Amy
amylibrarian.bsky.social
Amy
@amylibrarian.bsky.social
Lynx fan account 💙💚
Pinned
New pic is my elderly dog trying to help me with with a puzzle 🧩. So helpful
Me 6 months ago: I don't get why ppl would watch other ppl play video games.
Me since #WNBA All-Star weekend: I will tune in to #studbudz taking a disco nap
November 11, 2025 at 12:35 AM
BRB writing an obit for my librarian nemesis
A Sharon Begley byline, almost 5 years after her death.

Upon hearing the news James Watson had died, a STAT reporter said in our Slack, "I wish I could read what Sharon would have written."

Incredible news: Sharon in fact did pre-write a Watson obit. And it is masterful and excoriating.
🧪🧬🧫
James Watson, dead at 97, was a scientific legend and a pariah among his peers
James Watson, the co-discoverer of the structure of DNA who died Thursday at 97, was a scientific legend and a pariah among his peers.
www.statnews.com
November 9, 2025 at 9:34 PM
Reposted by Amy
1/ The US Government has quietly removed a memorial to Black soldiers who died in World War II from the Netherlands American Cemetery in Margraten, South Limburg. The move follows a complaint from the right-wing Heritage Foundation to the American Battle Monuments Commission. ⬇️
November 9, 2025 at 9:23 AM
Reposted by Amy
40 years ago we’d have congressional hearings falsely accusing metal bands of putting backwards messages in their songs that told kids to kill themselves & now we have a planet-killing chatbot that’s all like “bet you won’t commit suicide chickenshit bitch” & the government is like here’s $5 billion
November 8, 2025 at 4:23 AM
Psst Dakota County Library, we'd like a Craig Kilborn (Hastings) card 😂
November 8, 2025 at 3:18 AM
Reposted by Amy
🚨🚨🚨
November 7, 2025 at 8:11 PM
I watched about 5 minutes of the Wild game but had to turn it off after hearing Katie Storm's voice and then hearing a guy say that the Wild play in Minneapolis 😑
November 8, 2025 at 2:56 AM
This chartreuse court is a choice. #wolves #nba
November 8, 2025 at 2:53 AM
I have so much second-hand embarrassment 🥴
Um, @variety.com?

That’s…not what that means. 😳 variety.com/2025/music/n...
November 8, 2025 at 2:45 AM
Reposted by Amy
A List of Things Said to Have Been Ruined by Women

🧵
November 6, 2025 at 8:43 PM
Glad I watched this. My research and basketball worlds collided.
A presentation & then interview with @katestarbird.bsky.social. A Spotlight on Rumors www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjiGbgRAhJo #WNBA
A Spotlight on Rumors
YouTube video by UW (University of Washington)
www.youtube.com
November 6, 2025 at 5:28 PM
This is giving 'received a label maker' from Santa energy. Ask me how I know
New sign outside the Oval Office..
November 5, 2025 at 3:59 PM
This speech is 🔥
November 5, 2025 at 4:41 AM
I wonder if Jon Stewart should have waited to sign a (better) deal.
November 5, 2025 at 3:03 AM
Reposted by Amy
I especially love the section on reviewing conceptual works: "When literature is the primary source of data, it is particularly important to discuss the quality and relevance of literature that is introduced."
November 3, 2025 at 6:13 PM
Reposted by Amy
So happy to see this second guest editorial in C&RL this month calling for training & better peer review guidelines. crl.acrl.org/index.php/cr...
Improving Peer Reviewer Guidelines at C&RL | Schultz | College & Research Libraries
Improving Peer Reviewer Guidelines at C&RL
crl.acrl.org
November 3, 2025 at 6:12 PM
Reposted by Amy
"The author guidelines as currently written do not require or even inspire authors to be in accordance with the organization’s own information literacy standards"

crl.acrl.org/index.php/cr...
Seeking More Rigorous Author Guidelines at C&RL | Riegelman | College & Research Libraries
Seeking More Rigorous Author Guidelines at C&RL
crl.acrl.org
November 3, 2025 at 6:58 PM
Reposted by Amy
In which @amylibrarian.bsky.social and I argue that if LIS journals had more rigorous guidelines for authors, things like that ridiculous "privacy of thought" article in C&RL wouldn't get published. crl.acrl.org/index.php/cr...
Seeking More Rigorous Author Guidelines at C&RL | Riegelman | College & Research Libraries
Seeking More Rigorous Author Guidelines at C&RL
crl.acrl.org
November 3, 2025 at 2:59 PM
Reposted by Amy
How can we as academic librarians expect to be taken seriously as evidence synthesis/review experts when we don't apply appropriately rigorous methodology & reporting standards in our own journals?
November 3, 2025 at 3:03 PM
Reposting for the Monday crowd
November 3, 2025 at 2:57 PM
Reposted by Amy
“authors should state when they did not synthesize the totality of the evidence (e.g., engaged in cherry-picking) or if they did not evaluate or contextualize the included literature, etc.” Love peer review of the peer review! 🔥
November 3, 2025 at 2:08 AM
Reposted by Amy
This is such an awesome mic drop. Also, as someone trained in qualitative methods, it’s stunning to me for any journal to not include some sort of limitations section. No single study can be extrapolated to all situations on its own (nor any analysis).
November 2, 2025 at 4:49 PM
New (dare I say spicy?) Guest Editorial just dropped. Co-written with @meganmk.bsky.social

crl.acrl.org/index.php/cr...

🌶🌶🌶
Seeking More Rigorous Author Guidelines at C&RL | Riegelman | College & Research Libraries
Seeking More Rigorous Author Guidelines at C&RL
crl.acrl.org
November 2, 2025 at 2:42 PM
I'm concerned that I'm not seeing #studbudz Halloween costumes shared on the interwebs. Please share if you see photos or videos #wnba
November 1, 2025 at 3:45 PM