Regulate AI, Europe falls behind

Scholar power: 99.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Margaret Mitchell	47%	50	99.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

23.6 h

37

99.7%

Ranking score

0.121

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Margaret Mitchell

@mmitchell.bsky.social

Love the phrases "Cognitive Cost" and "Executive Function Theft" to pinpoint how exhausting it is to be constantly bombarded with apps telling you to use AI. I've been calling it "Corporate pressure" and "Force feeding". It's quite a lot right now. Seems a bit desperate tbh.

Abigail Goben @hedgielib.bsky.social · 23h

The #ExecutiveFunctionTheft of having to opt out.

Emily M. Bender @emilymbender.bsky.social · 23h

Feeling annoyed at the cognitive cost of having to dismiss all the offers of "AI" assitance every time I use Acrobat to provide feedback on documents my students wrote. (NO I do NOT want an "AI" summary of this. In what world???)

Decided to check settings:

November 10, 2025 at 6:53 PM

by Serge Belongie

140%

Scholar power: 140.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Serge Belongie	46%	104	140.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

58.0%

25.1 h

1

140.7%

Ranking score

0.105

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Serge Belongie

@serge.belongie.com

Interview from last week’s AI in Science summit in Copenhagen ais25.eu

Europe’s Win and Worry with Artificial Intelligence

Launch of RAISE – the Resource for AI Science in Europe.

www.sciencestories.dk

November 10, 2025 at 5:26 PM

by Joanna Bryson

27%

Scholar power: 27.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Joanna Bryson	16%	32	27.2%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

57.0%

10.8 h

3

27.2%

Ranking score

0.089

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Joanna Bryson

@j2bryson.bsky.social

AI is already superhuman. So are libraries, cars, and calculators. Not a reason to abandon the strong history of science-led digital policy in the EU.

Please sign if you have a PhD in or near AI.

#digitalGovernance #AIEthics

pads.c3w.at/form/#/2/for...

CryptPad

pads.c3w.at

November 11, 2025 at 7:45 AM

by Margaret Mitchell

99%

Scholar power: 99.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Margaret Mitchell	47%	50	99.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

45.0%

23.2 h

7

99.7%

Ranking score

0.11

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Margaret Mitchell

@mmitchell.bsky.social

There's this form of behavioral engineering/coercion going on to use AI when you're not even trying to. Ex: Enterprise Google Slides replaced "Upload an Image", with "Generate an Image" (right?), requiring extra work +adaptation to sidestep the AI-as-default push. It drives me bonkers.

Before and After shots of Google slides menu bars, Insert --> Image. Before, the first option was "Upload from computer". After, the first option is "Generate an image", with "Upload from computer" a distant second.

November 10, 2025 at 7:18 PM

by Justin Wolfers

25%

Scholar power: 25.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Justin Wolfers	11%	58	25.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

51.0%

19.6 h

146

25.1%

Ranking score

0.084

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Justin Wolfers

@justinwolfers.bsky.social

Two truths can be true at once: AI may be utterly transformative; Wall Street may be in over its skis. For your 401(k), the lesson from the dot‑com era: diversify broadly so you catch the wave without betting the house on Pets dot com 2.0.

November 10, 2025 at 10:56 PM

Reposted by Steve Peers, Shannon Vallor, Cathy N. Davidson , and 2 more Steve Peers, Shannon Vallor, Cathy N. Davidson, Maksym Polyakov, Alan Richardson

15%

Scholar power: 15.8%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Steve Peers	10%	27	5.2%
🎓 Shannon Vallor	12%	18	5.1%
🎓 Cathy N. Davidson	5%	29	2.7%
🎓 Maksym Polyakov	6%	22	2.8%
🎓 Alan Richardson	0%	21	0.0%
Total			15.8%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

26.5 h

2116

15.8%

Ranking score

0.084

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

cait (and adonis)

@cait.bsky.social

a few months ago I said "having generative AI handle absolutely anything with regards to healthcare is a nightmare and should be banned" and a bunch of people made fun of me and called me stupid. anyways,

r/ExpectationVsReality u/Additional-Simple858 • 3d
Join
Al 'doctor' said my back pain is depression, not a slipped disc. Now physical therapy won't get approved.
Al Expectation

We are reviewing claim #&
submitted on
09/28/2025. Our records indicate the claim was filed under diagnosis code F32.9 (Depressive disorder, unspecified), while the corresponding prescription and referral history list treatment for lumbar disc herniation (back pain).

Re: Incorrect Diagnosis in
Record

Hi
Thank you for reaching out. We have reviewed your visit documentation and can confirm that the notes in question were generated using our Al scribe system. It appears the Al tool assigned diagnosis code F32.9 (Depressive disorder, unspecified), while your visit notes and treatment plan reference lumbar disc herniation (back pain).
Per compliance policy, certain Al-generated fields cannot be manually updated by clinic staff and require vendor correction. We have escalated this to our vendor support team and opened ticket # . We'll notify you once we receive
confirmation or correction from the vendor.

November 10, 2025 at 4:00 PM

Reposted by Virginia Dignum, Frederik Dhondt

21%

Scholar power: 21.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Virginia Dignum	30%	43	19.7%
🎓 Frederik Dhondt	6%	7	1.6%
Total			21.3%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

49.0%

32.7 h

120

21.3%

Ranking score

0.038

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Kris Shrishak

@krisshrishak.bsky.social

Scientists and scholars in AI and its social impacts call on von der Leyen to retract #AIHype statement.

