It does not provide immunity for prior crimes.
It does not provide immunity to the President's cabinet.
Similar to Roe v. Wade, it can be overturned in the future.
It does not provide immunity for prior crimes.
It does not provide immunity to the President's cabinet.
Similar to Roe v. Wade, it can be overturned in the future.
They are the biggest idiots and hypocrites out there
They are the biggest idiots and hypocrites out there
And how clear it is when there are efforts to stop that journalism.
And how clear it is when there are efforts to stop that journalism.
It’s now ok to infiltrate a tv channel and pull whatever the administration dislikes and pull possible unfavorable stories.
But when another administration “asks” to have misinformation and stolen revenge porn taken down
That’s “censorship”?
It’s now ok to infiltrate a tv channel and pull whatever the administration dislikes and pull possible unfavorable stories.
But when another administration “asks” to have misinformation and stolen revenge porn taken down
That’s “censorship”?
What the experience as 'apologizing for being white' is actually just 'accommodating non-white people living as full citizens and equals.'
What the experience as 'apologizing for being white' is actually just 'accommodating non-white people living as full citizens and equals.'
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/21/b...
stories. Abandoning them now is a betrayal of the most basic tenet of journalism: giving voice to the voiceless.”
stories. Abandoning them now is a betrayal of the most basic tenet of journalism: giving voice to the voiceless.”
The reason is obvious — it gives the subject of your story a pocket veto.
The reason is obvious — it gives the subject of your story a pocket veto.