Sebastian Karcher
banner
adam42smith.bsky.social
Sebastian Karcher
@adam42smith.bsky.social

Director, Qualitative Data Repository (personal account).
Data, Zotero, Social Science Methods
https://sebastiankarcher.com

Political science 25%
Computer science 23%
The sale pitch for this AI Scientist "Kosmos" as presented in this Podcast just seems like a big HARKing exercise. Yes, just look at the data long enough and you'll find "something".

Has anybody made any experiences with AI scientists models? Recommendations?
pca.st/episode/58aa...
Where Is All the A.I.-Driven Scientific Progress?
pca.st
Funny Numbers

xkcd.com/3184/

Vegans hold all sorts of different views, but Vegans in the Singer/Animal Rights tradition think pretty much exactly that - they'd even use the term 'specieist'. Contra stereotype, the vast majority of them also understand that yelling at people who disagree is both obnoxious & counterproductive

Absolutely wild. It was crazy even before it got to the Boccelis...

If you look at the submitted/accepted dates, I think we can conclusively say this wasn't peer-reviewed, so the label is wrong.

Skocpol is a brilliant scholar & sharp political analyst who also suffers from 'kids these days' syndrome, including 'kids these days & their unions' npeu.org/news/2020/7/...

(Also, the though I can't find it anymore, kids these days & their sexual harassment concerns)

I think what it's supposed to be is lower Eastside but maybe some deep subconscious kept him from blaming NY Jews.
Alternatively, CBS producers are really into theater & have second apartments in London...

FWIW you can just cancel your Zotero subscription and keep everything on your computer

I was just remarking on the plethora of hip coffee shops and wine bars in Pine Falls (which also has a surprisingly large Jewish congregation bc we're watching Oy to the World)

Fascinating. I'm surprised this particular problem seems so hard to solve.

I don't think your initial 'improve your writing' framing works (as opposed to fleshing out rough notes as in the paper figure).
a) If you give AI fully crafted writing to improve, IME feedback rarely introduces new ideas
b) if it did, no reason you wouldn't notice it needed a citation

The journal doesn't seem to have a 'letter' or similar category, but presumably really wanted to publish it. Most generously, because they thought it was important, but hard to think it wasn't also because of the names involved & bc of what it'll do for their IF...

that should have been "less than two months". ugh.

This was published >2 months after initial submission as a "Research Article" in journal that claims articles are peer reviewed. I'm all for rapid turnaround, but this is hard to believe.
If they want to publish rapidly on important issues w/o peer review -- great, but should be labelled as such

Reposted by Sebastian Karcher

In one of the Danish TV screenings of Die Hard, “yippee-ki-yay, motherfucker” was changed to “yippee-ki-yay, bror lort,” which means “yippee-ki-yay, shit brother.” In a German screening, the “motherfucker” was changed to Schweinebacke (“pig cheek”). And in Finnish... pulunnussija (“pigeon fucker”).
Let’s air those grievances. I want to hear your pettiest gripes on this the holiest of days.
Now published…

We Reject the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Reflexive Qualitative Research - Tanisha Jowsey, Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke, Deborah Lupton, Michelle Fine, 2025

journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
We Reject the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Reflexive Qualitative Research - Tanisha Jowsey, Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke, Deborah Lupton, Michelle Fine, 2025
Four hundred and nineteen experienced qualitative researchers from 32 countries invite readers of Qualitative Inquiry to consider their position on use of gener...
journals.sagepub.com
I think we need a mega thread of everyone's craziest archive stories.

2/2 It does mean that you may make an invalid ILL request, which libraries already report is happening a lot :(.
I see how that's a hassle for libs & users, but this was never a good way to verify citations; that seems like something teachable (&obv a citr isn't actually verified until you see PDF)

What's happening is that the library discovery layer is displaying the output of an OpenURL request. It does the same, e.g., for Zotero's "Locate" function. That's extremely useful bc you can then a) either access the work via the library or b) make an ILL request 1/2

To be clear, though: you only get to that pseudo catalog page if you start on GScholar (and the functionality isn't GScholar specific). If you start in the library catalog, you don't see the cited 'work' existing ever

I see people are applying to be main character of Bsky like in the good ol days of yore.
I preferred this place without.

In the specific case of football, though, that confidence sounds very painful...

I had somehow never seen that graph -- that's incredibly effective
"Across the highest adult performance, peak performance is negatively correlated with early performance" Is uite literally what you'd see if coliderbias:

Just for the ratio/selection bias: I'm with you on this. The companies suck, some of the societal consequences large & small are v worrying, but the tech is amazing

Reposted by Sebastian Karcher

"Across the highest adult performance, peak performance is negatively correlated with early performance" Is uite literally what you'd see if coliderbias:

A-Index. 42 is quite the humble-brag, I have to say.
the epstein files as rick owens fall/winter 2024

The NYT very oddly vacillates between calling lies lies and weaseling around them. They absolutely know how to call out lies, e.g.:
(source: www.nytimes.com/2025/12/19/n... )

Looking for #polisky data -- I'm looking for a recent-ish paper with public survey data that has an English free text response to at least one Q that, ideally, is categorized and analyzed in the paper. (Background: I'd like to experiment w some classifiers, likely for teaching)
Any pointers/ideas?