@windfola.bsky.social
Going on hiatus! Take care you all it's a scary world out there.
Pinned
Modern day translator 🇬🇧
Gender critical = transphobe
Race critical = racist
Islam critical = Muslim hater
Free speech = right to abuse
Dignity and respect = shut up when we dehumanize you
Cancel culture = social consequences
Gender critical = transphobe
Race critical = racist
Islam critical = Muslim hater
Free speech = right to abuse
Dignity and respect = shut up when we dehumanize you
Cancel culture = social consequences
Reposted
What. The. Fuck.
23/ Cross turns to human rights. He says there is no authority for the proposition that it will be a breach of a trans persons’ human rights not to permit them to use a toilet.
November 13, 2025 at 10:21 PM
What. The. Fuck.
Reposted
Has he admitted the EA, according to the SC, was written to end the rights afforded by Croft, Goodwin, GRA etc. meaning ministers had knowingly and deliberately misled the European Council at the time of royal ascent?
November 13, 2025 at 10:33 PM
Has he admitted the EA, according to the SC, was written to end the rights afforded by Croft, Goodwin, GRA etc. meaning ministers had knowingly and deliberately misled the European Council at the time of royal ascent?
Reposted
The right of trans people to use toilets, vs the rights of cis people not to be uncomfortable, got it
November 13, 2025 at 9:47 PM
The right of trans people to use toilets, vs the rights of cis people not to be uncomfortable, got it
Reposted
What the Supreme Court have clearly failed to grasp is that the purpose of the Gender Reassignment Regulations 1999, Goodwin v UK in 2002, the Gender Recognition Act 2004 and the Equality Act 2010 provisions was to integrate trans people in society, with a small number of exceptions where necessary.
November 9, 2025 at 10:03 AM
What the Supreme Court have clearly failed to grasp is that the purpose of the Gender Reassignment Regulations 1999, Goodwin v UK in 2002, the Gender Recognition Act 2004 and the Equality Act 2010 provisions was to integrate trans people in society, with a small number of exceptions where necessary.
Reposted
Ummm…
23/ Cross turns to human rights. He says there is no authority for the proposition that it will be a breach of a trans persons’ human rights not to permit them to use a toilet.
November 13, 2025 at 9:43 PM
Ummm…
Reposted
I'm sorry. What. Did I read that right?
He... said that? He said... THAT!?
He... said that? He said... THAT!?
November 13, 2025 at 9:40 PM
I'm sorry. What. Did I read that right?
He... said that? He said... THAT!?
He... said that? He said... THAT!?
Reposted
It’s a biological fact™ that trans people don’t need to pee. It’s just basic bolology.
November 13, 2025 at 9:46 PM
It’s a biological fact™ that trans people don’t need to pee. It’s just basic bolology.
Reposted
Yeah. It's just a stupid, stupid, fundamentally unworkable standard, and even aside from the wretched immorality of it, it is going to have *so many* edge cases that make a mockery of the whole thing but destroy people's lives.
November 13, 2025 at 7:40 PM
Yeah. It's just a stupid, stupid, fundamentally unworkable standard, and even aside from the wretched immorality of it, it is going to have *so many* edge cases that make a mockery of the whole thing but destroy people's lives.
Reposted
One of Epstein's victims was a trans teen, but nobody paid attention because she was trans & Latina. The Post + Times of Israel even ran hit pieces on her!
Epstein's lawyer claimed he wasn't gay, so Ava must have lied. He could've been stopped sooner if society listened to POC, trans folks or girls
Epstein's lawyer claimed he wasn't gay, so Ava must have lied. He could've been stopped sooner if society listened to POC, trans folks or girls
November 13, 2025 at 6:39 PM
One of Epstein's victims was a trans teen, but nobody paid attention because she was trans & Latina. The Post + Times of Israel even ran hit pieces on her!
Epstein's lawyer claimed he wasn't gay, so Ava must have lied. He could've been stopped sooner if society listened to POC, trans folks or girls
Epstein's lawyer claimed he wasn't gay, so Ava must have lied. He could've been stopped sooner if society listened to POC, trans folks or girls
Reposted
Here, Cross used the words dignity and privacy because they reflect article 8 rights. But I think “dignity and privacy for cis folks but not trans folks” is a perfect article 14 violation. 🙂
22/ Cross says the legitimate aim would be to pursue the purpose underlying the 1992 Regulations, namely dignity and privacy.
Avoiding inconsistent legislative requirements and maintaining the ability to comply with them are also legitimate aims.
Avoiding inconsistent legislative requirements and maintaining the ability to comply with them are also legitimate aims.
