Leonardo
@leoq.bsky.social
It’s me, hi, I’m the problem it’s me.
Reposted by Leonardo
I knew Trump would target Minnesota. I didn’t expect this level of violence | Rachel Leingang
I knew Trump would target Minnesota. I didn’t expect this level of violence | Rachel Leingang
I’m reporting on a political retribution campaign, disguised as immigration enforcement, in the community where I live
www.theguardian.com
February 4, 2026 at 11:37 AM
I knew Trump would target Minnesota. I didn’t expect this level of violence | Rachel Leingang
Reposted by Leonardo
my dude gotta be profoundly rethinking his answer to the "would you rather fight one horse sized duck or 100 duck sized horses?" hypothetical rn
MAGA Adult Male assaults Texas High School students protesting ICE
February 3, 2026 at 5:23 PM
my dude gotta be profoundly rethinking his answer to the "would you rather fight one horse sized duck or 100 duck sized horses?" hypothetical rn
Reposted by Leonardo
*SPACEX, XAI VALUED AT $1.25 TRILLION: COMPANY MEMO
we are so close to the end you can smell it
we are so close to the end you can smell it
February 2, 2026 at 9:13 PM
*SPACEX, XAI VALUED AT $1.25 TRILLION: COMPANY MEMO
we are so close to the end you can smell it
we are so close to the end you can smell it
Reposted by Leonardo
This whole heap is gonna go public soon. So he made twitter investors whole with AI venture money and soon he’ll make the AI investors whole with public equity market money, on the back of an enterprise the US government won’t allow to fail.
A memo just went out to employees at two of Musk's companies: SpaceX has acquired xAI.
February 2, 2026 at 9:46 PM
This whole heap is gonna go public soon. So he made twitter investors whole with AI venture money and soon he’ll make the AI investors whole with public equity market money, on the back of an enterprise the US government won’t allow to fail.
Reposted by Leonardo
Today is the third time Elon Musk has bought Twitter in four years.
February 3, 2026 at 12:47 AM
Today is the third time Elon Musk has bought Twitter in four years.
Reposted by Leonardo
Los del PPSO de verdad dijeron "viva Rodrigo Chaves, viva Pilar Cisneros" antes de "Viva Laura Fernández" y eso dice todo.
February 2, 2026 at 4:40 AM
Los del PPSO de verdad dijeron "viva Rodrigo Chaves, viva Pilar Cisneros" antes de "Viva Laura Fernández" y eso dice todo.
Reposted by Leonardo
¿Es el PAC un partido provincial?
Discutan en grupos de 3.
Discutan en grupos de 3.
February 2, 2026 at 3:55 AM
¿Es el PAC un partido provincial?
Discutan en grupos de 3.
Discutan en grupos de 3.
¿Será buen momento para que empecemos a hablar de “tripartidismo”?
1. El PPSO consolida apoyo que antes iba al PUSC y a los partidos “liberales”, junto con el voto fundamentalista religioso.
2. El PLN mantiene el centro.
3. El FA se termina de comer al PAC y se consolida como partido de izquierda.
1. El PPSO consolida apoyo que antes iba al PUSC y a los partidos “liberales”, junto con el voto fundamentalista religioso.
2. El PLN mantiene el centro.
3. El FA se termina de comer al PAC y se consolida como partido de izquierda.
Los dos partidos que se aliaron con el partido de gobierno prácticamente han desaparecido de la Asamblea.
February 2, 2026 at 4:30 AM
¿Será buen momento para que empecemos a hablar de “tripartidismo”?
1. El PPSO consolida apoyo que antes iba al PUSC y a los partidos “liberales”, junto con el voto fundamentalista religioso.
2. El PLN mantiene el centro.
3. El FA se termina de comer al PAC y se consolida como partido de izquierda.
1. El PPSO consolida apoyo que antes iba al PUSC y a los partidos “liberales”, junto con el voto fundamentalista religioso.
2. El PLN mantiene el centro.
3. El FA se termina de comer al PAC y se consolida como partido de izquierda.
Reposted by Leonardo
Les que votaron por Laura Fernandez son les que normalmente estan en las juntas de salud y eduacion, en las asociaciones de desarrollo, en los comites cantonales, etc. Aunque soy anarquista yo se que no voy a logra convencerles de los meritos del anarquismo, asi que les recomiendo involucrarse en
February 2, 2026 at 3:54 AM
Les que votaron por Laura Fernandez son les que normalmente estan en las juntas de salud y eduacion, en las asociaciones de desarrollo, en los comites cantonales, etc. Aunque soy anarquista yo se que no voy a logra convencerles de los meritos del anarquismo, asi que les recomiendo involucrarse en
Ya con ese necesita como un 27% (ya hice el Excel jaja). A menos de que la participación aumente un montón eso ya está listo.
