Sandra
@lillelaps.bsky.social
I'm trans, I like cartoons and spooky stuff and video games and spicy instant noodles. Might share NSFW art sometimes. She/her
Pinned
Sandra
@lillelaps.bsky.social
· Jan 27
Here's my rules on my bsky:
Don't be T.R.A.S.H.
Transphobic
Racist
Ableist
Sexist
Homophobic
if you are, fuck off.
Don't be T.R.A.S.H.
Transphobic
Racist
Ableist
Sexist
Homophobic
if you are, fuck off.
Reposted by Sandra
How can anybody write “they are changing to a different gender identity” and then claim that this is somehow not gender reassignment? What fucking mental gymnastics are they practising?
November 29, 2025 at 11:21 AM
How can anybody write “they are changing to a different gender identity” and then claim that this is somehow not gender reassignment? What fucking mental gymnastics are they practising?
Reposted by Sandra
This makes for absolute fucking wild reading.
"Yes, we acknowledge that the claimant has changed their name and pronouns for the purposes of moving away from being female, but we don't think that means it's for the purpose of reassigning sex. Case closed!"
"Yes, we acknowledge that the claimant has changed their name and pronouns for the purposes of moving away from being female, but we don't think that means it's for the purpose of reassigning sex. Case closed!"
November 29, 2025 at 11:07 AM
This makes for absolute fucking wild reading.
"Yes, we acknowledge that the claimant has changed their name and pronouns for the purposes of moving away from being female, but we don't think that means it's for the purpose of reassigning sex. Case closed!"
"Yes, we acknowledge that the claimant has changed their name and pronouns for the purposes of moving away from being female, but we don't think that means it's for the purpose of reassigning sex. Case closed!"
Reposted by Sandra
At this point I just hope Yorp fades into obscurity without doing any more damage.
I guess it's a useful case study for future leftist movements. A timeline that shows exactly why we should never organise with bigots, no matter how loudly they proclaim to be 'socialists'.
I guess it's a useful case study for future leftist movements. A timeline that shows exactly why we should never organise with bigots, no matter how loudly they proclaim to be 'socialists'.
November 29, 2025 at 7:32 PM
At this point I just hope Yorp fades into obscurity without doing any more damage.
I guess it's a useful case study for future leftist movements. A timeline that shows exactly why we should never organise with bigots, no matter how loudly they proclaim to be 'socialists'.
I guess it's a useful case study for future leftist movements. A timeline that shows exactly why we should never organise with bigots, no matter how loudly they proclaim to be 'socialists'.
Reposted by Sandra
smug ass 'your party' advocates have spent a couple months now brushing off our concerns of transphobia while condescendingly saying 'get involved! have a say at the conference!'.
most of us knew better but this is what's happened to someone who actually took that advice and tried to participate.
most of us knew better but this is what's happened to someone who actually took that advice and tried to participate.
Yorp conference doing its best to shut down anyone daring to call a transphobe a transphobe.
November 29, 2025 at 7:08 PM
smug ass 'your party' advocates have spent a couple months now brushing off our concerns of transphobia while condescendingly saying 'get involved! have a say at the conference!'.
most of us knew better but this is what's happened to someone who actually took that advice and tried to participate.
most of us knew better but this is what's happened to someone who actually took that advice and tried to participate.
Reposted by Sandra
when people are transphobic your party says nothing
when someone points out that transphobia your party says "hey cmon now, leave it out"
when someone points out that transphobia your party says "hey cmon now, leave it out"
Yorp conference doing its best to shut down anyone daring to call a transphobe a transphobe.
November 29, 2025 at 2:42 PM
when people are transphobic your party says nothing
when someone points out that transphobia your party says "hey cmon now, leave it out"
when someone points out that transphobia your party says "hey cmon now, leave it out"
Reposted by Sandra
Your Party members for the past few months: "Maybe wait until our conference in November before you start calling us transphobic?"
Your Party conference in November: tells trans woman not to call transphobes "transphobic"
Your Party conference in November: tells trans woman not to call transphobes "transphobic"
Yorp conference doing its best to shut down anyone daring to call a transphobe a transphobe.
November 29, 2025 at 2:14 PM
Your Party members for the past few months: "Maybe wait until our conference in November before you start calling us transphobic?"
Your Party conference in November: tells trans woman not to call transphobes "transphobic"
Your Party conference in November: tells trans woman not to call transphobes "transphobic"
Reposted by Sandra
Thing is, we DID hear about it at his confirmation hearing.
