Flamingogrrl
@flamingogrrl.bsky.social
Artist, cat lady, Progessive.
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
This appears to be Epstein's response to @jkbjournalist.bsky.social's Miami Herald report — www.miamiherald.com/news/local/a... — and involves a discussion with Michael Wolff about "plac[ing] a story."
Wolff: "They've won the high ground—young, vulnerable, poor girls."
Wolff: "They've won the high ground—young, vulnerable, poor girls."
![From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Michael Wolff
12/1/2018 3:57:27 PM
Jjeevacation@gmail.com]
Re:
Importance:
High
...all about Donald Trump, the real villain.
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:56 AM Michael Wolff <
> wrote:
Claims are ludicrous and self-serving, media is working with the other side's lawyers, this is all about Donald Trump.
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:53 AM Michael Wolff
He never tries to explain. He denies, blames media, denigrates someone else.
wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:51 AM J {jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: im aware. im thinking what would trump do
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:49 AM Michael Wolffi
wrote:
At this point I don't think you can go legalistic. They've won the high ground
-young, vulnerable, poor
girls.
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 10:44 AM J < jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
do you think we highlight, that at the end of the day it was prositution. sex for money. • a state crime. with state laws.
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 9:18 AM Michael Wolff don't tweet this
wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 9:13 AM J {jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 9:09 AM Michael Wolff
wrote:
This thing as model journalism is one more element that could give it legs--so another danger. I don't think it's a question now of directly debunking this. That's going against virtue itself. What I'd like to do is game out everything, creating a structure for thinking this through. Definitely not a piecemeal response. Figure out where we want to be and where we can reasonably get and work backwards.
Maybe we do agree to a big interview with you--Landon Thomas or something like that. But this has to be war gamed out. Obviously I can contribute, Kathy can, would be great to get SB input, but this needs a structure, that's why I think Hiltzig or somebody assembling a plan would be helpful. Even if in the end you decide to do nothing, at least you've come up with a structured way to think about it.
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 8:57 AM J < jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
kathy thought the piece i…](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36eqtmzysqf7wsslczw4uxcd/bafkreictod4tci3sponasveu4jia7vm2x53j6vwbbg5lz5lrphamyf6kwm@jpeg)
November 13, 2025 at 12:24 AM
This appears to be Epstein's response to @jkbjournalist.bsky.social's Miami Herald report — www.miamiherald.com/news/local/a... — and involves a discussion with Michael Wolff about "plac[ing] a story."
Wolff: "They've won the high ground—young, vulnerable, poor girls."
Wolff: "They've won the high ground—young, vulnerable, poor girls."
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
Trump refuses to answer questions about Jeffrey Epstein and kicks the White House Press Pool out of the Oval Office:
November 13, 2025 at 3:55 AM
Trump refuses to answer questions about Jeffrey Epstein and kicks the White House Press Pool out of the Oval Office:
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
“We can’t answer right now because we’re working on our messaging about how teenage girls aren’t that young and all this is okay.”
Trump just ignored a bunch of reporter questions about Epstein in the Oval Office.
November 13, 2025 at 3:56 AM
“We can’t answer right now because we’re working on our messaging about how teenage girls aren’t that young and all this is okay.”
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
Everyone on the Epstein list did not "have sex" with young girls …. they RAPED THEM.
Children, there’s a difference.
Children, there’s a difference.
November 12, 2025 at 11:36 PM
Everyone on the Epstein list did not "have sex" with young girls …. they RAPED THEM.
Children, there’s a difference.
Children, there’s a difference.
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
Of course they'd try to bury a story from The Daily Beast, which for more than a decade pulled no punches and held scumbags accountable.
I'm proud to have spent three years there.
I'm proud to have spent three years there.
🚨 An example from newly-released files showing how consultants sought to influence Google search results — burying articles about Jeffrey Epstein being a "billionaire pedophile" or having a "diary of his under-aged victims" & then boosting articles about his philanthropy
November 12, 2025 at 10:33 PM
Of course they'd try to bury a story from The Daily Beast, which for more than a decade pulled no punches and held scumbags accountable.
I'm proud to have spent three years there.
I'm proud to have spent three years there.