February 2, 2026 at 3:49 AM
Ya con ese necesita como un 27% (ya hice el Excel jaja). A menos de que la participación aumente un montón eso ya está listo.
Y sigue otro corte, pero mejor hago un Excel entonces 😅
February 2, 2026 at 3:42 AM
Y sigue otro corte, pero mejor hago un Excel entonces 😅
Aquí está:
Con 68,51% de participación, el voto total es de 2.534.870 y el umbral de 40% es de ~1 millón de votos.
Quedan 1,2 millones de votos por contar. Al PPSO le faltan como 400 mil. Eso es un 31,54% del resto.
Con 68,51% de participación, el voto total es de 2.534.870 y el umbral de 40% es de ~1 millón de votos.
Quedan 1,2 millones de votos por contar. Al PPSO le faltan como 400 mil. Eso es un 31,54% del resto.
February 2, 2026 at 3:41 AM
Aquí está:
Con 68,51% de participación, el voto total es de 2.534.870 y el umbral de 40% es de ~1 millón de votos.
Quedan 1,2 millones de votos por contar. Al PPSO le faltan como 400 mil. Eso es un 31,54% del resto.
Con 68,51% de participación, el voto total es de 2.534.870 y el umbral de 40% es de ~1 millón de votos.
Quedan 1,2 millones de votos por contar. Al PPSO le faltan como 400 mil. Eso es un 31,54% del resto.
Y justo cuando termino de poner los números del primer corte salió el segundo. Y ya con ese necesita menos.
Solo le faltan como 300 o 400 mil votos para el umbral.
Solo le faltan como 300 o 400 mil votos para el umbral.
February 2, 2026 at 3:36 AM
Y justo cuando termino de poner los números del primer corte salió el segundo. Y ya con ese necesita menos.
Solo le faltan como 300 o 400 mil votos para el umbral.
Solo le faltan como 300 o 400 mil votos para el umbral.
Necesita un 31%. Acá está la mate:
3,7 millones total
= ~ 2,4 millones de votos emitidos
= ~ 960.000 votos para el 40%
El PPSO tiene 326.733, por lo que le faltan ~633.267 votos para llegar al umbral.
Faltan 2 millones de votos por contar. Esos 633.267 son aproximadamente un 31%.
3,7 millones total
= ~ 2,4 millones de votos emitidos
= ~ 960.000 votos para el 40%
El PPSO tiene 326.733, por lo que le faltan ~633.267 votos para llegar al umbral.
Faltan 2 millones de votos por contar. Esos 633.267 son aproximadamente un 31%.
February 2, 2026 at 3:34 AM
Necesita un 31%. Acá está la mate:
3,7 millones total
= ~ 2,4 millones de votos emitidos
= ~ 960.000 votos para el 40%
El PPSO tiene 326.733, por lo que le faltan ~633.267 votos para llegar al umbral.
Faltan 2 millones de votos por contar. Esos 633.267 son aproximadamente un 31%.
3,7 millones total
= ~ 2,4 millones de votos emitidos
= ~ 960.000 votos para el 40%
El PPSO tiene 326.733, por lo que le faltan ~633.267 votos para llegar al umbral.
Faltan 2 millones de votos por contar. Esos 633.267 son aproximadamente un 31%.
En este corte veo un porcentaje de juntas procesadas en cantones rurales como del doble (o triple en algunos casos) que en cantones urbanos.
Haciendo mate rápida, y manteniendo el abstencionismo constante, creo que el PPSO necesita ganar por un ~31% en la GAM para quedar en primera ronda.
Haciendo mate rápida, y manteniendo el abstencionismo constante, creo que el PPSO necesita ganar por un ~31% en la GAM para quedar en primera ronda.
February 2, 2026 at 3:30 AM
En este corte veo un porcentaje de juntas procesadas en cantones rurales como del doble (o triple en algunos casos) que en cantones urbanos.
Haciendo mate rápida, y manteniendo el abstencionismo constante, creo que el PPSO necesita ganar por un ~31% en la GAM para quedar en primera ronda.
