MsTPole
mstpole.bsky.social
MsTPole
@mstpole.bsky.social
Polish woman in North London. Froths about attitudes to immigrants and general twatishness.
Reposted by MsTPole
One should be in no doubt that most of Britain's elites will simply make their peace with Farage and do a deal, so long as they get left alone or benefit. Tho there is resistance to Trump in the US, it's v much the exception.(1/2) www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/...
Cambridge University cosies up to Reform
The vice-chancellor expects Nigel Farage to model his policies on Trump and says other Russell Group members are meeting his allies
www.thetimes.com
November 30, 2025 at 9:59 AM
Reposted by MsTPole
Irish artist Mildred Anne Butler, Shades of Evening, 1904 #womensart #November
November 26, 2025 at 4:29 PM
Reposted by MsTPole
Another missed opportunity to make a principled argument that people who have lived here a significant period of time during which they have contributed in various ways should have certain rights. In many cases these people will be in long-term relationships with UK nationals with dependent children
Reform’s plan to cut EU citizens’ benefits would risk trade war with Europe, Labour claims – UK politics live
Reform’s plan to cut EU citizens’ benefits would risk trade war with Europe, Labour claims – UK politics live
As Reform announces what it claims are £25bn in savings through cuts, Labour says ‘Farage’s fantasy numbers don’t add up’ Good morning. Yesterday, as the government announced drastic plans to curb the number of asylum seekers able to stay in the UK, it was accused of adopting the politics of Reform UK, the anti-immigration party with a big lead in the opinion polls. In response, ministers argued that Labour would be doing even worse if it just ignored the legitimate concerns of voters who are supporting Nigel Farage’s party. But, when mainstream parties move on to the territory of the more extreme parties, they often respond with a further lurch to the right, and we will see an example of that today. Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, is holding a press conference where he is going to announce proposals that cover immigration and the budget (the other huge announcement preoccupying Westminster politics at the moment). As Peter Walker reports, Farage will propose spending cuts which he clams would save £25bn a year. The virtual elimination of all foreign aid spending. Currently aid spending runs at almost £14bn a year, but Reform would slash this to £1bn. Removing the right of EU nationals living in the UK to claim benefits, which Reform UK says would save £6bn. Increasing the cost of the NHS surcharge, the fee paid by non-UK residents when they get a visa to stay in the UK. This would rise form £1,035 to £2,718 a year, which Reform UK says would save £5bn. Nigel Farage’s fantasy numbers don’t add up, and he’d leave British taxpayers footing a hefty bill. Farage is happy to slap British shoppers with higher prices at the checkouts by risking a trade war with Europe. He’d betray working people and hammer British businesses who want to trade with the EU. Continue reading...
www.theguardian.com
November 18, 2025 at 9:11 AM
Reposted by MsTPole
In September, Reform said they would make welfare limited to UK citizens only. Then told journalists that would not apply to EU nationals with settled status, protected by the UK-EU withdrawal treaty, then said they could "negotiate" on that with the EU.

Now say they are reneging on the treaty
November 18, 2025 at 12:16 AM
Reposted by MsTPole
This is the fearless journalism Britannia deserves.
November 5, 2025 at 12:20 PM
Reposted by MsTPole
The Tories want me deported for going on maternity.
Here Lam explicitly sets out her proposal - which is official Conservative Party policy - to deport long-standing legal permanent residents who have *ever* claimed any benefit, including the state pension or child benefit (even if the child is British), or who earn less than £39K.
October 22, 2025 at 8:18 AM
Reposted by MsTPole
This is all horrifyingly cruel but condition 3 is staggeringly awful: “if P OR dependents of P have been in receipt of social protection”

So just if a *dependent* of someone with ILR gets any sort of welfare benefit whatsoever the original person can have their ILR revoked? This is insanely evil.
The Conservatives have drafted the legislation.

ANY one of the conditions being met leads to ILR being revoked.

If annual income falls below £38,700 for six months (for any reason at all)

The Secretary of State would also have the powers add whatever further conditions they want.
October 21, 2025 at 9:42 PM
Reposted by MsTPole
The draft legislation is crackers. It would fail immediately if we stayed in the ECHR but it disappears the human rights act. if passed after that it would involve mandatory loss of ILR for up to 400,000 people + refusal of 2-3 million others, though without no credible means to identify or remove
Here Lam explicitly sets out her proposal - which is official Conservative Party policy - to deport long-standing legal permanent residents who have *ever* claimed any benefit, including the state pension or child benefit (even if the child is British), or who earn less than £39K.
October 22, 2025 at 5:17 AM
So the main group they’re targeting for deportation appears to be mothers of children who are now presumably British.
Here Lam explicitly sets out her proposal - which is official Conservative Party policy - to deport long-standing legal permanent residents who have *ever* claimed any benefit, including the state pension or child benefit (even if the child is British), or who earn less than £39K.
October 22, 2025 at 5:41 AM
Reposted by MsTPole
Tory policy is to revoke permanent residence (ILR) for everybody who does not earn £38k - deporting most nurses who have ILR

