Vibecession Forever
@ghazelleberner.bsky.social
If you blame/attack Democrats more than Republicans, you are not on the left.
Pinned
Someday, everyone needs to reckon with the utterly blasé attitude with which the internet left invokes the slaughter in Gaza as a rhetorical cudgel to beat social media enemies with.
It cheapens the suffering, has no positive benefit at all, and turns a real war crime into a meme. It’s disgusting.
It cheapens the suffering, has no positive benefit at all, and turns a real war crime into a meme. It’s disgusting.
Famine wasn’t a communist policy? Go to Kiev and say that.
Man, you people are drowning in the western propaganda.
Capitalism quite literally needs people to starve to death and live in poverty to scare people into maintaining their capitalist slavery so they don't slip into poverty themselves.
Famine wasn't a communist policy.
Capitalism quite literally needs people to starve to death and live in poverty to scare people into maintaining their capitalist slavery so they don't slip into poverty themselves.
Famine wasn't a communist policy.
February 15, 2026 at 5:50 PM
Famine wasn’t a communist policy? Go to Kiev and say that.
I have bad news for this person about the critics of capitalism.
Your head is so full of propaganda you assume every single person who has ever died in the Soviet Union is because of communism
If someone slips walking down the stairs it's because of communism
If someone slips walking down the stairs it's because of communism
February 15, 2026 at 5:48 PM
I have bad news for this person about the critics of capitalism.
Reposted by Vibecession Forever
it is almost never a good idea to lie “for the greater good”
February 15, 2026 at 3:57 PM
it is almost never a good idea to lie “for the greater good”
Reposted by Vibecession Forever
One of the funniest things I've seen on this site in some time
February 14, 2026 at 4:59 AM
One of the funniest things I've seen on this site in some time
Max Cady watching Problem Child (1990):
genuinely laughing so much rn this is so silly
February 14, 2026 at 4:43 AM
Max Cady watching Problem Child (1990):
Holy fuck the ratio on this
there would be no real concrete effects of an AOC presidency that would be materially different from a JD Vance presidency because they all work for the capitalist ruling class and not for us, yes including AOC. we don't need a different president we need a dictatorship of the proletariat.
This is about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
My earnest advice to you is to stop worrying about labels like "liberal" and "conservative" and think about the immediate, concrete, REAL effects of, say, an AOC presidency vs. A JD Vance presidency
My earnest advice to you is to stop worrying about labels like "liberal" and "conservative" and think about the immediate, concrete, REAL effects of, say, an AOC presidency vs. A JD Vance presidency
February 14, 2026 at 4:34 AM
Holy fuck the ratio on this
History is gonna look back on the 2016 election with increasing incredulity.
Not just at Trump’s supporters, but at all the people who let structural misogyny take the future away from them.
Not just at Trump’s supporters, but at all the people who let structural misogyny take the future away from them.
I love Biden and I love Harris, and I think they believe it too, but in so many ways Hillary ran on it, on the idea that America was ready to step into that shining future and people took a pass on it.
February 14, 2026 at 4:09 AM
History is gonna look back on the 2016 election with increasing incredulity.
Not just at Trump’s supporters, but at all the people who let structural misogyny take the future away from them.
Not just at Trump’s supporters, but at all the people who let structural misogyny take the future away from them.
An lot of the horrible people on here are antisocial 14 years olds.
I don’t mean that in like a name-call-y way. I mean it literally. It’s one of the biggest changes in internet use over the last decade.
I keep trying to remind myself of it when I get annoyed with people staying stupid shit.
I don’t mean that in like a name-call-y way. I mean it literally. It’s one of the biggest changes in internet use over the last decade.
I keep trying to remind myself of it when I get annoyed with people staying stupid shit.
I dunno folks. Find things to do with your life that aren’t trying to hurt other people
February 14, 2026 at 4:06 AM
An lot of the horrible people on here are antisocial 14 years olds.
I don’t mean that in like a name-call-y way. I mean it literally. It’s one of the biggest changes in internet use over the last decade.
