Dreamliner Again
@entirelyharmless.bsky.social
Biological | Perpetually bemused | Occasionally amused | She/Her | 🏳️⚧️🇩🇪🇪🇺
Pinned
The question is, do you feel lucky, human? Well do ya?
Reposted by Dreamliner Again
Leave her alone you fucking ghouls. She did nothing wrong.
February 15, 2026 at 5:29 PM
Leave her alone you fucking ghouls. She did nothing wrong.
Reposted by Dreamliner Again
Gender pay gap won't close for another 30 years.
Myth of equality used to hike women's state pension age.
Women hold 69% of low-paid & insecure jobs.
Women hit first by benefit cuts, wage freezes, two-child benefit cap. More likely to be unpaid carers.
Why are govt policies loaded against women?
Myth of equality used to hike women's state pension age.
Women hold 69% of low-paid & insecure jobs.
Women hit first by benefit cuts, wage freezes, two-child benefit cap. More likely to be unpaid carers.
Why are govt policies loaded against women?
Gender pay gap won't close until 2056, warns Trades Union Congress
The average woman employee
www.bbc.co.uk
February 15, 2026 at 5:42 PM
Gender pay gap won't close for another 30 years.
Myth of equality used to hike women's state pension age.
Women hold 69% of low-paid & insecure jobs.
Women hit first by benefit cuts, wage freezes, two-child benefit cap. More likely to be unpaid carers.
Why are govt policies loaded against women?
Myth of equality used to hike women's state pension age.
Women hold 69% of low-paid & insecure jobs.
Women hit first by benefit cuts, wage freezes, two-child benefit cap. More likely to be unpaid carers.
Why are govt policies loaded against women?
Reposted by Dreamliner Again
If you want to understand why the BBC's stance on trans rights - only platforming cis people (and only those with a sceptical perspective) - is so outrageous imagine if it only platformed men talking about women's rights (and only those with a sceptical perspective).
February 15, 2026 at 4:33 PM
If you want to understand why the BBC's stance on trans rights - only platforming cis people (and only those with a sceptical perspective) - is so outrageous imagine if it only platformed men talking about women's rights (and only those with a sceptical perspective).
I might have to add Cass to my list of muted words.
I’m sick of seeing her.
I’m sick of hearing her dogshit bigotry passed off as expertise.
Just… eurgh.
I’m sick of seeing her.
I’m sick of hearing her dogshit bigotry passed off as expertise.
Just… eurgh.
February 15, 2026 at 5:00 PM
I might have to add Cass to my list of muted words.
I’m sick of seeing her.
I’m sick of hearing her dogshit bigotry passed off as expertise.
Just… eurgh.
I’m sick of seeing her.
I’m sick of hearing her dogshit bigotry passed off as expertise.
Just… eurgh.
A doctor hounded out of the NHS… because she’s trans.
Dozens of trans kids’ lives ended tragically early.
WI branches closing down because of transphobia.
The self-declared protectors of women and girls must be so proud.
Dozens of trans kids’ lives ended tragically early.
WI branches closing down because of transphobia.
The self-declared protectors of women and girls must be so proud.
February 15, 2026 at 4:58 PM
A doctor hounded out of the NHS… because she’s trans.
Dozens of trans kids’ lives ended tragically early.
WI branches closing down because of transphobia.
The self-declared protectors of women and girls must be so proud.
Dozens of trans kids’ lives ended tragically early.
WI branches closing down because of transphobia.
The self-declared protectors of women and girls must be so proud.
I still find it staggering that a clinician who put so much time into “researching” trans kids can come out with utter garbage like this, with a straight face.
She has learned *nothing*.
It would help considerably if she *listened*, but she appears incapable of this.
She has learned *nothing*.
It would help considerably if she *listened*, but she appears incapable of this.
and then cass has the absolute nerve to go on the bbc and say shit like this
February 15, 2026 at 4:29 PM
I still find it staggering that a clinician who put so much time into “researching” trans kids can come out with utter garbage like this, with a straight face.
She has learned *nothing*.
It would help considerably if she *listened*, but she appears incapable of this.
She has learned *nothing*.
It would help considerably if she *listened*, but she appears incapable of this.
Imagine, if you will, a photo of the EHRC chair standing proudly alongside white supremacists...
This picture tells us everything we already knew, the bias of the EHRC was blatant.
February 15, 2026 at 11:02 AM
Imagine, if you will, a photo of the EHRC chair standing proudly alongside white supremacists...
Narrator: not, in fact, an expert. Cass said so herself.
The expert who led the review into children's gender healthcare in the UK has said young people have been "weaponised" and misled about the realities of transitioning by social media.
Children 'weaponised', says author of UK gender report
The expert who led the review into children's gender healthcare in the UK has said young people have been "weaponised" and misled about the realities of transitioning by social media.
www.rte.ie
February 15, 2026 at 11:01 AM
Narrator: not, in fact, an expert. Cass said so herself.
