Peter Smith
@peterfsmith.bsky.social
Person. Envious of all the people who have much better profile descriptions than mine.
Reposted by Peter Smith
This is brilliant
November 3, 2025 at 4:44 AM
This is brilliant
Reposted by Peter Smith
this is literally never not accurate
November 10, 2025 at 6:32 PM
this is literally never not accurate
Reposted by Peter Smith
The easiest political layup for Democrats in recent memory. That’s even compared to a lot of other easy layups.
BREAKING: DOJ goes to SCOTUS trying to stop a district court order that USDA pay out full SNAP benefits this month.
The First Circuit denied an administrative stay, but has not yet ruled on the stay request. And, CNN reported that USDA is already processing payments.
DOJ went to SCOTUS anyway.
The First Circuit denied an administrative stay, but has not yet ruled on the stay request. And, CNN reported that USDA is already processing payments.
DOJ went to SCOTUS anyway.
November 8, 2025 at 12:02 AM
The easiest political layup for Democrats in recent memory. That’s even compared to a lot of other easy layups.
Reposted by Peter Smith
The Trump administration is now literally *fighting* to deny food to 42 million people, more than a third of them children.
Read that again.
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/06/u...
Read that again.
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/06/u...
November 7, 2025 at 2:21 AM
The Trump administration is now literally *fighting* to deny food to 42 million people, more than a third of them children.
Read that again.
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/06/u...
Read that again.
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/06/u...
Reposted by Peter Smith
Democrats he has just given you the easiest layup in the history of politics. He could've taken the off ramp political win with his base and blame the woke judge for forcing his hand but no he doubled down and appealed the ruling because HE WANTS PEOPLE TO STARVE.
Trump is fighting as hard as he can to starve kids for negotiating leverage.
November 6, 2025 at 11:32 PM
Democrats he has just given you the easiest layup in the history of politics. He could've taken the off ramp political win with his base and blame the woke judge for forcing his hand but no he doubled down and appealed the ruling because HE WANTS PEOPLE TO STARVE.
Reposted by Peter Smith
serious note: they're gonna try 5x harder to sabotage the midterms after tonight and we're gonna have to organize on a literally historic scale to stop them
really obvious now why trump and the republican party have been working so hard to prevent fair elections lol they know
November 5, 2025 at 4:41 AM
serious note: they're gonna try 5x harder to sabotage the midterms after tonight and we're gonna have to organize on a literally historic scale to stop them
Reposted by Peter Smith
its so weird how i havent seen a single op-ed thats like "intentionally starving americans could prove problematic for gop midterm chances"
November 4, 2025 at 6:11 PM
its so weird how i havent seen a single op-ed thats like "intentionally starving americans could prove problematic for gop midterm chances"
Reposted by Peter Smith
tired: great gatsby parties
wired: bastille day parties
wired: bastille day parties
Apparently there was a Gatsby party at Mar a Lago, while Trump is trying to kick 42 million off SNAP
November 1, 2025 at 5:49 PM
tired: great gatsby parties
wired: bastille day parties
wired: bastille day parties
Holy crap, they almost lost on a Bad News Bears play.
November 2, 2025 at 3:42 AM
Holy crap, they almost lost on a Bad News Bears play.
I repeat...
ROJAS!!!
November 2, 2025 at 3:38 AM
I repeat...
Reposted by Peter Smith
New York Times Op-Ed one year ago
November 1, 2025 at 1:25 AM
New York Times Op-Ed one year ago
Reposted by Peter Smith
Some context to the viral videos:
Around 9am Friday, ICE/CBP *encircled* several square miles of a safe suburb and *stormed* it using multiple units.
They were in cars, on foot in alleys & gangways, and in helicopters. They demanded papers, threatened residents, pointed guns, kidnapped people.
Around 9am Friday, ICE/CBP *encircled* several square miles of a safe suburb and *stormed* it using multiple units.
They were in cars, on foot in alleys & gangways, and in helicopters. They demanded papers, threatened residents, pointed guns, kidnapped people.
November 1, 2025 at 4:38 PM
Some context to the viral videos:
Around 9am Friday, ICE/CBP *encircled* several square miles of a safe suburb and *stormed* it using multiple units.
