Huw Price
banner
huwprice.bsky.social
Huw Price
@huwprice.bsky.social

Australian philosopher. Emeritus Bertrand Russell Professor & Emeritus Fellow, Trinity College, Cambridge. Early roles in @cser.bsky.social and
@cfi-cambridge.bsky.social. More: prce.hu/w

Huw Price is an Australian philosopher, formerly the Bertrand Russell Professor in the Faculty of Philosophy, Cambridge, and a Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge.

Source: Wikipedia
Philosophy 47%
Physics 23%
Pinned
Latest piece with @kenwharton.bsky.social

ABSTRACT: In statistics and causal modeling it is common for a selection process to induce correlations in a subset of an uncorrelated ensemble. We propose that EPR and Bell correlations are selection artefacts of this kind. …1/

#philsky #philsci #quantum
Taming Entanglement
In statistics and causal modeling it is common for a selection process to induce correlations in a subset of an uncorrelated ensemble. We propose that EPR and Bell correlations are selection artefacts...
arxiv.org

It’s an ill wind, says my garden.

About your PDE analogy, isn’t it relevant that PH (and FH if any) are macrostate conditions, each presumably consistent with the micro state required for the other? END

Some caveats needed here, particularly Barbour’s ‘Janus faced’ models – there there is an explanation why it is asymmetric on each side of the minimum.

… “Did it work?” “No, it blew up on launch. But this one, as we say, is extremely reliable.” “

If we propose an explanation for PH, the appeal to probability gives no reason for not applying it T-symmetrically. Such an explanation overrides probs in one direction anyway, so why not both? …

… Compare this pitch, from rocket scientists we'll identify only as X. “Here's your spaceship to the stars. It's extremely reliable. We have the best statistical mechanics on the planet, and they've checked every angle. We even fired an identical copy in the opposite direction, just to be sure.” …

… In endorsing the Past Hypothesis ... we already concede that it fails in one of these two possible applications, towards the past. From this point, it looks blockheaded to try to insist that it must nevertheless be a good argument in its other possible application, towards the future. …

I’m suspicious of appealing to probability ‘forwards’ because we know the same argument doesn’t work ‘backwards’. Here’s a quick recent version of the point:

“[T]he probabilistic argument against entropy decrease is an argument with two possible applications, in the two directions of time. …
Huw Price, Lewis and the Price of Time Travel: Lessons from _Großvater_ - PhilPapers
Responding to Lewis’s (1976) defense of the consistency of time travel (TT), Horwich (1987) and Price (1996) claim that TT may nevertheless be shown to be improbable, due to its need ...
philpapers.org

Reposted by Huw Price

Christmas in Vienna. -- Traffic jam. #photography #Vienna #photographyOnBlueSky #Austria

I don’t think it can be *the* problem – it leaves out the issue why they weren’t equilibrated in the first place. When you put that back in, is there a distinct problem about equilibration? If we mean, do we need something T-asymmetric to explain it, I think not. Some stuff on this here:
seminaire-poincare.pages.math.cnrs.fr

This ancient text might be what you have in mind. There’s similar material in Ch. 4 of my book. I second your recommendation about Professor Myrvold.

arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/93...
The Embassy staff of Germany, France and the United Kingdom sing Schedryk in the Kyiv underground.
Wonderful!

Reposted by Huw Price

Merry Christmas! Stay weird y’all.

Reposted by Huw Price

Philip Dawid, visited by ghost of Christmas counterfactual.
Since it's a tense time of year 🫠

Reposted by Huw Price

Philosopher Kate Manne (author of Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny) on the real and troubling conspiracy theory about Trump and Epstein. Worth a read.

katemanne.substack.com/p/the-actual...
The Actual Conspiracy Theory Surrounding Trump and Epstein
It’s not what you think it is.
katemanne.substack.com

Another data point for you, Edouard. This is from Tim Gowers a month or so back. bsky.app/profile/wtgo...

Wonderful!

Yes, a new garden, this is the first time this one has flowered.

”Raspberry Queen“ – known in Vienna @martinkusch.bsky.social?

Reposted by Michela Massimi

Dear #PhilSky,
We are seeking established international scholars to join @westernu.ca and @rotmanphilosophy.bsky.social y.bsky.social.
www.uwo.ca/research/can...
Philosophers of technology (including AI), health, and other areas (see link) are welcome. Please share widely + DM if interested!
Canada-Impact-Plus - Research - Western University
www.uwo.ca

Reposted by Huw Price

Job opening in #histsci #philsci at Wageningen University: Asst. Prof. of Philosophy of Life Sciences, in a group led by Rachel Ankeny. Deadline Jan 12!

www.wur.nl/en/vacancy/a...
Assistant Professor in Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Are you seeking a challenging role in a nurturing and collegial setting that supports rigorous philosophical teaching and research as well as opportunities for productive collaborations with social an...
www.wur.nl

Reposted by Huw Price

Dear #PhilSky,
We are seeking established international scholars to join @westernu.ca and @rotmanphilosophy.bsky.social y.bsky.social.
www.uwo.ca/research/can...
Philosophers of technology (including AI), health, and other areas (see link) are welcome. Please share widely + DM if interested!
Canada-Impact-Plus - Research - Western University
www.uwo.ca

If only I were a week or two younger! :)
JOB IN CANADA!! I hereby encourage leading #STS and #HPS scholars working in areas including advanced digital technologies and democracy to apply for a job in STS at UBC: research.ubc.ca/federal-rese...
Canada Impact+ Research Chairs Program
The University of British Columbia is inviting expressions of interest from top-tier, internationally based researchers as
research.ubc.ca

Nice to see Miss M getting some attention from philosophers. @loigic.bsky.social and I made exemplary use of her talents in our piece ‘Heart of DARCness’ a few years back.

philarchive.org/archive/LIUHOD

What was in the bag? Eggs over-easy would have been a good match.

Promising if the wind is from the left.

And while I’m here, here’s a new in-house chat from DeepMind between Hannah Fry and Shane Legg, DM’s NZ co-founder. They are not talking about xrisk, though Shane signed that letter. I’m curious how the way he talks about AGI etc strikes you, Tim. www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3u_...
The arrival of AGI | Shane Legg (co-founder of DeepMind)
YouTube video by Google DeepMind
www.youtube.com

It’s quite true that experts disagree, but that’s why @heatherdouglas.bsky.social’s points matter so much. We need to consider the costs of error, in deciding where the burden of proof lies. Civility helps, too. Nature failed on both counts.

Nature said: “Fearmongering narratives about existential risks are not constructive. Serious discussion about actual risks, and action to contain them, are.” Is there a qualifier in there that exempts scientists from the criticism?

Reposted by Steven French