Reposted by Dreamliner Again
Anyone know how I can contact the editors of BBC News/Kuenssberg…?They have not balanced Cass with someone advocating on behalf of trans children. That is in breach of their charter.
February 15, 2026 at 9:56 AM
Anyone know how I can contact the editors of BBC News/Kuenssberg…?They have not balanced Cass with someone advocating on behalf of trans children. That is in breach of their charter.
“For Women Scotland”, for those who don’t know, comprises precisely three (3) women.
Susan Smith of For Women Scotland is quoted in this piece saying that Dr Upton leaving the NHS will be "a relief to female patients."
The employment tribunal found that Upton had done nothing wrong! She was completely innocent of any kind of harassment!
www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/1592555...
The employment tribunal found that Upton had done nothing wrong! She was completely innocent of any kind of harassment!
www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/1592555...
Trans doc at centre of landmark Sandi Peggie court battle quits NHS
THE trans medic at the heart of a changing room war that cost taxpayers a staggering £400,000 has walked out on the NHS. NHS Fife bosses racked up the eye-watering bill in a failed bid to hush up n…
www.thescottishsun.co.uk
February 15, 2026 at 9:56 AM
“For Women Scotland”, for those who don’t know, comprises precisely three (3) women.
Reposted by Dreamliner Again
3. I do think that the judgment gives the strongest signal we have had that trans-inclusive provision will be held to be lawful by the courts. These two passages directly contradict core claims made over the past year by gender critical lawyers.
February 15, 2026 at 8:33 AM
3. I do think that the judgment gives the strongest signal we have had that trans-inclusive provision will be held to be lawful by the courts. These two passages directly contradict core claims made over the past year by gender critical lawyers.
Rain lashing on windows.
What else are you gonna do? 🥰
What else are you gonna do? 🥰
February 15, 2026 at 8:05 AM
Rain lashing on windows.
What else are you gonna do? 🥰
What else are you gonna do? 🥰
Beth Upton.
I’d only just woken up from a poor night’s sleep.
Sorry, Dr Upton 🫣
I’d only just woken up from a poor night’s sleep.
Sorry, Dr Upton 🫣
I hope Beth Orton finds peace in her new life.
She never did anything wrong. All she did was exist.
The bigots who cheered on this lynch mob are vile. They’ll never be happy; no amount of trauma inflicted on trans people will ever be enough for them.
She never did anything wrong. All she did was exist.
The bigots who cheered on this lynch mob are vile. They’ll never be happy; no amount of trauma inflicted on trans people will ever be enough for them.
The disgustingly trans-hostile UK media are now hounding a trans doctor - who has already had the media spotlight on her as a victim of transphobia - because she’s decided to quit and flee the country to get away from the relentless transphobia! 😣😖
The UK media are BULLIES! 😤
The UK media are BULLIES! 😤
February 15, 2026 at 7:49 AM
Beth Upton.
I’d only just woken up from a poor night’s sleep.
Sorry, Dr Upton 🫣
I’d only just woken up from a poor night’s sleep.
Sorry, Dr Upton 🫣
Reposted by Dreamliner Again
I'm still not clear on what we're supposed to be doing with all the time gAI has freed up for us, now that we're not creating art, having our own conversations, making our own choices or having relationships with real people.
February 15, 2026 at 7:15 AM
I'm still not clear on what we're supposed to be doing with all the time gAI has freed up for us, now that we're not creating art, having our own conversations, making our own choices or having relationships with real people.
I hope Beth Orton finds peace in her new life.
She never did anything wrong. All she did was exist.
The bigots who cheered on this lynch mob are vile. They’ll never be happy; no amount of trauma inflicted on trans people will ever be enough for them.
She never did anything wrong. All she did was exist.
The bigots who cheered on this lynch mob are vile. They’ll never be happy; no amount of trauma inflicted on trans people will ever be enough for them.
The disgustingly trans-hostile UK media are now hounding a trans doctor - who has already had the media spotlight on her as a victim of transphobia - because she’s decided to quit and flee the country to get away from the relentless transphobia! 😣😖
The UK media are BULLIES! 😤
The UK media are BULLIES! 😤
February 15, 2026 at 7:18 AM
I hope Beth Orton finds peace in her new life.
She never did anything wrong. All she did was exist.
The bigots who cheered on this lynch mob are vile. They’ll never be happy; no amount of trauma inflicted on trans people will ever be enough for them.
She never did anything wrong. All she did was exist.
The bigots who cheered on this lynch mob are vile. They’ll never be happy; no amount of trauma inflicted on trans people will ever be enough for them.
How your email finds me
February 15, 2026 at 3:06 AM
How your email finds me
Reposted by Dreamliner Again
That the world is walking with intent, admittedly maleducated intent, into a pre WWI mind set with post WWII weapons is terrifying.