Haciendo mate rápida, y manteniendo el abstencionismo constante, creo que el PPSO necesita ganar por un ~31% en la GAM para quedar en primera ronda.
No me extrañaría que también estén esperando a que cierren las juntas en Los Angeles.
February 2, 2026 at 2:58 AM
No me extrañaría que también estén esperando a que cierren las juntas en Los Angeles.
Reposted by Leonardo
Abolish ICE and fire all agents is the moderate position.
I just got tear gassed along with thousands of union members, many of whom had their families with them. Federal agents at the ICE facility tear gassed children. We must abolish ICE, DHS, and we must have prosecutions. I expect to see enforcement of our city code prohibiting the use of tear gas.
February 1, 2026 at 2:27 AM
Abolish ICE and fire all agents is the moderate position.
Reposted by Leonardo
Getting the impression that ICE is gearing up for a pogrom in Springfield, Ohio, which was ground zero of Vance’s lies about Haitians during the campaign. Haitians lose temporary protected status on February 3rd. Reporters, lawyers, neighbors — please get ready.
January 31, 2026 at 8:03 PM
Getting the impression that ICE is gearing up for a pogrom in Springfield, Ohio, which was ground zero of Vance’s lies about Haitians during the campaign. Haitians lose temporary protected status on February 3rd. Reporters, lawyers, neighbors — please get ready.
Reposted by Leonardo
The people who are saying shit like "well it's either this or the borders are totally open" are doing their best to convince America that we should have completely open borders.
February 1, 2026 at 12:19 AM
The people who are saying shit like "well it's either this or the borders are totally open" are doing their best to convince America that we should have completely open borders.
Reposted by Leonardo
Holy fuck it’s still January.
February 1, 2026 at 12:55 AM
Holy fuck it’s still January.
Reposted by Leonardo
This is just insane. It’s only a matter of time before DHS kills another innocent person here.
(clip via MPR and @davidjbier.bsky.social on X)
(clip via MPR and @davidjbier.bsky.social on X)
January 31, 2026 at 6:13 PM
This is just insane. It’s only a matter of time before DHS kills another innocent person here.
(clip via MPR and @davidjbier.bsky.social on X)
(clip via MPR and @davidjbier.bsky.social on X)
Reposted by Leonardo
"If an agency wants to cosplay as a military force, it deserves to be evaluated as one,"
WIRED asked an active military officer to evaluate ICE's actions. Their analysis is not good...
www.wired.com/story/ice-pr...
WIRED asked an active military officer to evaluate ICE's actions. Their analysis is not good...
www.wired.com/story/ice-pr...
ICE Pretends It’s a Military Force. Its Tactics Would Get Real Soldiers Killed
WIRED asked an active military officer to break down immigration enforcement actions in Minneapolis and elsewhere.
www.wired.com
January 29, 2026 at 10:04 PM
"If an agency wants to cosplay as a military force, it deserves to be evaluated as one,"
WIRED asked an active military officer to evaluate ICE's actions. Their analysis is not good...
www.wired.com/story/ice-pr...
WIRED asked an active military officer to evaluate ICE's actions. Their analysis is not good...
www.wired.com/story/ice-pr...
Reposted by Leonardo
we've got Schumer calling for Miller's head, folks
we're dragging them kicking and screaming in the right direction, keep it up
we're dragging them kicking and screaming in the right direction, keep it up
Schumer calls for Kristi Noem and Stephen Miller to be removed from their jobs.
January 28, 2026 at 7:26 PM
we've got Schumer calling for Miller's head, folks
we're dragging them kicking and screaming in the right direction, keep it up
we're dragging them kicking and screaming in the right direction, keep it up
Reposted by Leonardo
There are people with principled takes on the 2nd Amendment, like the 1st.
But if you ever believed that the American Right broadly supported 2nd Amendment rights, as opposed to rights for people who agreed with them, you are a fool.
But if you ever believed that the American Right broadly supported 2nd Amendment rights, as opposed to rights for people who agreed with them, you are a fool.
Trump: "With that being said, you can't have guns. You can't walk in with guns. You just can't. You can't walk in with guns. You can't do that. But it's just a very unfortunate incident."
January 27, 2026 at 8:34 PM
There are people with principled takes on the 2nd Amendment, like the 1st.
But if you ever believed that the American Right broadly supported 2nd Amendment rights, as opposed to rights for people who agreed with them, you are a fool.
But if you ever believed that the American Right broadly supported 2nd Amendment rights, as opposed to rights for people who agreed with them, you are a fool.