Every single senator who voted to confirm Hegseth knew he held these views about the laws of war.
They voted to confirm him anyway.
Every single senator who voted to confirm Hegseth knew he held these views about the laws of war.
They voted to confirm him anyway.
Everyone should read this terrifying thread about Hegseth’s published views wrt war crimes. It’s pretty fucking radical …. We needed to hear about this in his confirmation hearing.
A chapter in Hegseth’s book is literally titled “More Lethality, Less Lawyers.”
It’s almost as if there were signs!
It’s almost as if there were signs!
November 29, 2025 at 6:01 PM
Thing is, we DID hear about it at his confirmation hearing.
Every single senator who voted to confirm Hegseth knew he held these views about the laws of war.
They voted to confirm him anyway.
Every single senator who voted to confirm Hegseth knew he held these views about the laws of war.
They voted to confirm him anyway.
Reposted by Sandra
At least they can read this back to him at The Hague.
November 29, 2025 at 3:26 AM
At least they can read this back to him at The Hague.
Reposted by Sandra
Everyone should read this terrifying thread about Hegseth’s published views wrt war crimes. It’s pretty fucking radical …. We needed to hear about this in his confirmation hearing.
A chapter in Hegseth’s book is literally titled “More Lethality, Less Lawyers.”
It’s almost as if there were signs!
It’s almost as if there were signs!
November 29, 2025 at 5:32 PM
Everyone should read this terrifying thread about Hegseth’s published views wrt war crimes. It’s pretty fucking radical …. We needed to hear about this in his confirmation hearing.
Reposted by Sandra
“A European intelligence agency distributed a hard-copy report in a manila envelope to some of the continent’s most senior national security officials...inside were details of the commercial and economic plans the US had been pursuing with Russia, including jointly mining rare earths in the Arctic.”
November 29, 2025 at 6:01 AM
“A European intelligence agency distributed a hard-copy report in a manila envelope to some of the continent’s most senior national security officials...inside were details of the commercial and economic plans the US had been pursuing with Russia, including jointly mining rare earths in the Arctic.”
Reposted by Sandra
Reposted by Sandra
I mean, ultimately it's a normative argument, "You're a woman if you *should* be a woman".
They've a very "flexible" view of reality, until last year it was "you're only a woman if you're born with a vagina" and they've since moved on to "you're only a woman of your born with a vagina, have developed the potential to produce large gametes and don't have a SRY gene hanging about"
November 29, 2025 at 1:33 PM
I mean, ultimately it's a normative argument, "You're a woman if you *should* be a woman".
Reposted by Sandra
They've a very "flexible" view of reality, until last year it was "you're only a woman if you're born with a vagina" and they've since moved on to "you're only a woman of your born with a vagina, have developed the potential to produce large gametes and don't have a SRY gene hanging about"
November 29, 2025 at 11:22 AM
They've a very "flexible" view of reality, until last year it was "you're only a woman if you're born with a vagina" and they've since moved on to "you're only a woman of your born with a vagina, have developed the potential to produce large gametes and don't have a SRY gene hanging about"
Reposted by Sandra
The louder they shout about "biological reality", the more I can hear the "gay sex is unnatural" echoes from the 1980s.
Reactionary cunts, the lot of them. Then, and now.
Reactionary cunts, the lot of them. Then, and now.
November 29, 2025 at 10:58 AM
The louder they shout about "biological reality", the more I can hear the "gay sex is unnatural" echoes from the 1980s.
Reactionary cunts, the lot of them. Then, and now.
Reactionary cunts, the lot of them. Then, and now.
Reposted by Sandra
Reposted by Sandra
Tallinnas on eluohtlik tänavat ületada.
November 29, 2025 at 11:11 AM
Tallinnas on eluohtlik tänavat ületada.
Reposted by Sandra
The problem with fetishizing the rule of law is that people have to break the law to resist fascism, state violence, and oppression. This has always been true, and is very much the case RIGHT NOW.
November 29, 2025 at 1:44 AM
The problem with fetishizing the rule of law is that people have to break the law to resist fascism, state violence, and oppression. This has always been true, and is very much the case RIGHT NOW.
Reposted by Sandra
Reposted by Sandra
It's about normalising, in the application of law, the disregarding of trans identities. They aren't able to change the actual law while we are still subject to Euro Courts but are able to make everyone think that its okay to harass and disrespect trans people through demonstrations like this.
