But they do show something useful in the level of dissatisfaction with existing options given a 'clean'* alternative.
(It's also FON, so caveat emptor)
RFM: 25%
GRN: 20%
LAB: 15%
CON: 13%
RES: 10%
LDM: 10%
Via @findoutnow.bsky.social, 14 Feb.
But they do show something useful in the level of dissatisfaction with existing options given a 'clean'* alternative.
(It's also FON, so caveat emptor)
It's really mainstream vs populists. That's a question for the public but also for challenger parties - into which category the Tories have now fallen too.
It's really mainstream vs populists. That's a question for the public but also for challenger parties - into which category the Tories have now fallen too.
Yesterday we found notarised incorporation documents for the Brazilian company, with Mr Mandelson's signature.
Sprouting Putin's lines vertabin
Sprouting Putin's lines vertabin
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
But it'd only take changes of fractions to produce a Ref+Con majority. Presumably the Tories put Reform in, given a Plaid/Lab/LD(?)/Grn(?) alternative but very unpleasant call for them.
But it'd only take changes of fractions to produce a Ref+Con majority. Presumably the Tories put Reform in, given a Plaid/Lab/LD(?)/Grn(?) alternative but very unpleasant call for them.
I'll never not be of the view that test cricket is the best form of the game and its highest challenge but T20s do give lesser teams their chances on the day if they can put it together. As Zim did. Credit to them.
I'll never not be of the view that test cricket is the best form of the game and its highest challenge but T20s do give lesser teams their chances on the day if they can put it together. As Zim did. Credit to them.
www.gambling.com/uk/news/uk-g...
www.gambling.com/uk/news/uk-g...
Muskite levels of lack of awareness, entitlement and unpleasantness.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cd...
Muskite levels of lack of awareness, entitlement and unpleasantness.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cd...
Short version: probably only Misconduct in Public Office.
We’ve discussed the law and the evidence with leading lawyers. The bottom line: "misconduct in public office" is the only viable route.
The law is messy and proving intent is hard - but we believe there is a realistic prospect of conviction.
🧵:
Short version: probably only Misconduct in Public Office.
In Britain there should be no such doubt.
In Britain there should be no such doubt.
It'll be interesting to see how many candidates they stand in May, and how they get on.
"Your Party Leadership Vote to Open as Corbyn-Sultana Battle Reaches Climax"
"Corbyn and Sultana teams neck and neck after ‘endorsements’ stage, in which over 11,000 members took part"
It'll be interesting to see how many candidates they stand in May, and how they get on.
Maybe Romeo is very good despite the Home Office's eternal problems but if Starmer is looking for someone to get govt policy delivery out of a rut, the Home Office is an odd place to look.
She would be the first ever female to lead the Civil Service
[@thetimes]
Maybe Romeo is very good despite the Home Office's eternal problems but if Starmer is looking for someone to get govt policy delivery out of a rut, the Home Office is an odd place to look.
Feels like Starmer is saying everyone else is to blame.
Complete No 10 clearout.
Feels like Starmer is saying everyone else is to blame.
That isn’t neutrality; it’s abdication.
@euosce.bsky.social #Ukraine
That isn’t neutrality; it’s abdication.
@euosce.bsky.social #Ukraine
"Burghart said Palantir’s MoD contract “was granted by direct award”, without competition, and asked the cabinet secretary to check there were “no other such contracts, no other such undisclosed meetings”." apple.news/AV4gdfVtNSFi...
"Burghart said Palantir’s MoD contract “was granted by direct award”, without competition, and asked the cabinet secretary to check there were “no other such contracts, no other such undisclosed meetings”." apple.news/AV4gdfVtNSFi...
I can't see the Labour electorate giving much leeway on the question.
I can't see the Labour electorate giving much leeway on the question.
*Labour* has an up-to-five-year mandate (off one-third of the votes!). Keir Starmer does not. If Starmer cannot retain the confidence of his MPs or party then someone else should take over.
*Labour* has an up-to-five-year mandate (off one-third of the votes!). Keir Starmer does not. If Starmer cannot retain the confidence of his MPs or party then someone else should take over.
Were Burnham the candidate in Denton & Gorton, we'd be in a false truce while Starmer critics waited for that election result (though McSweeney still goes).
trib.al/Jh0qibA
Were Burnham the candidate in Denton & Gorton, we'd be in a false truce while Starmer critics waited for that election result (though McSweeney still goes).
No cabinet resignations yet (nor on-the-record criticism from MPs) but mounting pressure must find a release.
In theory, Starmer could just sit pat and challenge others to come at him. In reality, No 10 is devoid of energy and that's deadly.
No cabinet resignations yet (nor on-the-record criticism from MPs) but mounting pressure must find a release.
In theory, Starmer could just sit pat and challenge others to come at him. In reality, No 10 is devoid of energy and that's deadly.
It will not end well when greater media and public scrutiny comes.
It will not end well when greater media and public scrutiny comes.