elaine
elainealimonti.bsky.social
elaine
@elainealimonti.bsky.social
Reposted by elaine
Summers said this woman saw him as a mentor. To try to manipulate that into sex is so horrifically predatory…

And then you add the wild power imbalance given his professional standing. And the 20+ year age difference.

And THEN you add that he sought advice on this from Epstein. In 2018.

Hideous.
November 17, 2025 at 6:44 AM
Reposted by elaine
I love the “so-called landscapers” comment, too. They were there being paid to landscape! They’re landscapers!
November 17, 2025 at 9:48 PM
Reposted by elaine
If someone wants me to define “police state” I’ll just show them this
FOX: Here's a viral video of landscapers who were being addressed by a CBP agent. What do you say to people who say that falls outside the purview of getting criminals out?

GREG BOVINO: Martha, do we know the criminal records of those so-called landscapers?
November 17, 2025 at 9:35 PM
Reposted by elaine
POV: you are a young woman celebrating a recent academic success
November 17, 2025 at 7:20 PM
Reposted by elaine
By Olivia Nuzzi.
Look I’m just trying to prepare y’all for the inevitable VF profile on “the quiet strength” of Majorie Taylor Greene
November 17, 2025 at 9:56 PM
Reposted by elaine
Colleague just got an email that starts: "Here's a polished and respectful letter you can send to your professor"
Email from a student who turned in a ChatGPT essay. Not even looking at the ChatGPT output in the apology 🥴
November 17, 2025 at 9:28 PM
Reposted by elaine
The executive has encouraged the legislature to compel the executive to release files the executive holds and has chosen not to release despite calls from legislators. It's unclear whether the executive will veto the legislature's bill, and whether the legislature will over-ride the executive's veto
November 17, 2025 at 4:16 PM
Reposted by elaine
just because the clown car goes very fast does not mean it isn't full of clowns
BREAKING: Magistrate orders DOJ to turn over grand jury materials to Comey, finding real prospect that "government misconduct" may have tainted the case.
November 17, 2025 at 4:23 PM
Reposted by elaine
So good
November 16, 2025 at 3:26 PM
Reposted by elaine
/4 The point is that the NYT has chosen a very specific way to look at the world — one of fatuous moral and political equivalence — and can’t expect anyone to read its stories outside of that frame. It’s perfectly plausible to think the Times would say “rape is bad. But the lost camaraderie!”
November 16, 2025 at 5:03 PM
Reposted by elaine
The undergrads at the Crimson has consistently done a better job at investigating stories--big and small--than some of the legacy papers. Go college journalism.
gosh I wonder why they called her peril www.thecrimson.com/article/2025...
November 17, 2025 at 3:26 AM
Reposted by elaine
Larry Summers needs to resign or be pushed out of Harvard. This is absolutely unacceptable.
The emails have Summers reporting to Epstein about his attempts to date a Harvard economics student & to hit on her during a seminar she was giving.
November 16, 2025 at 1:50 AM
Reposted by elaine
Never forget that just a week ago, Ross Douthat and the NYTimes were asking if women ruined the workplace.
November 17, 2025 at 3:33 AM
Reposted by elaine
hey ... let me ask a question... are the reporters disgusted?????
November 14, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Reposted by elaine
The only thing that's interesting about Nuzzi is the story of how an amoral careerist with no interest in policy and abysmal ethics became an acclaimed national political reporter. But rather than tell that story, the entire media seems desperate to play a part in it.
It rocks that all 20 people who genuinely think the Olivia Nuzzi stuff is interesting have editorial discretion at major media outlets. Just publish your group chats
November 15, 2025 at 1:36 AM
Reposted by elaine
She has produced no work of substance! Her 'achievements' in journalism are all just gossipy details she got through personal access. She also had relationship with a source while covering his political rival and lied about it until confronted! She should be treated like Stephen Glass.
November 15, 2025 at 1:49 AM
Reposted by elaine
These people cannot stop being fucking weird man
Trump blares Phantom of the Opera at the White House with an empty Friday schedule
November 15, 2025 at 12:12 AM
Reposted by elaine
It’s been a year to the day we bought (and then didn’t, for reasons we still don’t fully know) InfoWars. We’re still trying. In the year since, we built The Onion into one of the biggest newspapers in the United States. I’m so proud of this place. I’m proud we do hard stuff. Thank you for caring.
November 15, 2025 at 12:12 AM
Reposted by elaine
WE WON. I am *begging* you to take note of who did this. *Not* UCLA admin—they’re still scuttling around behind closed doors, attempting to appease—but FACULTY AND STAFF, led by AAUP.
BREAKING: In AAUP et al v. Trump (wall-to-wall union lawsuit challenging the administration’s unlawful use of TItle VI to reshape the University of California system), the faculty and staff of the UC system WON!!!

We were granted our preliminary injunction! @aaup.org
November 15, 2025 at 12:01 AM
Reposted by elaine
From this minister's op-ed: "People wanting to experience God are more likely to meet the Divine trying to shut down the Broadview, Illinois, ICE facility than we ever were in church...God does not live in our houses of worship, but...with those who are bearing the brunt of cruelty in this moment."
Oh wow @reuters.com got the photo here:
November 14, 2025 at 9:38 PM
Reposted by elaine
The important thing is not whether the Trump performing sexual favors for Bill Clinton thing is true. The important thing is that we all pretend it’s true, and that someone asks Trump about it every day.
November 14, 2025 at 9:47 PM
Reposted by elaine
Oh wow @reuters.com got the photo here:
November 14, 2025 at 9:25 PM
Reposted by elaine
I dream of a day when corporations have to reapply for every tax break, contract, and grant every six months, with a requirement that it is the CEO who must complete the paperwork, and attest under penalty of law that they personally did so.
The shutdown was an excuse, not a reason, to go after SNAP.

SNAP recipients have to re-apply either every 6 months or year. Onerous process, with almost no fraud.

There are no shutdown-related requirement for SNAP renewal. But it would predictably result in low-income families going hungry.
Brooke Rollins says on Newsmax SNAP participants will have to re-apply for the program.

Details are still unclear.

via Grace Yarrow for @politico.com

www.politico.com/news/2025/11...
November 14, 2025 at 8:35 PM
Reposted by elaine
NYT EDITORIAL DESK

"did you do that Nuzzi profile?"

"sure did, boss, real fuckin sexy, just like you liked"

"you're correct, i did ask for that, now time to search for my name in the epstein emails"
The credulity.
November 14, 2025 at 6:01 PM
Reposted by elaine
This is *depraved* -- glamor shots & an exculpatory feature for a woman who shit on the key central tenets of journalism, repeatedly.

NYT is celebrating elite freedom from accountability. Actively celebrating it. You wouldn't put this in a satire, it's too ham-handed!
what the actual fuck
November 14, 2025 at 6:25 PM