Sir Gobbersworth
banner
sirgobbersworth.bsky.social
Sir Gobbersworth
@sirgobbersworth.bsky.social
Senior QA Analyst in the gaming industry. He/him.
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
once again I'm begging and pleading with someone in the press to draw this obvious connection between trump/epstein and trump's precision defunding of programs that assist women who are the victims of domestic and sexual abuse
November 13, 2025 at 5:53 PM
No, I actually think the emails themselves are pretty newsworthy for their contents too and I find it *really* fucking weird that you apparently don't.
The emails that you’re seeing now are news in themselves, but that’s because of how they’re coming out—a congressional committee released them—& the context in which they’re being viewed. A guy emailing a reporter talking about old girlfriends or saying someone is “dirty” is not a whole news story.
November 13, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
a lot of people regretting the 'this shoulda been an email' advice rn lol
November 13, 2025 at 3:57 AM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
Well, it's a little clearer now why billionaires are so invested in technology that produces better written emails.
November 12, 2025 at 10:23 PM
Honestly that second part might be *too* opaque for how these dipshits talked
Pizzagate: If you replace the word “hot dog” with “little boy” and “pizza party” with “child sex orgy,” you will see the lengths these elites go to cover up their crimes.

Real elite emails: Send me nude pictures of those 8th graders we abused last weekend post-haste! I am the Ambassador to Turkey.
November 13, 2025 at 7:44 AM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
Anyway, though all this seems bad for Trump, I think we have to consider the gains he will make in the modern Libertarian Party
November 13, 2025 at 2:34 AM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
jeffrey epstein spent thanksgiving *2017* with President Donald Trump at Mar a Lago and we only know this now i'm going to go insane
November 13, 2025 at 2:57 AM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
I would be utterly thrilled to rid the Democratic Party of everyone who was pals with Jeffrey fucking Epstein

why exactly would I want a child abuser to make government policy
"This could take down Democrats, too."

I know. And I frankly wouldn't give even an itty bitty damn if it implicated every Democratic man in Congress, every Democratic hopeful for 2028 and every Democrat who has even thought about running for office.

Down with the sex predators, wherever they are.
November 13, 2025 at 1:32 AM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
Again, maybe what the takeaway we should have from political reporter after political reporter not just getting chummy w ppl like Trump or Epstein (or RFK Jr 👀) but actively running interference for them—either in their coverage or privately—is that its an industry full of ppl that are Bad Actually™️
Fall 2017: Then-NYT reporter literally warning Epstein that someone is "digging around again."
November 12, 2025 at 10:18 PM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
They gaslit you about Russiagate and they hid Trump’s relationship with Epstein from you.
The Kremlin disguised a nearly $100 mn payment to Trump in the form of a brokered real estate deal... and both Jeffrey Epstein and William Pulte were involved in the deal. That's very interesting.
November 12, 2025 at 11:27 PM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
To be clear, even if I thought there was absolutely zero chance the files come out, forcing the issue is useful: Americans deserve to know which of their politicians are actively running cover for *the trafficking and rape of children.*
November 12, 2025 at 9:59 PM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
November 12, 2025 at 7:32 PM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
This headline is journalistic malpractice. This isn't Epstein "alleging" that Trump knew. This is Epstein and Maxwell discussing - in 2011, long before Trump had political salience - how the FACT that Trump knew might play out

Both of them took as a given that this was a fact in a private email
November 12, 2025 at 2:08 PM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
This sounds reasonable but is 100% wrong. Whether you or agree or disagree with a study is completely immaterial. What matters is whether the study was conducted properly and generates valid results. And it's impolitic to say but it's true: you have to have some level of expertise to judge that.
JD Vance: "Science as practiced in its best form is that if you disagree with it, then you ought to criticize it and you ought to argue against it."
November 12, 2025 at 5:57 PM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
Yeah, I'm going to agree with Akiva and others here - I think setting rules that are based on a failure to understand that learning is individual, and different students learn in different ways is poor pedagogy at best, and a failure to accommodate legitimate needs at worst.
Two things: (1) students who take transcripts don't usually wind up *thinking* during class; they're trying to get every word down. If they actually listen carefully, then can jot down a phrase or two, and that will be enough to remind them of more of what was being said. And ...
November 12, 2025 at 5:41 PM
November 12, 2025 at 1:42 AM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
I don't like to compare the two (what's happening in Gaza and Sudan are both atrocities, and it's easy for folks to make a comparison seem like a competition, especially online) but these numbers are beyond horrific.
“We're seeing a level of proliferation of bodies & body piles from space that's unlike anything I've ever seen…”

Human rights investigator Nathaniel Raymond explains how more people could be killed within a week in Sudan, compared to the past two years in Gaza.

🔗 zeteo.com/p/sudans-dea...
November 9, 2025 at 9:59 PM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
There are certain fights that you need to either never pick in the first place or be certain you're willing to see all the way through.

The shutdown was one of them.
November 12, 2025 at 12:22 AM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
Ppl need to understand what's happening here.

The GOP response to the shutdown was: You're gonna cave, or we're going to hurt vulnerable people by shutting off SNAP. The Dems, unwilling to let that happen, caved.

Having watched that, the GOP is now saying: "Give us what we want on abortion or ..."
November 12, 2025 at 12:19 AM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
i'd give 3:1 odds on the trump administration just straight-up using tariff revenues as a slush fund to pay for things outside the appropriations process
November 11, 2025 at 8:12 PM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
Listen, I'm not saying I endorse brutal mockery of Avi Loeb's claims that every interstellar comet we see is an alien spaceship, but I will link to it because the aliens made me in order to sow doubt about their cometships.

oddnews.com/article/this...
“This Comet Thing Is Aliens,” Says Resident Harvard Fraud Avi Loeb
Like he does every week, without evidence.
oddnews.com
November 11, 2025 at 7:42 PM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
November 11, 2025 at 2:56 AM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
The thing about the "I voted against this" position Schumer is taking is that either he is trying to mislead Dem voters by implying he didn't support reopening right now, or he has no control over his caucus.
November 10, 2025 at 9:35 PM
Reposted by Sir Gobbersworth
ok well i gotta give him this one
November 10, 2025 at 5:52 PM
Absolutely pathetic, goodness
weirdly honest messaging from the breakaway mod/institutionalist leaders who blew up the party strategy

they're explicitly giving up. "It wasn't working so we quit" that's the message
November 10, 2025 at 3:08 PM