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
Somewhere, in a lonely data center, an AI is training on 23,000 pages of Epstein docs
November 13, 2025 at 4:06 AM
Somewhere, in a lonely data center, an AI is training on 23,000 pages of Epstein docs
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
Analysis | The Epstein revelations have roiled Trump’s base. Here’s how many kids worldwide his administration will have to starve to win the base back.
November 13, 2025 at 3:43 AM
Analysis | The Epstein revelations have roiled Trump’s base. Here’s how many kids worldwide his administration will have to starve to win the base back.
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
New York Times social media guidelines prohibit expression suggesting partiality on things like ICE, execution of foreigners in fishing boats, or whether law is a thing.
However, tipping off notorious serial pedophiles about other reporters is absolutely fine.
However, tipping off notorious serial pedophiles about other reporters is absolutely fine.
Fall 2017: Then-NYT reporter literally warning Epstein that someone is "digging around again."
![From:
Thomas Jr., Landon
Sent:
9/27/2017 2:47:47 PM
To:
Subject:
Got another call from Connelly..
Importance:
High
Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]
He is digging around again -- not clear if its another book/or expanded paperback version. Was asking me all sorts of questions about why you hired Ken Starr. I told him I had no idea - I think he is doing some Trump-related digging too.
Anyway, for what its worth...
Landon Thomas, Jr.
Financial Reporter
New York Times
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon_ir thomas/index.h
tml](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36eqtmzysqf7wsslczw4uxcd/bafkreia6463yzmb2suqn5rbfslvtta667av3ryynaetbsl7x6tniezyawu@jpeg)
November 13, 2025 at 4:09 AM
New York Times social media guidelines prohibit expression suggesting partiality on things like ICE, execution of foreigners in fishing boats, or whether law is a thing.
However, tipping off notorious serial pedophiles about other reporters is absolutely fine.
However, tipping off notorious serial pedophiles about other reporters is absolutely fine.
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
Love this and how often our Mississippi Free Press shows up in these lists. 💜
Y’all can support us here:
givebutter.com/mfpdonate
Y’all can support us here:
givebutter.com/mfpdonate
November 13, 2025 at 4:10 AM
Love this and how often our Mississippi Free Press shows up in these lists. 💜
Y’all can support us here:
givebutter.com/mfpdonate
Y’all can support us here:
givebutter.com/mfpdonate
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
hear me out, maybe it’s time to stop making men the president for awhile
November 13, 2025 at 4:10 AM
hear me out, maybe it’s time to stop making men the president for awhile
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
It all would have been much easier if, as would have happened if we were remotely a serious country, it all ended with the Access Hollywood interview.
November 13, 2025 at 3:46 AM
It all would have been much easier if, as would have happened if we were remotely a serious country, it all ended with the Access Hollywood interview.
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
Again, important to know, but we need all the files to know who is and isn't in them. Epstein's words alone aren't enough.
Jeffrey Epstein Said Bill Clinton Was ‘Never On the Island’ In Newly Released Emails
Jeffrey Epstein Said Bill Clinton Was ‘Never On the Island’ In Newly Released Emails
Dead sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein said former President Bill Clinton "never" visited his so-called "Epstein Island," according to newly released emails
The post Jeffrey Epstein Said Bill Clinton Was ‘Never On the Island’ In Newly Released Emails first appeared on Mediaite.
dlvr.it
November 13, 2025 at 3:09 AM
Again, important to know, but we need all the files to know who is and isn't in them. Epstein's words alone aren't enough.
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
How much of piece of shit garbage human being do you have to be for a piece of shit garbage human being like Jeffrey Epstein to call you a piece of shit garbage human being?
November 13, 2025 at 3:16 AM
How much of piece of shit garbage human being do you have to be for a piece of shit garbage human being like Jeffrey Epstein to call you a piece of shit garbage human being?
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
November 13, 2025 at 3:17 AM
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
If **Jeffrey Epstein** thinks you're a evil and demented sociopath, the odds are overwhelming that you are, in fact, an evil and demented sociopath.
November 13, 2025 at 2:18 AM
If **Jeffrey Epstein** thinks you're a evil and demented sociopath, the odds are overwhelming that you are, in fact, an evil and demented sociopath.
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
He's on a mission from God.
What's from Chicago, hates Illinois Nazis, and is holy as fuck?
It's the Pope in 1982.
It's the Pope in 1982.