I keep trying to remind myself of it when I get annoyed with people staying stupid shit.
I don’t mean that in like a name-call-y way. I mean it literally. It’s one of the biggest changes in internet use over the last decade.
I keep trying to remind myself of it when I get annoyed with people staying stupid shit.
I’d argue the big problem is that the proponents of theory two is that they’re the ones spewing the most misinformation about Democrats into the information environment.
If they actually believed their theory, they’d stop.
If they actually believed their theory, they’d stop.
Key point with low-information voters and flood-the-zone propaganda on social media: "Not engaging on the issue just lets that agitprop dominate low-info voters’ information streams ... [For many the] dominant sentiment was probably something like this: Wow, I didn’t know this was happening."
Behind all this is a deeper argument among Dems over how persuasion really works: The consultant class theory versus those who argue that the consultants are not seriously reckoning with the scale of today's information challenges.
I try to lay this out here. 4/
newrepublic.com/article/2059...
I try to lay this out here. 4/
newrepublic.com/article/2059...
February 13, 2026 at 11:59 PM
I’d argue the big problem is that the proponents of theory two is that they’re the ones spewing the most misinformation about Democrats into the information environment.
If they actually believed their theory, they’d stop.
If they actually believed their theory, they’d stop.
Every time one of the AI firms rolls out a real skill that replaces white collar workers, the market nosedives. Banking. Real estate. Etc. All in the last couple of weeks.
If this happened in 12 months, it would almost certainly trigger a depression before the jobs could even be replaced.
If this happened in 12 months, it would almost certainly trigger a depression before the jobs could even be replaced.
not for nothing, but this is in direct contradiction to what microsoft's own research team says. once again, the hypebeasts are the problem.
Microsoft AI CEO: 'Most, if not all' white-collar tasks can be replaced by AI within 12-18 months
Mustafa Suleyman, Microsoft's AI chief, says AI can automate white-collar jobs within 12-18 months, as tech reaches human-level performance in tasks.
www.businessinsider.com
February 13, 2026 at 11:56 PM
Every time one of the AI firms rolls out a real skill that replaces white collar workers, the market nosedives. Banking. Real estate. Etc. All in the last couple of weeks.
If this happened in 12 months, it would almost certainly trigger a depression before the jobs could even be replaced.
If this happened in 12 months, it would almost certainly trigger a depression before the jobs could even be replaced.
Reposted by Vibecession Forever
So whatever.
You can do litmus tests.
Or you can try to find ways to peel off right wingers, which is the ONLY way you can strip ICE of funding handed out last year.
Bernie got a 49-51 vote on that point. You need 12 votes.
You can do litmus tests.
Or you can try to find ways to peel off right wingers, which is the ONLY way you can strip ICE of funding handed out last year.
Bernie got a 49-51 vote on that point. You need 12 votes.
February 13, 2026 at 11:25 PM
So whatever.
You can do litmus tests.
Or you can try to find ways to peel off right wingers, which is the ONLY way you can strip ICE of funding handed out last year.
Bernie got a 49-51 vote on that point. You need 12 votes.
You can do litmus tests.
Or you can try to find ways to peel off right wingers, which is the ONLY way you can strip ICE of funding handed out last year.
Bernie got a 49-51 vote on that point. You need 12 votes.
I’d personally characterize this post as pro-misinformation.
February 13, 2026 at 11:29 PM
I’d personally characterize this post as pro-misinformation.
I feel confident that if social media existed in ‘08 as it does today, Obama would have lost.
After months of attacks calling him a homophobe “just as bad as the GOP” for his civil unions position (not to mention moderation on race), I just refuse to believe the enthusiasm would have been there.
After months of attacks calling him a homophobe “just as bad as the GOP” for his civil unions position (not to mention moderation on race), I just refuse to believe the enthusiasm would have been there.
the whole anti-trans thing is because Newsom is the most anti-trans candidate and one of the favorite so they're readying a defense for why they won't vote for Democrats
February 13, 2026 at 11:10 PM
I feel confident that if social media existed in ‘08 as it does today, Obama would have lost.
