Dave Kasten
davekasten.bsky.social
Dave Kasten
@davekasten.bsky.social
Do what seems cool next.

"You need to learn WHY things work on a starship."-Admiral James T. Kirk
Reposted by Dave Kasten
somehow the crown we threw in the gutter is going to be waiting for us to pick it up when we're able
Much like USAid, if the rest of the world wanted to replace what the US has done for the last 80 years, they would have been doing it already
people predicting a "post-American world" really over their skis
November 21, 2025 at 1:18 PM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
Kash Patel's personal firing of the Pride flag-displaying employee was always absurd and unconstitutional, so I'm glad David Maltinsky is suing, but, wait.

It was a flag FLOWN BY THE FBI that was given to him BY THE FBI?! Come on.

Complaint: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
November 20, 2025 at 9:56 PM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
excuse me only Beatrix Kiddo can do this
November 20, 2025 at 3:40 PM
Yup. I had a trans coworker as a teenager in Ohio under the Bush Administration.
Today is the Transgender Day of Remembrance. Trans people have literally always been here; every time I see someone sneering "oh but there were no trans people when I was in high school," well. I dated a trans girl in high school, and was close friends with a trans guy.
November 20, 2025 at 4:42 PM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
These CRIMINALS keep demanding JURY TRIALS to establish whether they are, in fact, CRIMINALS. We must put an end to this
November 20, 2025 at 4:18 PM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
I feel like I need to keep reiterating that general purpose chatbots are probably the most complicated use of all the possibilities with this modern iteration of AI
November 20, 2025 at 11:41 AM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
French authorities are taking X to court because Grok is now doing straight up holocaust denial. Gas chambers intended for disinfection, cyanide residue tiny, ‘story’ persists because of taboo against critical examination. (Full translation in alt text)
November 20, 2025 at 1:03 PM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
if you do not think that your multiple ton hunk of metal which you are flinging down the highway at sixty miles per hour will eventually kill someone you are not qualified to work on any such thing
November 20, 2025 at 2:04 AM
Yuuuup. Very true in general. We've decided we're racing in no particular direction at max speed, and damn the torpedoes
i thought: as long as i can steer toward the destination, i'm willing, i guess, to hold the rudder no matter how bad the idea to go fast is. then they decided we didn't need a rudder.
Just a lot of "it's going to happen anyways so I might as well be the one to do it." I can't work that way. I need to really believe that my work is going to make the world better with some reasonable confidence
November 18, 2025 at 9:39 PM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
Bluesky, where you can watch me thinking through a moral crisis in public
November 18, 2025 at 8:47 PM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
It really, really does not feel like many of the people pushing AI and robotics to go as fast as possible have a good model of how it's going to go well
November 18, 2025 at 8:44 PM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
i thought: as long as i can steer toward the destination, i'm willing, i guess, to hold the rudder no matter how bad the idea to go fast is. then they decided we didn't need a rudder.
Just a lot of "it's going to happen anyways so I might as well be the one to do it." I can't work that way. I need to really believe that my work is going to make the world better with some reasonable confidence
November 18, 2025 at 9:21 PM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
i am completely comfortable with going fast. i am completely comfortable figuring out where as you're going. i recognize that this is risky and weird, but i tend to high risk tolerance. i should maybe not be in charge due to this.

the dominant paradigm is "not even trying to figure it out"
i thought: as long as i can steer toward the destination, i'm willing, i guess, to hold the rudder no matter how bad the idea to go fast is. then they decided we didn't need a rudder.
Just a lot of "it's going to happen anyways so I might as well be the one to do it." I can't work that way. I need to really believe that my work is going to make the world better with some reasonable confidence
November 18, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
there have been a lot of good papers which have the thesis "AI is bad" and a lot of good papers which have the thesis "AI doesn't work," but there has not been a single good paper with the thesis "AI is bad and it doesn't work," because in every case the first is used as proof of the second.
November 18, 2025 at 5:18 PM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
"this computer program knows english" is weird. like, it's very weird. it was not true until recently. it seems OBVIOUSLY weird to me! i am convinced people are managing to ignore it for weird reasons
November 18, 2025 at 5:51 AM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
for relatively normal people (ie, we're not assigning reading here) i think the most convincing thing is to just talk to the thing? like, they know english. they just do. it's not close. you can trick them, they're weird, the personalities are ehhh, but they can carry a conversation.
November 18, 2025 at 5:51 AM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
the default left wing position is that it is simultaneously

1) repugnant that people want to own sentient slaves, but
2) laughable to imagine that they could, so not a real concern
This is true and ironic considering that “we might actually make a machine, which is owned by somebody, sentient” is actually an incredible moral argument against AI research
at this point i think a lot of people have negatively polarized themselves into cartesian dualism out of spite
November 18, 2025 at 3:07 AM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
i think this also underrates the way in which reinforcement learning + causal masking influences models towards the use of specific phrasal structures as, essentially, operators. eg., "it's not X--it's Y" is a way to suppress feature activation X in favor of feature activation Y.
November 17, 2025 at 5:33 PM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
i quit my job working on these things because i concluded i could not ethically continue, but the problem is that the space of criticism is dominated by people who believe that they are evil, useless, and cannot be improved, which ironically excludes almost every way in which they are harmful.
November 17, 2025 at 8:52 AM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
Very funny to compare this to the Valve hardware announcement video, and think back to the Amazon guy on LinkedIn who was like, “why can’t we compete with Valve??? It is a mystery!!!”
just saw the worst gaming ad ive ever seen
November 16, 2025 at 3:12 PM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
Folks, a famous author isn't ever going to contact you out of the blue to offer you literary services. It's always a scam. Also, speaking as an at least semifamous author, you wouldn't want any services we did offer, we're just barely handling our own shit, much less anyone else's.
I've now heard from 3 authors targeted on X by a scammer impersonating Lois McMaster Bujold. Bujold impersonator refers author to "Eleanor Wood at Spectrum Literary", also an impersonation. Goal: to sell editing svcs. Scam is impersonating multiple authors & agents writerbeware.blog/2025/11/14/i...
If a Famous Author Calls, Hang Up: Anatomy of an Impersonation Scam - Writer Beware
You open your email program one morning. The usual work stuff. Some spam (annoying that it got past your filters!). A couple of newsletters (maybe later). You sip your coffee, scroll down. Wait. What’...
writerbeware.blog
November 16, 2025 at 7:26 PM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
Doctor says, 'Dont worry, parser design is simple. Great programmer Kate Compton has written the parser you seek’
November 16, 2025 at 2:44 PM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
This feels like an ad written, directed *and* acted by people who have
1. Never played a game
2. Never watched anyone play a game
3. Never seen anyone interact with Alexa
4. Never seen anyone interact full stop
5. Never been alone in a room?
just saw the worst gaming ad ive ever seen
November 16, 2025 at 7:34 AM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
Never seen a mayor so committed to reversing the modest progress she's made on homelessness.
After failing to stop a major state housing bill from becoming law, Los Angeles leaders are turning to plan B: Delaying Senate Bill 79's implementation and pushing for unspecified legislative changes next year. My dispatch for @politico.com Pro subscribers subscriber.politicopro.com/article/2025...
POLITICO Pro: Los Angeles failed to defeat a major housing law, so it's turning to Plan B: Delay, delay, delay
A report from the city planning department outlines strategies for pushing off many of the effects of SB 79 through 2030.
subscriber.politicopro.com
November 16, 2025 at 12:20 AM
Reposted by Dave Kasten
poster's bushido logically implies the existence of historical european posting arts
November 14, 2025 at 7:32 PM