Do they think people who read their judgement won’t be able to determine their bias from it?
More importantly, I’m now curious about the standards and options for recusal when biased against a claimant. Research time.
More importantly, I’m now curious about the standards and options for recusal when biased against a claimant. Research time.
November 29, 2025 at 9:35 AM
It's about normalising, in the application of law, the disregarding of trans identities. They aren't able to change the actual law while we are still subject to Euro Courts but are able to make everyone think that its okay to harass and disrespect trans people through demonstrations like this.
Reposted by Sandra
You can not define woman in a way that includes all cis women and no trans women
You can not legislate away trans women's access to healthcare without opening the door to discrimination for all women's healthcare
You can not legislate away trans women's access to healthcare without opening the door to discrimination for all women's healthcare
It's very simple: you struggled to access your bodily autonomy, and eventually got it, and trans people did the same. Now you're using the arguments that were used to harm you, to harm others. That last part I cannot make sense of.
November 28, 2025 at 8:28 PM
You can not define woman in a way that includes all cis women and no trans women
You can not legislate away trans women's access to healthcare without opening the door to discrimination for all women's healthcare
You can not legislate away trans women's access to healthcare without opening the door to discrimination for all women's healthcare
Reposted by Sandra
Reposted by Sandra
As a corollary to this: there are a lot of artists who will black-list you from BUYING art if you have AI slop in your profile. Seeing AI is an instant, immediate red flag for most artists because it's a signal that you do not respect artists (yes, that includes using it "until I can get real art").
Just so you know...
Art directors, Art enjoyers, Art buyers and Artists talk with each other. Nobody wants AI slop, specially when there is real art out there as an alternative. You can totally get blacklisted, not only on the industry, but inside fandoms for defending AI precarization and theft.
Art directors, Art enjoyers, Art buyers and Artists talk with each other. Nobody wants AI slop, specially when there is real art out there as an alternative. You can totally get blacklisted, not only on the industry, but inside fandoms for defending AI precarization and theft.
November 25, 2025 at 3:40 PM
As a corollary to this: there are a lot of artists who will black-list you from BUYING art if you have AI slop in your profile. Seeing AI is an instant, immediate red flag for most artists because it's a signal that you do not respect artists (yes, that includes using it "until I can get real art").
Reposted by Sandra
New Study: Gender-Affirming Care Dramatically Lowers Suicide Risk for Trans Kids
truthout.org/article...
#transgender #trans #LGBTQ #LGBTQIA
truthout.org/article...
#transgender #trans #LGBTQ #LGBTQIA
New Study: Gender-Affirming Care Dramatically Lowers Suicide Risk for Trans Kids
Twenty-seven states in the US ban gender-affirming treatments for trans youth, including hormone therapy.
truthout.org
November 29, 2025 at 1:20 AM
New Study: Gender-Affirming Care Dramatically Lowers Suicide Risk for Trans Kids
truthout.org/article...
#transgender #trans #LGBTQ #LGBTQIA
truthout.org/article...
#transgender #trans #LGBTQ #LGBTQIA
Reposted by Sandra
Elon Musk and the Trump administration gleefully shutting down USAID “has already caused the deaths of six hundred thousand people, two-thirds of them children.”
People throw around terms like genocide quite freely online but it’s hard to find other words to describe this level of man-made death.
People throw around terms like genocide quite freely online but it’s hard to find other words to describe this level of man-made death.
USAID shutdown has led to hundreds of thousands of deaths | Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
The Trump administration’s decision to shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths from infectious diseases and malnutrition, accord...
hsph.harvard.edu
November 28, 2025 at 11:24 AM
Elon Musk and the Trump administration gleefully shutting down USAID “has already caused the deaths of six hundred thousand people, two-thirds of them children.”
People throw around terms like genocide quite freely online but it’s hard to find other words to describe this level of man-made death.
People throw around terms like genocide quite freely online but it’s hard to find other words to describe this level of man-made death.
Reposted by Sandra
His family coming out in focrce against him is setting the example for the rest of the nation.
Do not be a safe harbor for Nazis.
Do not be a safe harbor for Nazis.
November 28, 2025 at 6:36 PM
His family coming out in focrce against him is setting the example for the rest of the nation.
Do not be a safe harbor for Nazis.
Do not be a safe harbor for Nazis.