February 14, 2026 at 9:59 PM
That the world is walking with intent, admittedly maleducated intent, into a pre WWI mind set with post WWII weapons is terrifying.
Reposted by Dreamliner Again
New post: LABOUR'S SECTION 28 IS HERE - ACT NOW.
I explain how the Labour government's proposed revisions to the guidance on "keeping children in education" are designed to erase trans children in England. But it's not a done deal - there is plenty we can do to oppose this.
I explain how the Labour government's proposed revisions to the guidance on "keeping children in education" are designed to erase trans children in England. But it's not a done deal - there is plenty we can do to oppose this.
Labour’s Section 28 is here – act now
In May 1988, the Conservative government introduced Section 28. This legal measure outlawed support for “homosexuality as a pretended family relationship” across Britain, especially in …
ruthpearce.net
February 14, 2026 at 6:20 PM
New post: LABOUR'S SECTION 28 IS HERE - ACT NOW.
I explain how the Labour government's proposed revisions to the guidance on "keeping children in education" are designed to erase trans children in England. But it's not a done deal - there is plenty we can do to oppose this.
I explain how the Labour government's proposed revisions to the guidance on "keeping children in education" are designed to erase trans children in England. But it's not a done deal - there is plenty we can do to oppose this.
The Forstater appeal judge has a lot to answer for.
And also: how fucking absurd is it that businesses have to jump through these hoops, and trans people have to deal with our mere existence being debated every. Single. Day just because some middle aged women are obsessed with what’s in other people’s pants?
That’s a *them* problem, by rights.
That’s a *them* problem, by rights.
February 14, 2026 at 7:09 PM
The Forstater appeal judge has a lot to answer for.
Reposted by Dreamliner Again
I post under the same name that I write under quite deliberately, because I refuse to split my life from my work. Likewise, I refuse to split my transness from my womanhood. I am unwilling to accept that I only get to have one or the other.
February 14, 2026 at 6:57 PM
I post under the same name that I write under quite deliberately, because I refuse to split my life from my work. Likewise, I refuse to split my transness from my womanhood. I am unwilling to accept that I only get to have one or the other.
I’ll shut up now 🤐
February 14, 2026 at 6:40 PM
I’ll shut up now 🤐
Reposted by Dreamliner Again
Yesterday morning kids were sent running from their bus stop in panic because ICE showed up. This guy at today’s ICE Out of Lindenwold protest is a must watch 😭. @maddow.bsky.social
February 14, 2026 at 2:37 AM
Yesterday morning kids were sent running from their bus stop in panic because ICE showed up. This guy at today’s ICE Out of Lindenwold protest is a must watch 😭. @maddow.bsky.social
Hell yeah, Minneapolis! 👊🏻
February 14, 2026 at 6:05 PM
Hell yeah, Minneapolis! 👊🏻
One thing I missed: the court said that, if provision is not made (by services) for people who insist on religious or “belief” grounds that they can’t share facilities with
people who don’t match their ASAB, this *lack* of provision must pass the proportionate/legitimate test.
1/
people who don’t match their ASAB, this *lack* of provision must pass the proportionate/legitimate test.
1/
Having had 24 hours to absorb and reflect, one thing that strikes me about this summary is that, *save for the awful workplace requirements*, the high court’s emphasis on “proportionate and legitimate” brings us substantially back to where we were before.
What did I miss?
1/
What did I miss?
1/
Feeling confused about the High Court’s ruling? Read our FAQs on where this judgment leaves us and what happens next:
https://goodlaw.social/ioen
https://goodlaw.social/ioen
February 14, 2026 at 5:13 PM
One thing I missed: the court said that, if provision is not made (by services) for people who insist on religious or “belief” grounds that they can’t share facilities with
people who don’t match their ASAB, this *lack* of provision must pass the proportionate/legitimate test.
1/
people who don’t match their ASAB, this *lack* of provision must pass the proportionate/legitimate test.
1/
Having had 24 hours to absorb and reflect, one thing that strikes me about this summary is that, *save for the awful workplace requirements*, the high court’s emphasis on “proportionate and legitimate” brings us substantially back to where we were before.
What did I miss?
1/
What did I miss?
1/
Feeling confused about the High Court’s ruling? Read our FAQs on where this judgment leaves us and what happens next:
https://goodlaw.social/ioen
https://goodlaw.social/ioen
FAQ: Trans inclusion after the High Court decision on the EHRC’s interim guidance | Good Law Project
An explanation of where things stand for services and workplaces
goodlaw.social
February 14, 2026 at 4:50 PM
Having had 24 hours to absorb and reflect, one thing that strikes me about this summary is that, *save for the awful workplace requirements*, the high court’s emphasis on “proportionate and legitimate” brings us substantially back to where we were before.
What did I miss?
1/
What did I miss?
1/