They were in cars, on foot in alleys & gangways, and in helicopters. They demanded papers, threatened residents, pointed guns, kidnapped people.
Around 9am Friday, ICE/CBP *encircled* several square miles of a safe suburb and *stormed* it using multiple units.
They were in cars, on foot in alleys & gangways, and in helicopters. They demanded papers, threatened residents, pointed guns, kidnapped people.
STOP INTERVIEWING THE MANAGER WHILE THE GAME IS ON
November 2, 2025 at 1:12 AM
STOP INTERVIEWING THE MANAGER WHILE THE GAME IS ON
Reposted by Peter Smith
in times like this we return to the ancient texts
October 30, 2025 at 6:45 PM
in times like this we return to the ancient texts
"Listen, we paid a small fortune for the right to play the first 30 seconds of 'Hot For Teacher'; we're gonna get our money's worth!"
-the sound guy at Dodger Stadium
-the sound guy at Dodger Stadium
October 30, 2025 at 2:48 AM
"Listen, we paid a small fortune for the right to play the first 30 seconds of 'Hot For Teacher'; we're gonna get our money's worth!"
-the sound guy at Dodger Stadium
-the sound guy at Dodger Stadium
Reposted by Peter Smith
"For decades, the Pentagon viewed the climate crisis as a national security threat – not for environmental reasons, but because it undermined operations and readiness.
Now the Trump administration is dismantling that approach."
Now the Trump administration is dismantling that approach."
Pentagon retreats from climate fight even as heat and storms slam US troops
For decades, the military treated the climate crisis as a threat. Now it’s backing away from plans to protect people and bases from extreme weather
www.theguardian.com
October 29, 2025 at 10:31 PM
"For decades, the Pentagon viewed the climate crisis as a national security threat – not for environmental reasons, but because it undermined operations and readiness.
Now the Trump administration is dismantling that approach."
Now the Trump administration is dismantling that approach."
Dodger Stadium organist playing "The Never Ending Story."
October 28, 2025 at 6:46 AM
Dodger Stadium organist playing "The Never Ending Story."
Reposted by Peter Smith
“They’ve got money for ICE and golden ballrooms but not for hungry families” is so easy it’s almost funny
Johnson: Snap benefits is a unique situation. I got a summary of the legal analysis…the contingency funds are not legally available to cover the benefits right now
October 27, 2025 at 4:41 PM
“They’ve got money for ICE and golden ballrooms but not for hungry families” is so easy it’s almost funny
Reposted by Peter Smith
Reposted by Peter Smith
It is baffling that Democrats didn't hold a press conference within sight of this destruction. It's a perfect visual metaphor.
Democrats gonna announce a press conference to demand the demolition process be halted
the conference will be scheduled for next wednesday
the conference will be scheduled for next wednesday
It looks like the East Wing is pretty much gone
October 23, 2025 at 3:20 PM
It is baffling that Democrats didn't hold a press conference within sight of this destruction. It's a perfect visual metaphor.
Reposted by Peter Smith
34 people killed in 50 days. Their guilt or innocence unknown, for an alleged crime that doesn't carry a death sentence. That's a lot of death.
adamisacson.com/boat-strikes/
adamisacson.com/boat-strikes/
October 22, 2025 at 7:42 PM
34 people killed in 50 days. Their guilt or innocence unknown, for an alleged crime that doesn't carry a death sentence. That's a lot of death.
adamisacson.com/boat-strikes/
adamisacson.com/boat-strikes/
Reposted by Peter Smith
Just remembering when Musk banned a ton of people (mostly journalists) for pointing out that he banned the ElonJet account, and he (and many of his vocal supporters) argued that merely mentioning the existence of ElonJet was doxxing and designed to harm Musk.
Seems like a bit of a double standard.
Seems like a bit of a double standard.
October 23, 2025 at 3:17 AM
Just remembering when Musk banned a ton of people (mostly journalists) for pointing out that he banned the ElonJet account, and he (and many of his vocal supporters) argued that merely mentioning the existence of ElonJet was doxxing and designed to harm Musk.
Seems like a bit of a double standard.
Seems like a bit of a double standard.
Reposted by Peter Smith
ok who did this? ☹️
October 22, 2025 at 9:52 PM
ok who did this? ☹️