such a travesty
banner
suchatravesty.bsky.social
such a travesty
@suchatravesty.bsky.social
Housing law nerd. Formerly: public interest lawyer. Currently: law adjacent. Master of sarcasm. Pup mom. Native Californian. Fuck ICE. All opinions my own, unfortunately.
Yesterday was… a lot. Sadness. Anger. Relief. Frustration. Yet, we push forward.
November 14, 2025 at 2:55 PM
Reposted by such a travesty
a “Space Force”, if you will
we need a department of kerning
November 13, 2025 at 2:27 PM
I have made emotional support brownies for the office tomorrow.
November 13, 2025 at 3:31 AM
At least we get some damning Epstein docs from the House Dems to lessen the sting of the Senate Dems’ capitulation.
November 12, 2025 at 2:18 PM
Harmeet Dhillon is an idiot. That is all.
November 12, 2025 at 5:24 AM
Share your #northernlights pics, Colorado & co!
November 12, 2025 at 5:10 AM
Reposted by such a travesty
if you want good federal government you need good federal government workers, and if you want good federal government workers you need to compete for them in the labor market.

apparently this is controversial now and i don't think it should be.
November 11, 2025 at 7:37 PM
Reposted by such a travesty
Hi, Jean. My friend is a Nigerian prince who needs to urgently retrieve $1,000,000 from an abandoned trust from his father.

If you can wire $5,000 today, you will be entitled to 35% of the trust. Please reply at your earliest convenience.
Shaheen: "We've heard from a number of our colleagues on the other side of the aisle that they're willing to come to the table, they're willing to work with us once the govt is open to get this done. We've heard the same thing from the White House. So now we'll see if they're really gonna work w/us"
November 11, 2025 at 2:33 AM
Reposted by such a travesty
Look at this new outrage. To open govt, we're retroactively letting 8 Senators sue for $500K each over having had their J6 phone toll records looked at. www.nytimes.com/2025/11/10/u...
Spending Bill Would Pave Way for Senators to Sue Over Phone Searches
www.nytimes.com
November 10, 2025 at 11:22 PM
Reposted by such a travesty
Buried inside the deal to reopen government is a provision that would give Senators private right of action to sue for millions in damages over their phone records being analyzed by Jack Smith's team.
news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/...
Shutdown Deal Would Let Senators Sue Over Jack Smith Searches
Senators whose phone records were sought by Special Counsel Jack Smith would gain authority to sue for millions in damages under a provision buried in the Senate-advanced deal to reopen the government...
news.bloomberglaw.com
November 10, 2025 at 8:20 PM
I hate this timeline.
November 10, 2025 at 4:05 PM
Reposted by such a travesty
Harm to SNAP recipients, federal workers, and others is real. In a normal democracy it’d make sense to prioritize reducing that harm in the short term.

In a rapidly backsliding democracy, harm is happening no matter what. Preventing authoritarian consolidation is the most harm-reducing move.
two contradictory ideas that i hold in my head at the same time: 1) i think the threat to both SNAP recipients and federal workers is significant enough now that even bad deals are worth making to prevent further harm, and, 2) everyone who caves now should retire in shame
November 10, 2025 at 2:54 AM
Reposted by such a travesty
Great job, @schumer.senate.gov. You've changed the story from "GOP hurting millions of Americans to please unpopular, failing, delusional despot who's destroying his party" to "Dems are too weak and divided in the face of Trump's strength to take a stand and protect Americans"
November 10, 2025 at 11:49 AM
The trauma inflicted on every federal employee RIFed in October and furloughed without pay was for nothing. Absolutely nothing.
November 10, 2025 at 3:18 AM
Reposted by such a travesty
This is not a deal, it’s a surrender to Trump. Senate Democrats should reject this plan that does nothing to prevent healthcare premiums from skyrocketing for millions of Americans. I’ll be a HELL NO in the House.
November 10, 2025 at 1:21 AM
Reposted by such a travesty
The original Dem demands were:
1) Permanent ACA subsidies
2) Medicaid funding restored
3) No more blank checks for the regime (rescission)

They dropped Medicaid immediately. Went silent on rescission. Cut back to 1 year of subsidies on Friday. And surrendered today.

The Senate Democrats!
November 10, 2025 at 2:29 AM
Reposted by such a travesty
Should be pretty clear that without House commitment on a vote on ACA extensions, it is purely symbolic as part of the Senate deal
Q: Will you assure House Democrats they'll get a vote on ACA subsidies by a date certain?

MIKE JOHNSON: Ah -- no. I'm not promising anyone anything.
November 10, 2025 at 1:37 AM
Reposted by such a travesty
This is really good to see: Miki Sherrill just put out a statement sharply criticizing the Senate Dems' pending cave in the government shutdown, ripping it as "malpractice" and a betrayal of the people who are "counting on us to fight for them." Sherrill knows what drove her victory. Wake up, Dems.
November 10, 2025 at 1:38 AM
Reposted by such a travesty
They should not have fucked over all of our federal employees and hurt so many people for literally nothing.
Shutting down the government is a big deal. People have been hurt in big ways as a result of the decision. To have that suffering be for nothing—to re-open the government without actually having protected people’s health insurance and economic well-being—is unconscionable.
November 10, 2025 at 12:28 AM
Reposted by such a travesty
Its peak "we can use this vote against them in an election" brain
Claiming that getting a vote destined to fail as a win is an insult to everyone’s intelligence
Here's the full text of the deal:
- House CR extended to January 30, no RIFs permitted until then
- Minibus
- Ds get a filibusterable ACA vote in December

Read the text:
hillheat.com/files/467/co...
November 10, 2025 at 12:10 AM
Reposted by such a travesty
Why has the government been closed at all if Senate Dems cave now? Didn't they say that they could not go along with throwing millions of people off health care?

What's materially changed? A *promise* is not action. ALSO fascists lie and I've been told by some Senate Dems that the GOP is fascist.
November 9, 2025 at 11:43 PM
Reposted by such a travesty
Have R senators? (Like me?) Call Schumer’s office to tell him you will never donate to another D senate campaign again as long as he’s Senate leader. Tell him this deal is a shameful joke and a betrayal.

(202) 224-6542
I just did this and if nothing else it was cathartic. I said I would make it my life’s mission to make sure there’s a primary challenger for any D involved in this deal, it’s fucking embarrassing.
So, listen, call Schumer’s office no matter where you live, no matter if you’re registered to vote. Leave a voicemail that says if Senate Dems cave without an ACA premiums fix, you will never vote for or donate to another Senate Democrat as long as he is Leader
November 9, 2025 at 11:34 PM
Sell outs
CNN, CBS, others report that at least 8 Dems have reached a deal to end the shutdown
November 10, 2025 at 12:03 AM
All of @schiff.senate.gov's voicemail boxes are full except for the one at the new Burbank office.
November 9, 2025 at 9:17 PM
If true, we will have to primary every single Senator who votes for this bullshit AND work to identify and primary every single Senator who supported this deal but got cover from the ones who took the vote.
“A promise of a vote on healthcare” is nothing
November 9, 2025 at 8:42 PM