After months of attacks calling him a homophobe “just as bad as the GOP” for his civil unions position (not to mention moderation on race), I just refuse to believe the enthusiasm would have been there.
After months of attacks calling him a homophobe “just as bad as the GOP” for his civil unions position (not to mention moderation on race), I just refuse to believe the enthusiasm would have been there.
Gee, it’s almost like every person the Hillary people warned you about in 2016 sucks absolute shit.
Maybe worth thinking about that?
Maybe worth thinking about that?
I think more people should keep their insane thoughts to themselves.
February 13, 2026 at 10:59 PM
Gee, it’s almost like every person the Hillary people warned you about in 2016 sucks absolute shit.
Maybe worth thinking about that?
Maybe worth thinking about that?
We know you are. That’s the problem. It’s a stupid fucking thing to say.
I’m quite literally saying that voters should demand things from the politicians that are running for an office to extract material policies. Part of that relationship is politicians presenting their platform to voters. How is that not enforcing their will on the state? lol
February 13, 2026 at 10:48 PM
We know you are. That’s the problem. It’s a stupid fucking thing to say.
Do we do ratio awe on this platform? Because damn.
February 13, 2026 at 10:42 PM
Do we do ratio awe on this platform? Because damn.
Reposted by Vibecession Forever
given education polarization and MAGA's reliance on low propensity voters, something like the SAVE Act would almost certainly backfire on republicans (i'm reasonably sure senate republicans understand this too)
i'm against barriers to the fanchise but it would be extremely funny if the republicans enact barriers to voting and nuke their voter base
Been toying with the same thought. Pointless barriers to voting pitched as a solution to an imaginary problem are a bad idea in principle, but Republicans seem very sure it will help them on net, and that’s not really obvious to me.
February 13, 2026 at 10:20 PM
given education polarization and MAGA's reliance on low propensity voters, something like the SAVE Act would almost certainly backfire on republicans (i'm reasonably sure senate republicans understand this too)
The only people “inverting electoral responsibilities” are the Bluesky left.
Creating an intellectual framework to justify shitting on Kamala Harris 24/7 is embarrassing and sad.
But mostly, it’s counter to the ideals of democracy that people who fought for suffrage espoused.
Creating an intellectual framework to justify shitting on Kamala Harris 24/7 is embarrassing and sad.
But mostly, it’s counter to the ideals of democracy that people who fought for suffrage espoused.
The inversion of electorial responsibilities by American libeerals is extremely bizarre to me. It's a mentality that Democrats cannot fail voters, the voters fail Democrats. If "your guy" didn't win it has nothing to do with the guy and everything to do with a disobedient electorate.
February 13, 2026 at 9:53 PM
The only people “inverting electoral responsibilities” are the Bluesky left.
Creating an intellectual framework to justify shitting on Kamala Harris 24/7 is embarrassing and sad.
But mostly, it’s counter to the ideals of democracy that people who fought for suffrage espoused.
Creating an intellectual framework to justify shitting on Kamala Harris 24/7 is embarrassing and sad.
But mostly, it’s counter to the ideals of democracy that people who fought for suffrage espoused.
Where is this coming from? Literally the only people I hear shrieking about Newsom is the Bluesky left.
Is there a Newsom hive I’m not seeing? I’m a pretty normie Democrat.
Is there a Newsom hive I’m not seeing? I’m a pretty normie Democrat.
i do find it funny that every low-info, high-engagement leftist on this website thinks their (imagined) sworn enemies, the shitlibs, are all totally in the tank for gavin newsom.
anyway, it turns out that like half the people talking about this are talking about gavin newsom, who is never going to be president, and i am confident enough about this that i simply refuse to offer an opinion about whether i'd vote for him if i had to — i won't have to
February 13, 2026 at 9:51 PM
Where is this coming from? Literally the only people I hear shrieking about Newsom is the Bluesky left.
Is there a Newsom hive I’m not seeing? I’m a pretty normie Democrat.
