, share a 4 word horror story that only someone in your profession would understand

I'll go first: Six page commercial lease.
In honor of spooky month, share a 4 word horror story that only someone in your profession would understand

I'll go first: Six page commercial lease.

I was up there this summer and it was gorgeous. Utah is pretty good right now too.

Curious how you secure your e-bike while running errands

This paper measured propaganda accounts and was at USENIX Security. Much more of a quantitative approach. But I get 💕 for a good qualitative paper.

www.usenix.org/conference/u...
Characterizing and Detecting Propaganda-Spreading Accounts on Telegram | USENIX
www.usenix.org

You see significant overlap and PCs in human-centered security among the above and SOUPS. For CHI, the security and privacy subcommittee in particular.

Since it’s participatory maybe CSCW but I’m less familiar with it.

You could make an argument that propaganda campaigns fit under the security umbrella. And USENIX Security has a good set of reviewers that understand and accept qualitative work. Same with IEEE S&P. CCS is a work in progress.

Alternatively maybe CHI, but the registration deadline just passed.

Reposted by Daniel Zappala

It will be my second year co-chairing the Privacy and Security subcommittee at #CHI2026, with the awesome Florian Schaub and Emilee Rader. Abstract submission is today, and we are very excited to review the list of papers that you'll send our way...
Reminder🔉 Abstract/metadata deadline is today (Sep 4 AoE)! No new submissions and author changes after the deadline. Make sure metadata is finalized before time runs out!

Reposted by Daniel Zappala

I have thoughts. Firstly, Bunch is absolutely right about this. I say this as someone who has worked for corporate media and small media. This is spot on:

Reposted by Daniel Zappala

HD Moore @hdm.io · Aug 10
Thank you to everyone who made it out for my DEF CON 33 presentation, "Shaking Out Shells With SSHamble", you can find the materials online at hdm.io/decks/MOORE%...

This deck includes some lightly-censored zero-day (more decks @ hdm.io)

Why is it a useful learning activity for a student to correct an AI system? Isn’t this more valuable for those training the AI than for the student? This seems to complicate learning more than to improve it.
"For example, a student could be asked to compare an AI-generated summary of an academic article with the original text, assessing what the AI engine gets right, what it gets wrong, and whether the article’s most important contributions have been recognized." (see next post)

Reposted by Daniel Zappala

"For example, a student could be asked to compare an AI-generated summary of an academic article with the original text, assessing what the AI engine gets right, what it gets wrong, and whether the article’s most important contributions have been recognized." (see next post)

Reposted by Daniel Zappala

Look at what happens to male teacher salaries (blue line) v.s. female teacher salaries (red line) after collective bargaining laws expire.

Reposted by Daniel Zappala

I'm in a phenomenal talk on gender inequality in cybersecurity this morrning and this is such a great cheat sheet for intersectional fair employment.

Oh that’s an interesting form of quality control. Are you using a local instance? I would worry that, even if the venue doesn’t prohibit its use, I would be feeding training data to the LLM without the authors’ consent.

Can you share how you use an LLM to help you with your reviews? Maybe you can convince me that I should try.

Reposted by Daniel Zappala

Opinion: Gutting humanities signals the end of innovation in business and STEM
As a college professor, watching the dismantling of America’s education system has been among the most discouraging events of my life. American aspirations to be a leader in the world of business and science — which springs from our country’s support only of STEM fields — portend their own loss as things like humanities classes are being threatened with extinction. The things that provide powerful support for the structural modes of thought that promote ideas and innovation are being swept away. And make no mistake, humanities is as important to innovation as science. As an exercise with my Honors students, I ask them to imagine that a group of space aliens arrive and tell them they can have science or humanities but not both (or they will destroy both). Which would they keep? Most people think about the things that have made their lives healthier or allowed them to enjoy the marvels of modern engineering or computation. Interestingly, humanities came first in human history. It was from the humanities that science was developed. The arts were here long before science and are what made science possible. They are the very ground of business and STEM fields. You can make science out of the humanities, but the reverse is unlikely. It’s because we had to have the imagination to build, the capacity to envision new worlds, before we could create something as innovative as science — especially as it was developed in the 17th century. To imagine, dream, think critically and use our minds’ eyes to conceive of futures differently than we were handed are necessary for conjuring new worlds. I often surprise my students when I tell them there is more truth in fiction than in science. I’m being a little tongue-in-cheek, but I do believe it. Science cannot teach us values. They are derived from insights that we learn to understand from the great art, music and literature of the past. The exercise of the imagination is one of the most crucial skills for bringing novelty, invention and new ideas into the world. Reading great literature and listening to world music, poetry, art and other humanities have been vital to my life. The arts humankind has produced have taught me much about how to live more fully and think more critically, caringly and empathically. These skills taught me to think more deeply about the things I taught as a scientist and mathematician. Yes, I teach STEM subjects. My education includes a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science and Statistics from Brigham Young University, a master’s degree in biostatistics from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a Ph.D. in biomathematics. I teach and do research in the biology department at BYU. But without my humanities leanings and studies, I would not have been a very good scientist. My humanities classes were a master class in creativity, envisioning new futures and how to think. It was the skills we learned in our humanities classes that bring creativity to all our endeavors. It is foolish to think that we can make progress in any field without the depth of imagination provided by our humanities classes. Yet that is the supposition that is spreading across our nation like a plague. And it is wrong. Literature classes are essential for science. Music for business. Art for engineering. Poetry for values. If you want STEM-only thinking for our businesses and sciences, then get ready to hire AI algorithms or robots. They can handle that aspect quite well. However, as of yet, only humans can think imaginatively. We can dream. We can recognize and embrace values. The world you see unfolding in this destruction of the humanities is nothing less than abandoning innovation, creativity and a better future. Lose the humanities, and you lose the very ground of science and business that depend on it. Destroy those, and you lose the creative future for which we all hope. Opinion: Let’s be thoughtful in our approach to higher education in Utah
www.deseret.com