She has engaged in repeated, profound ethical violations that she has been rewarded for by her colleagues in the press. It's not slut-shaming to observe this
Everyone in my feed is shitting on Nuzzi. Meanwhile, the other person in the saga is now destroying the medical community and endangering public health.
Scoop: Olivia Nuzzi has written a book during her year in exile, in which she is set to in part address her relationship with RFK Jr. Details in @status.news: www.status.news/p/olivia-nuz...
November 18, 2025 at 1:44 PM
She has engaged in repeated, profound ethical violations that she has been rewarded for by her colleagues in the press. It's not slut-shaming to observe this
“Ronaldo’s visit comes nearly a decade after reports emerged that he’d been accused of a 2009 sexual assault of a Las Vegas model and teacher. He has denied the allegations and has never been criminally charged.” dlvr.it/TPKybg
The thing about Hunter's benders is that he didn't want to invite elites to them because he was, on some level, ashamed of his own behavior in a way none of the elites ever were.
November 18, 2025 at 2:07 AM
I hate that “I wish the head of the New York Times had the same self-awareness as a crackhead failson” is a factually true sentence.
My cats are little princes who have servants take care of their meals and take care of their literal shit, they spend all day lazing around as freeloaders, and the only price is that they only get to go outside if accompanied by one of their servants
November 17, 2025 at 10:32 PM
My cats are little princes who have servants take care of their meals and take care of their literal shit, they spend all day lazing around as freeloaders, and the only price is that they only get to go outside if accompanied by one of their servants
At some point, incompetence and deliberate indifference to the law reaches a point where it is indistinguishable from deliberate misconduct. This is why you don’t hand a complex matter to someone who has never presented to a grand jury before.
A federal judge ORDERS the disclosure of James Comey's grand jury minutes to the defense, citing a "disturbing pattern pattern of profound investigative missteps" and casting doubt on Lindsey Halligan's declaration about the gap in the record.
At some point, incompetence and deliberate indifference to the law reaches a point where it is indistinguishable from deliberate misconduct. This is why you don’t hand a complex matter to someone who has never presented to a grand jury before.
"Powered by OpenAI’s GPT-4o model by default...tests repeatedly showed that the AI toy dropped its guardrails the longer a conversation went on, until hitting rock bottom on incredibly disturbing topics."
So in the Comey case, the only grand jury witness was an FBI agent who had reviewed privileged materials (and was thus, as we say, "tainted"), and then Halligan made two separate grossly inappropriate statements about the law to the grand jury?
Preposterously corrupt and incompetent all at once.
👀Fitzpatrick said Halligan made two apparent "fundamental misstatements of law" to the grand jury that could threaten the case. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
November 17, 2025 at 5:38 PM
So in the Comey case, the only grand jury witness was an FBI agent who had reviewed privileged materials (and was thus, as we say, "tainted"), and then Halligan made two separate grossly inappropriate statements about the law to the grand jury?
Preposterously corrupt and incompetent all at once.
Don’t think it’s especially likely. But if Republicans spend the next year in this kind of chaos, then lose midterms by a big margin, they might be less interested in election subversion than in tying a future Dem president’s hands—a playbook perfected by state-level GOP enemies of democracy.
Don’t think it’s especially likely. But if Republicans spend the next year in this kind of chaos, then lose midterms by a big margin, they might be less interested in election subversion than in tying a future Dem president’s hands—a playbook perfected by state-level GOP enemies of democracy.
More good coverage on crypto fraud in the NYT this morning. Note the phrase "at least $28 billion". It is undoubtedly A LOT more than $28 billion because the technology is so perfectly designed to be untraceable AND this doesn't include all kinds of fraud. www.nytimes.com/2025/11/17/t...
More good coverage on crypto fraud in the NYT this morning. Note the phrase "at least $28 billion". It is undoubtedly A LOT more than $28 billion because the technology is so perfectly designed to be untraceable AND this doesn't include all kinds of fraud. www.nytimes.com/2025/11/17/t...
Thinking about how Summers and Epstein both frequently manipulated the media into giving or withholding coverage when they wanted and how the same media mysteriously decided to wage a scorched earth jihad against Harvard's President Claudine Gay. It's a strange coincidence to ponder!
A senior academic using mentoring as leverage to obtain sex is a contemptible abuser of power.
November 17, 2025 at 2:44 PM
Thinking about how Summers and Epstein both frequently manipulated the media into giving or withholding coverage when they wanted and how the same media mysteriously decided to wage a scorched earth jihad against Harvard's President Claudine Gay. It's a strange coincidence to ponder!
guy lied to both his donors and voters about what he actually intended to do and probably handed the election to bush in the process and has spent the last quarter century being an absolutely impenetrable shithead about it, providing a permission structure for lolnothingmatters low-info dickheads
November 17, 2025 at 5:34 AM
you do not hate or blame ralph nader enough for the last quarter century of dysfunction
relatedly, ralph nader deserves to be remembered for the rest of time as someone who voluntarily assisted in a critical attack on american democracy, the importance of which far outweighs any of his consumer advocacy
i don't think that bush v. gore is the *worst* ruling in the history of the supreme court, but i do think it is the most openly *corrupt* ruling in its history. a real disgrace.
November 17, 2025 at 4:35 AM
relatedly, ralph nader deserves to be remembered for the rest of time as someone who voluntarily assisted in a critical attack on american democracy, the importance of which far outweighs any of his consumer advocacy