Richard Pettigrew
banner
wiglet1981.bsky.social
Richard Pettigrew
@wiglet1981.bsky.social

Philosopher at University of Bristol 🏳️‍🌈 he/him

https://richardpettigrew.com/

Books: Epistemic Risk and the Demands of Rationality | Choosing for Changing Selves | Dutch Book Arguments | Accuracy and the Laws of Credence | Who Are Universities For? .. more

Philosophy 39%
Computer science 14%

Reposted by Richard Pettigrew

My 15yo gave me a very useful Christmas present. You are welcome to it, my old friends

Reposted by Richard Pettigrew

My first paper on disinformation just published. I argue that disinformation should be understood in pragmatic terms (e.g., changing content to influence choice) not epistemic terms (e.g., inducing inaccurate beliefs). You can view with this link. Spoiler in title.

link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007...
Disinformation is for degrading the value of information, not confirming falsehoods
link.springer.com

I don’t remember Brooke Shields having these sorts of delays in A Castle for Christmas

I heard someone describe A Christmas Carol as the first time travel story recently, and it seems the season’s ability to warp the temporal dimension continues unabated
Publication day! It’s been a long journey to get to this point, and I’m grateful to everyone who’s supported that, and to @routledgebooks.bsky.social for publishing it.

Reposted by Richard Pettigrew

Alan Bennett’s diary, 1984.

Reposted by Richard Pettigrew

CHIVELORD HAS DONE IT!!!

PERFECT CHIVES ON DAY 70!!!

TOLL THE TOWN BELL!!! HEAR YE, HEAR YE!!! U/F1EXICAN HAS PERFECTED THE ART OF CHIVE-CUTTING!!

CELEBRATE, YE GOOD PEOPLE!!

Final blogpost of the year: in which I enthuse about Alex Meehan and Snow Zhang’s excellent recent paper ‘Bayes is Back’!
Bayesianism when learning isn't straightforward
Occasionally, you come across a paper you like so much, you feel the need to evangelise about it.
open.substack.com

who don’t know the identity of the authors. And the journal often has policies that rule out such a reviewer. So it slows things down. I notice some people either post the preprint under a different title or submit the paper with the title ‘Title removed for anon review’. I think that does work.

I think it’s really tricky. I love the preprint culture in maths are other parts of the sciences. It seems a really healthy way of ensuring a good pace of discussion. And I do always post mine. But doing more editorial work recently, I’ve noticed it does make it much harder to find expert reviewers

Reposted by Richard Pettigrew

A Tufted Titmouse waits on a nearby branch for sunflower seeds and peanuts to be offered.

Reposted by Richard Pettigrew

Powerful Rest And Fluids Industry Influencing Doctors' Treatment Of Colds https://theonion.com/powerful-rest-and-fluids-industry-influencing-doctors-t-1819570463/

Severance!

Reposted by Richard Pettigrew

Mountain light, Ben Inverveigh #Scotland #LochTulla #Argyll www.damianshields.com
Astonished that Publishers Weekly has put out this great review of DISPATCHES FROM THE AVANT-GARAGE. (What is happening I never get mainstream attention, my world is the weird world (good)) But what I hope is that more people will find out about the Alternative Press, and you know?, now they might!

Reposted by Richard Pettigrew

so does philosophy

Yeah, that seems right. Thanks for humouring me while I procrastinated! Might procrastinate further by reading The Mirror Crack’d.

And that’s not so implausible. You do seem to get people who can really sense what features of people are important for predicting their behaviour. I guess what’s implausible is that her inductive base is large enough.

since they’re similar in that regard, they’ll be similar in this other regard. When she talks of types, that’s all she’s really meaning. I think AC invites us to imagine someone who’s just spectacularly good at sensing when similarity in one respect will make similarity in another respect likely.

Yes, that’s pretty plausible. But here’s another go at an explanation that makes Miss M less ludicrous. What she’s doing is inductive inference. She’s predicting how X behaved on the basis of her experience of how Y behaved. She does this by spotting a similarity between X and Y and infers that,

When trying to predict how someone will react to something, people often cite what some ‘similar’ person did in similar circumstances.

our world, but it’s not morally different from our world. Just as there being lots of murders connected to one elderly rural lady is not our world. Also there’s a general folk belief that something close to Miss M’s approach is correct.

We generally tend not to experience imaginative resistance just because some aspect of the described world is different from ours, do we? It has to be a moral feature of the described world, doesn’t it? Miss Marple’s world is one in which behaviour is predictable on the basis of types. That’s not

Reposted by Richard Pettigrew

can’t, i’m propagating knowledge

Quick question: does this also apply to one’s view about the fundamental source of epistemic value for credences and its role in grounding epistemic norms for reasoning under uncertainty? Asking for a friend.
You know, I think there's something to be said, when doing politics, in favour of just... not being unbelievably tedious? Like, not even as a question of right or wrong or whatever. Just... if you make people sigh and say "yes, we've heard this a hundred times before", you might be doing it wrong

Reposted by Richard Pettigrew

You know, I think there's something to be said, when doing politics, in favour of just... not being unbelievably tedious? Like, not even as a question of right or wrong or whatever. Just... if you make people sigh and say "yes, we've heard this a hundred times before", you might be doing it wrong
I call this "The Lying Screen"
—I’ve been asked to baptise the King of Spain’s daughter
—Infanta?
—No, holy water as usual. Weird thing to ask honestly
Beinn a'Bheithir 'Mountain of the thunderbolt' #Scotland #Glenachulish #Highlands www.damianshields.com