November 13, 2025 at 3:22 AM
He's on a mission from God.
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
This. Never forget.
Thomas Massie to CNN on the Epstein files: "This vote is gonna be on your record for longer than Trump is gonna be president. And what are you gonna do in 2028 and 2030 when you're in a debate … and they say, 'How can we trust you? You covered up for a pedophile back in 2025.'"
November 13, 2025 at 3:24 AM
This. Never forget.
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
For folks (and journalists) who want to search the Oversight Committee email texts, I made a database for searching the 20k text files:
splendorous-chaja-f79791.netlify.app
splendorous-chaja-f79791.netlify.app
Epstein Document Search
splendorous-chaja-f79791.netlify.app
November 13, 2025 at 3:28 AM
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
OH you mean the guy who refused to investigate sexual abuse among students when he was chancellor at Baylor was chummy with Epstein? NO I REFUSE TO BELIEVE IT
Republican legal icon and Clinton scourge Ken Starr signs off a touching note to Jeffrey Epstein with "hugs." Amazing.
November 13, 2025 at 3:29 AM
OH you mean the guy who refused to investigate sexual abuse among students when he was chancellor at Baylor was chummy with Epstein? NO I REFUSE TO BELIEVE IT
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
Discuss. Or at least investigated for it. Due process and all.
At what point does the New York Times get charged as organizationally conspiring to abet human trafficking of minors.
November 13, 2025 at 3:26 AM
Discuss. Or at least investigated for it. Due process and all.
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
Reporter: Can you respond to these Epstein emails that were released today?
Trump: *no answer*
Trump: *no answer*
November 13, 2025 at 3:28 AM
Reporter: Can you respond to these Epstein emails that were released today?
Trump: *no answer*
Trump: *no answer*
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
This is how someone with critical thinking skills, morals and values responds to this situation.
It’s the only right answer.
If you can’t be critical of “your side” then your identity is tied to a political party and you’ve sacrificed your entire character for a corrupt entity.
It’s the only right answer.
If you can’t be critical of “your side” then your identity is tied to a political party and you’ve sacrificed your entire character for a corrupt entity.
"This could take down Democrats, too."
I know. And I frankly wouldn't give even an itty bitty damn if it implicated every Democratic man in Congress, every Democratic hopeful for 2028 and every Democrat who has even thought about running for office.
Down with the sex predators, wherever they are.
I know. And I frankly wouldn't give even an itty bitty damn if it implicated every Democratic man in Congress, every Democratic hopeful for 2028 and every Democrat who has even thought about running for office.
Down with the sex predators, wherever they are.
November 13, 2025 at 1:32 AM
This is how someone with critical thinking skills, morals and values responds to this situation.
It’s the only right answer.
If you can’t be critical of “your side” then your identity is tied to a political party and you’ve sacrificed your entire character for a corrupt entity.
It’s the only right answer.
If you can’t be critical of “your side” then your identity is tied to a political party and you’ve sacrificed your entire character for a corrupt entity.
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
I think Republican leaders should study what has happened throughout the last century or two of international history when a populace with this kind of inequity rubbed in its face day after day, year after year, finally snaps. www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/u...
Lines at the Food Pantry, Billionaires at the White House
www.nytimes.com
November 13, 2025 at 1:42 AM
I think Republican leaders should study what has happened throughout the last century or two of international history when a populace with this kind of inequity rubbed in its face day after day, year after year, finally snaps. www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/u...
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
All the way back to Whitewater, you say the name "Clinton" in the NYT newsroom and they are on it like rats finding a tasty corpse.
November 13, 2025 at 1:45 AM
All the way back to Whitewater, you say the name "Clinton" in the NYT newsroom and they are on it like rats finding a tasty corpse.
Reposted by Flamingogrrl
So many of her colleagues very stridently defended Maggie's work during the first Trump term and told us how she was this top-notch journalist, and here she is falling for a book that was a Steve Bannon ratfucking scheme.
About the same time the NYT sat on a scoop tying Trump to Epstein, Maggie Haberman was downright giddy (y'all) about NYT promoting an anti-Hillary Clinton book.
November 13, 2025 at 1:42 AM
So many of her colleagues very stridently defended Maggie's work during the first Trump term and told us how she was this top-notch journalist, and here she is falling for a book that was a Steve Bannon ratfucking scheme.