This is put in the video as "who is unlikely to contribute more than they cost"

NB: video does not say EU settled status is exempt

No govt since Idi Amin has done this
October 21, 2025 at 8:53 PM
Reposted by MsTPole
Indeed. One of the consequences is that MPs and journalists who still consider themselves centre-right now discuss unilaterally revoking settlement rights and deporting people on a mass scale as if this a normal policy option like tax cuts or bus spending.
A lot that could be said about this but if you look on Twitter it’s noticeable that the replies and quote tweets are *overwhelmingly* telling him he shouldn’t have apologised and even attacking him for doing so. That’s the feedback loop certain users are plugged into now, and it has consequences.
October 20, 2025 at 8:08 AM
Reposted by MsTPole
“Mood music changing” captures this perfectly. And people might not realise quite how concerning this is for people living here with such immigration status. Suddenly it feels like things are up for discussion that weren’t, and mainstream politics is just going along with it
I genuinely find this very worrying, as someone with settled status! sure, Lam probably won't be home secretary tomorrow, but the mood music is changing, you can feel it, and I just don't trust Labour to fight like hell on our behalf, so unclear where this is going to go
Lam hears "settled status" and "guaranteed by withdrawal treaty" as up for grabs:understood to be temporary "provisional arrangements" which can be transitional and unsettled if and when you want to

That is highly counterintuitive as language of 'settled', as law & as politics of Treaty guarantees.
October 19, 2025 at 9:22 AM
Reposted by MsTPole
Apropos of nothing, I really do think UK journalists and politicians need some reminding that mass deportation of LEGAL immigrants, particularly those with permanent status, is far more extreme than even Trump's America and would basically place Britain completely on its own among democracies.
October 19, 2025 at 11:32 AM
Reposted by MsTPole
Sunday Times interview Tory "rising star" Katie Lam

She is clear she wants lots of legal migrants to be told to "go home" so as "to leave a mostly but not entirely culturally coherent group of people"

(The interviewer suggests she is scrapping ILR or stripping people of it)
October 18, 2025 at 10:53 PM
Reposted by MsTPole
You’ve lived in Britain for decades, paying into NI and a state pension the whole time, then the govt says it’s seizing your pension and if you don’t like it, you can abandon your family and return to a country you haven’t lived in for 30 years
The Tory Party has gone mad..
October 6, 2025 at 3:26 PM
Reposted by MsTPole
I know people keep saying how far the next election is but I don’t see how anyone can look at this and not be terrified. Also showing their privilege. Easy to say if you and your loved ones are British citizens who aren’t facing deportation from the country they might have lived in for decades.
📊 Ref lead of 10pts
Westminster voting intention

REF: 31% (-1)
LAB: 21% (-1)
CON: 19% (+1)
LDEM: 13% (+1)
GRN: 9% (+3)

via @JLPartnersPolls, 26 Sep - 03 Oct
Chgs. w/ 31 Aug
britainelects.com
Britain Elects | Substack
Cutting through the noise with Ben Walker. Click to read Britain Elects, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers.
britainelects.com
October 6, 2025 at 12:38 PM
Reposted by MsTPole
The Opposition and the party that’s leading in the polls literally have policies more extreme than the BNP 20 years ago
David is slightly unfair. There is a clear difference here.

Conservatives and Reform plan to forcibly expel large numbers of people who are legal, permanent residents of migrant origin. The BNP proposal is voluntary.
This below is from the 2005 BNP manifesto.

Spot the difference with current Tory and Reform policy.

(p14 news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp... )
October 6, 2025 at 4:57 PM
and Ferrari just sits there and nods
lbc.co.uk LBC @lbc.co.uk · Sep 24
"They're eating the carp. They're eating the swans."

Nigel Farage doubles down on his bet that immigrants were eating cats and dogs in America.

He now suggests there's a 'similar story' in Britain.
September 24, 2025 at 1:23 PM
Reposted by MsTPole
Reminder that the base Brexit was built on was incitement to hate Central and Eastern Europeans before broadening out.
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/poli...
Farage falsely accuses eastern European migrants of eating swans from London parks
The Royal Parks charity quickly clarified that there was ‘no evidence’ of swans being killed and eaten
www.independent.co.uk
September 24, 2025 at 12:20 PM
Reposted by MsTPole
This is so obviously correct and was the case in 2017 when settled status was something to apply for rather than register, a weird fact that signalled the direction of travel - people legally living in the UK had *to reapply*.
It was obvious when EU citizens had the terms of their settlement here retrospectively revoked that a precedent was being set and that, in time, the argument would move on to other categories of migrant, always tending towards a purity test of who is ‘indigenous’. Unless resisted.
September 22, 2025 at 9:22 AM
Reposted by MsTPole
It was obvious when EU citizens had the terms of their settlement here retrospectively revoked that a precedent was being set and that, in time, the argument would move on to other categories of migrant, always tending towards a purity test of who is ‘indigenous’. Unless resisted.
September 22, 2025 at 9:17 AM