November 13, 2025 at 7:37 PM
Here, Cross used the words dignity and privacy because they reflect article 8 rights. But I think “dignity and privacy for cis folks but not trans folks” is a perfect article 14 violation. 🙂
Reposted
Notice it's moved on from just trans people to ALL lgbt people!
“A stall was run by staff members wearing police T-shirts with Pride motifs and Progress lanyards” – James Gardner of Conrathe Gardner LLP
www.attitude.co.uk/news/wiltshi...
www.attitude.co.uk/news/wiltshi...
Wiltshire Police accused of 'LGBTQ+ bias' as force is sued by free speech campaigners over Pride stall
Fair Cop's Sarah Phillimore says the force’s involvement showed a “lack of neutrality” and could be seen as supporting LGBTQ+ causes.
www.attitude.co.uk
November 13, 2025 at 7:08 AM
Notice it's moved on from just trans people to ALL lgbt people!
Reposted
Nah.
No matter how bad it gets cis ppl will still just sit there & watch it happen.
Just five years ago where we are right now was unthinkable. And where are the cis? They're complaining the BBC doesn't hate us enough.
No matter how bad it gets cis ppl will still just sit there & watch it happen.
Just five years ago where we are right now was unthinkable. And where are the cis? They're complaining the BBC doesn't hate us enough.
November 13, 2025 at 3:09 PM
Nah.
No matter how bad it gets cis ppl will still just sit there & watch it happen.
Just five years ago where we are right now was unthinkable. And where are the cis? They're complaining the BBC doesn't hate us enough.
No matter how bad it gets cis ppl will still just sit there & watch it happen.
Just five years ago where we are right now was unthinkable. And where are the cis? They're complaining the BBC doesn't hate us enough.
Reposted
Yeah this feels like the strategy to me too. And that’s been the strategy all along. Push for the most extreme thing possible and pray you get the right judge.
Exactly what happens in the US with their attacks on human rights.
Exactly what happens in the US with their attacks on human rights.
November 13, 2025 at 1:51 PM
Yeah this feels like the strategy to me too. And that’s been the strategy all along. Push for the most extreme thing possible and pray you get the right judge.
Exactly what happens in the US with their attacks on human rights.
Exactly what happens in the US with their attacks on human rights.
Reposted
“the Commission is sceptical that Convention rights provide a useful framework, or tool, by which the Court may resolve the contentious issues in this case.”
The HRA and ECHR have been the framework for all our law since 1998!
You can’t just turn around and say “it doesn’t apply in this case.”
The HRA and ECHR have been the framework for all our law since 1998!
You can’t just turn around and say “it doesn’t apply in this case.”
Probably worth noting here that in the Supreme Court submission, the EHRC decided not to bother taking the Human Rights Act into account 🤯
www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/defaul...
www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/defaul...
![(4) The Human Rights Act 1998
47. The Commission’s proposed interpretation of the various relevant provisions of the EqA is advanced without reference to the Human Rights Act 1998 (“HRA”). That is for three reasons. First, even assuming that it were applicable, it is not necessary to resort to the principle of interpretation in s. 3 HRA, in order to justify the conclusion that the second definition is the one adopted in the EqA. Second, in areas of difficulty of interpretation, notably ss. 17 and 18 EqA, even assuming that it were applicable, s. 3 HRA would not compel the unsatisfactory conclusion that “woman” should have different meanings across the EqA. Third, and in any event, the Commission is sceptical that Convention rights provide a useful framework, or tool, by which the Court may resolve the contentious issues in this case. There are, after all, two competing strands of rights at issue: the rights of trans people, as recognised, for example, in Goodwin; and the rights of women to be protected from violence by men (eg Luca v Moldova (2024) 79 EHRR 2, §50) and from having to share certain spaces with trans women and men, thereby creating embarrassment, shame and potentially an increased risk of violence (see FDJ v Secretary of State for Justice [2021] EWHC 1746 (Admin), [2021] 1 WLR 5265, §§76-78, 98 and 100 [EF.1196]). It is for Parliament to decide, against the background of the HRA, how these competing strands of rights should be reconciled.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:cusxj5mn22tulo2annoirqwx/bafkreihzxa6xpk6pbz3ehifwg7fkctbbdlvtjjy6m74v7uzcllhb4srcli@jpeg)
November 13, 2025 at 6:37 AM
“the Commission is sceptical that Convention rights provide a useful framework, or tool, by which the Court may resolve the contentious issues in this case.”
The HRA and ECHR have been the framework for all our law since 1998!
You can’t just turn around and say “it doesn’t apply in this case.”
The HRA and ECHR have been the framework for all our law since 1998!
