This is a distinguishing characteristic in this case from most uses —>
they have the gall to suggest to authors they've opted-in that they volunteer to evaluate the LLMs' suggestions regarding their own work.
lol, lmao even. here is the invite and my reply
This is a distinguishing characteristic in this case from most uses —>
I don't have a political strategy lecture about that. It's just viscerally disgusting.
I don't have a political strategy lecture about that. It's just viscerally disgusting.
Let’s turn to the Glorious Revolution:
Revenues “of Prerogative without Grant of Parlyament for longer time or in other manner then the same is or shall be granted is Illegall.” 1 W. & M., 2d sess., c.2 (1688/9).
Let’s turn to the Glorious Revolution:
Revenues “of Prerogative without Grant of Parlyament for longer time or in other manner then the same is or shall be granted is Illegall.” 1 W. & M., 2d sess., c.2 (1688/9).
Nope. Love is a manifold.
Nope. Love is a manifold.
I stand by my review here. Through ten episodes it was an all-time great show. Its failure, in the end, was feeling like it needed to artificially up the stakes... Still a good show. But no longer a great show. The exceptional was unnecessary.
But my biggest frustration with the show was the need to have DRAMA in what was already an incredibly intense and dramatic retelling of what could have been any old Tuesday in the ER.
You know what I want out of a second season? I don’t want the unforgettable day. I want the completely forgettable day.
Shows like that suffer from thinking that the only place where there’s drama is in the exceptional.
I stand by my review here. Through ten episodes it was an all-time great show. Its failure, in the end, was feeling like it needed to artificially up the stakes... Still a good show. But no longer a great show. The exceptional was unnecessary.
Monstrously cruel.
Wrote this two years ago: “If the insurrectionist-in-chief returns to power without ever facing any real consequences and while explicitly declaring his intent to establish a vindictive autocracy, then January 6 will have been successful.”
And here we are.
Wrote this two years ago: “If the insurrectionist-in-chief returns to power without ever facing any real consequences and while explicitly declaring his intent to establish a vindictive autocracy, then January 6 will have been successful.”
And here we are.
This shot is from my first time out birding after that.
Living like this is a deliberate choice.
This shot is from my first time out birding after that.
Living like this is a deliberate choice.
https://www.29news.com/2026/01/05/class-action-lawsuit-claims-mcdonalds-mcrib-doesnt-actually-contain-rib-meat/
Sure, I get that there's an element of LINE GO UP; EVERYONE GET RICH that is propelling the thing (especially among retail folks). But there are fundamentals someplace, right? RIGHT? And this level of instability...
Sure, I get that there's an element of LINE GO UP; EVERYONE GET RICH that is propelling the thing (especially among retail folks). But there are fundamentals someplace, right? RIGHT? And this level of instability...