Is there a Newsom hive I’m not seeing? I’m a pretty normie Democrat.
Reposted by Vibecession Forever
The biggest political divide on here is not between left and liberal but between "politics is real and involves real outcomes for real people" and "no it doesn't fuck you"
February 13, 2026 at 6:28 PM
The biggest political divide on here is not between left and liberal but between "politics is real and involves real outcomes for real people" and "no it doesn't fuck you"
So I genuinely think the easiest way to interpret the 2024 election within the context we have now is that people fucking hate this shit, not LGBT people or causes.
To put it simply: Eject Bluesky-ism, not LGBT communities.
To put it simply: Eject Bluesky-ism, not LGBT communities.
We are being scolded for using the term "gay" to describe a congresswoman who calls herself "gay" on her official government homepage. We are also being told that relying on such a source is "irrelevant" and that we should instead use other terms the congresswoman does not use on her homepage.
February 13, 2026 at 7:22 PM
So I genuinely think the easiest way to interpret the 2024 election within the context we have now is that people fucking hate this shit, not LGBT people or causes.
To put it simply: Eject Bluesky-ism, not LGBT communities.
To put it simply: Eject Bluesky-ism, not LGBT communities.
This is literally how Bluesky has been talking about this same topic.
Current state of things: One Fox News host casually declares that Epstein’s money comes from “Jewish billionaires” and a “Jewish banking family,” another responds that he was a “sex rabbi.” www.mediamatters.org/fox-news/jes...
February 13, 2026 at 2:18 PM
This is literally how Bluesky has been talking about this same topic.
Anyone who tries to pull this shit should immediately go on your own bullshit list.
For *some* reason, Platner gets a pass on stuff the online left would pitch a gigantic fit about if, say, a Buttigieg-coded candidate had it in their bio.
We don’t have to support people who lie about Nazi tattoos.
For *some* reason, Platner gets a pass on stuff the online left would pitch a gigantic fit about if, say, a Buttigieg-coded candidate had it in their bio.
We don’t have to support people who lie about Nazi tattoos.
Incredible
“Let's get this out of the way: Graham Platner isn't a Nazi. He had a Nazi tattoo, sure, but he doesn't anymore.”
“Let's get this out of the way: Graham Platner isn't a Nazi. He had a Nazi tattoo, sure, but he doesn't anymore.”
February 13, 2026 at 2:15 PM
Anyone who tries to pull this shit should immediately go on your own bullshit list.
For *some* reason, Platner gets a pass on stuff the online left would pitch a gigantic fit about if, say, a Buttigieg-coded candidate had it in their bio.
We don’t have to support people who lie about Nazi tattoos.
For *some* reason, Platner gets a pass on stuff the online left would pitch a gigantic fit about if, say, a Buttigieg-coded candidate had it in their bio.
We don’t have to support people who lie about Nazi tattoos.
People sometimes think I’m a capitalist because I was convinced by The Wealth of Nations or Milton Friedman or whatever.
When in reality, I mostly just learned about socialism and heard from socialists and eventually was like, “ok so definitely not this.”
When in reality, I mostly just learned about socialism and heard from socialists and eventually was like, “ok so definitely not this.”
i strongly encourage Marxist-Leninists and Maoists to be smarmy assholes to other socialists they perceive as insufficiently revolutionary, this can only go well
red dude might be turning green dude into a lib (laudatory) through negative polarization, let em cook
i didn't check profiles, "dude" is used in the Kenan & Kel/Good Burger gender-neutral sense here
i didn't check profiles, "dude" is used in the Kenan & Kel/Good Burger gender-neutral sense here
February 13, 2026 at 2:04 PM
People sometimes think I’m a capitalist because I was convinced by The Wealth of Nations or Milton Friedman or whatever.
When in reality, I mostly just learned about socialism and heard from socialists and eventually was like, “ok so definitely not this.”
When in reality, I mostly just learned about socialism and heard from socialists and eventually was like, “ok so definitely not this.”