You can’t just turn around and say “it doesn’t apply in this case.”
Reposted
If the Prescott memo is true, and there is a secret cabal of LGBTQ+ journalists stopping any negative stories about trans people being published or aired at BBC News, then, I have to say, they’re doing a really fucking shit job of that.
November 12, 2025 at 10:41 AM
If the Prescott memo is true, and there is a secret cabal of LGBTQ+ journalists stopping any negative stories about trans people being published or aired at BBC News, then, I have to say, they’re doing a really fucking shit job of that.
Reposted
As all this disgusting Epstein shit starts surfacing more and more, I hope we don't lose sight of the fact that apparently every major media outlet knew everything and instead spent their time money and energy attacking the trans community.
November 13, 2025 at 1:07 AM
As all this disgusting Epstein shit starts surfacing more and more, I hope we don't lose sight of the fact that apparently every major media outlet knew everything and instead spent their time money and energy attacking the trans community.
Reposted
Everyday he just proves Dawn Foster had his number
November 13, 2025 at 12:19 PM
Everyday he just proves Dawn Foster had his number
Reposted
Reposted
Or the same Wes Streeting who's senior aide exposed himself to a 13 year old girl? He really needs to watch who he associates with. www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
Wes Streeting ex-aide Sam Gould sentenced over indecent exposures
A Labour councillor was handed a suspended sentence after exposing himself to a girl and a woman.
www.bbc.co.uk
November 13, 2025 at 12:18 PM
Or the same Wes Streeting who's senior aide exposed himself to a 13 year old girl? He really needs to watch who he associates with. www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
Reposted
Honestly, if you appreciate me and the work I have done, and continue to do. And if you want to get me a birthday present - support Good Law Project's work 🎁👇
goodlawproject.org/donate/?utm_...
goodlawproject.org/donate/?utm_...
November 13, 2025 at 11:54 AM
Honestly, if you appreciate me and the work I have done, and continue to do. And if you want to get me a birthday present - support Good Law Project's work 🎁👇
goodlawproject.org/donate/?utm_...
goodlawproject.org/donate/?utm_...
Reposted
(Tho i will absolutely pose that Brianna would not be behind this project and be appalled at being deadnamed in the press and even have Rosie Duffield show up smiling in front of her name but hey what do i know i only was a 16 year old trans girl just 11 years ago)
November 13, 2025 at 11:11 AM
(Tho i will absolutely pose that Brianna would not be behind this project and be appalled at being deadnamed in the press and even have Rosie Duffield show up smiling in front of her name but hey what do i know i only was a 16 year old trans girl just 11 years ago)
Reposted
Genuinely think all those MPs are blindsided when hordes of trans people come out to yell at them for ghoulishly using a transphobic murder to ban phones and ignore the transphobia. They dont even consider that a cis woman couldnt know whats best for her trans daughter
November 13, 2025 at 11:09 AM
Genuinely think all those MPs are blindsided when hordes of trans people come out to yell at them for ghoulishly using a transphobic murder to ban phones and ignore the transphobia. They dont even consider that a cis woman couldnt know whats best for her trans daughter
Reposted
Yknow thinking more about MPs championing the no phones in schools thing in Brianna Ghey’s name just how arrogant you gotta be as a cis person not to wonder where all the trans people endorsing your project are at named after a girl murdered for being trans
November 13, 2025 at 11:07 AM
Yknow thinking more about MPs championing the no phones in schools thing in Brianna Ghey’s name just how arrogant you gotta be as a cis person not to wonder where all the trans people endorsing your project are at named after a girl murdered for being trans
Reposted
Maybe its not insulting to Brianna’s memory, who knows i never met her, maybe this very online trans girl actually wished all phones were banned. But this whole project sure as fuck is insulting to the traumatic event of a transphobic murder that holds great significance to a whole community
November 13, 2025 at 11:10 AM
Maybe its not insulting to Brianna’s memory, who knows i never met her, maybe this very online trans girl actually wished all phones were banned. But this whole project sure as fuck is insulting to the traumatic event of a transphobic murder that holds great significance to a whole community
Reposted
Ultimately this whole thing again has the establishment deferring to a cis woman as knowing whats best for trans people and scolding us trannies for daring to disagree
Yknow thinking more about MPs championing the no phones in schools thing in Brianna Ghey’s name just how arrogant you gotta be as a cis person not to wonder where all the trans people endorsing your project are at named after a girl murdered for being trans
November 13, 2025 at 11:13 AM
Ultimately this whole thing again has the establishment deferring to a cis woman as knowing whats best for trans people and scolding us trannies for daring to disagree