Now’s the time to start debating the reforms needed to prevent future presidential abuses like Trump’s.

Before he was killed, Jamal Khashoggi described the dark side of Saudi Arabia’s push to modernize.

YouTube video by Town Crier Network

YouTube video by Cancel Me, Daddy

The audio feed from the event was cut and reporters were told to leave

"I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately,” Bannon said on Thursday

In an article published in the Washington Post Thursday, political commentator Karen Tumulty called attention to one particular section of President Donald Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" "that "creates an end run around the federal courts for the Trump White House." "To find one of the most dangerous efforts by President Donald Trump and Republican leaders in Congress to trample the power of judges who stand in their way, you have to dig more than 500 pages into what they have christened, without embarrassment, the One Big Beautiful Bill," she wrote. "Just 57 words long, the egregious language is buried in a section titled 'Restriction on Enforcement.' It says no court 'may enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order' unless the party bringing the case has posted a monetary bond, which rarely happens in legal actions brought against the government," Tumulty noted. READ MORE: ‘He will be finished’: George Clooney predicts the end of Trump She continued: "Translated from legalese, it would mean federal judges would lose their most potent punishment — penalties that can include steep fines and even prison time — for those who refuse to follow their orders." She noted that, up to this point, no judge has imposed a contempt order. However, as legal cases progress, officials who persist in disregarding court rulings may soon face such orders — though this wouldn't apply to Trump himself due to presidential immunity. Tumulty further said the proposed legislation before Congress seeks to apply restrictions on contempt citations retroactively, potentially affecting cases where judges have already ruled against the administration's actions. The piece quoted Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison (D), who told The Post: “If a court cannot enforce its order, then its order becomes advisory, which in the eyes of the Trump administration, says it means nothing at all." READ MORE: 'Who is running the show?': Trump's sudden disappearance from public view sparks questions “It’s another sign that this president and this party do not believe in constitutional norms. They’re just done with democracy," Ellison added.