@olivia.science
@abeba.bsky.social
@irisvanrooij.bsky.social
@alexhanna.bsky.social
@rocher.lc
@danmcquillan.bsky.social
@robin.berjon.com
& many others have signed

www.iccl.ie/press-releas...

Scientists call on the President of the European Commission to retract AI hype statement

Experts in AI call on the President of the European Commission to retract unscientific AI hype statement she made in the budget speech.

www.iccl.ie

November 10, 2025 at 9:48 AM

Reposted by Margaret Mitchell

33%

Scholar power: 33.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Margaret Mitchell	47%	50	33.2%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

22.0 h

11

33.2%

Ranking score

0.035

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Emily M. Bender

@emilymbender.bsky.social

If you have been framing your work as involving/in relation to "AI", what do you mean by "AI"? How would you describe your work without using that phrase?

>>

November 10, 2025 at 8:33 PM

by Juliet Lodge

14%

Scholar power: 14.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Juliet Lodge	10%	22	14.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

53.0%

9.4 h

2

14.1%

Ranking score

0.026

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Juliet Lodge

@julietl.bsky.social

www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-i... when it is installed in a health sector that prizes efficiency, surveillance and profit extraction, AI becomes not a tool for care and community but simply another instrument for commodifying human life.

What we lose when we surrender care to algorithms | Eric Reinhart

A dangerous faith in AI is sweeping American healthcare – with consequences for the basis of society itself

www.theguardian.com

November 11, 2025 at 9:07 AM

Reposted by Serge Belongie

46%

Scholar power: 46.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Serge Belongie	46%	104	46.9%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

28.7 h

3

46.9%

Ranking score

0.023

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

ELLIS

@ellis.eu

👋 Meet the ELLIS Board!

We're kicking off the series with @serge.belongie.com, ELLIS Board Pres, Director at @aicentre.dk & Prof at the Uni Copenhagen 🇩🇰.

He tackles rapid-fire AI questions—from AGI to algorithms—& recommends this paper: peterfmichael.com/nci

Watch now 👉 youtu.be/Hj9A59EPGzM

Meet the Board: Serge Belongie (ELLIS Board President | Pioneer Centre for AI, Uni Copenhagen)

YouTube video by ELLIS

youtu.be

November 10, 2025 at 1:50 PM

Reposted by Avi Goldfarb, Philip E. Tetlock

8%

Scholar power: 8.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Avi Goldfarb	6%	56	4.5%
🎓 Philip E. Tetlock	4%	78	3.5%
Total			8.0%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

51.0%

28.5 h

75

8.0%

Ranking score

0.018

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Daniel J. Solove

19%

Scholar power: 19.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Daniel J. Solove	12%	30	19.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

59.0%

25.6 h

1

19.7%

Ranking score

0.016

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Daniel Solove

@daniel-solove.bsky.social

“AI is trained based on a massive taking of people’s data without consent, oversight, limitation, or any consideration of the harms it might create.” – from “The Great Scrape” FINAL PUBLISHED ARTICLE papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

November 10, 2025 at 4:57 PM

by Jonathan Hopkin

14%

Scholar power: 14.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Jonathan Hopkin	9%	29	14.5%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

9.7 h

0

14.5%

Ranking score

0.014

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Jonathan Hopkin

@jonathanhopkin.bsky.social

An AI lobbyist writes

Times Higher Education (THE) @timeshighered.bsky.social · 10h

Opinion: “It’s difficult to think of another sector that has so dismally failed to strategically engage with the transformative potential of information technology.”

🖊️ Ian Richardson #highered #EduSky
https://ow.ly/zXc850Xpvbu

November 11, 2025 at 8:50 AM

by Patrick Dunleavy

18%

Scholar power: 18.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Patrick Dunleavy	9%	46	18.3%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

57.0%

28.5 h

0

18.3%

Ranking score

0.012

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Patrick Dunleavy

@patrickdunleavy.bsky.social

Interesting view on UK perhaps lagging on AI again now?https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aeb2621

Britain must step up on AI policy

In their Policy Forum, “Advancing science- and evidence-based AI policy” (31 July, 10.1126/science.adu8449), R. Bommasani et al. emphasize the importance of evidence-led policy-making for artificial i...

www.science.org

November 10, 2025 at 2:00 PM

Reposted by Matt Grossmann, Robb Willer

5%

Scholar power: 5.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Matt Grossmann	8%	17	3.3%
🎓 Robb Willer	3%	54	2.2%
Total			5.5%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

53.0%

27.9 h

30

5.5%

Ranking score

0.012

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by The Lancet

6%

Scholar power: 6.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 The Lancet	3%	59	6.9%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

52.0%

29.0 h

4

6.9%

Ranking score

0.012

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Patrick Dunleavy

18%

Scholar power: 18.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Patrick Dunleavy	9%	46	18.3%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

54.0%

28.5 h

1

18.3%

Ranking score

0.01

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Brendan Nyhan

17%

Scholar power: 17.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Brendan Nyhan	8%	51	17.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

28.2 h

8

17.1%

Ranking score

0.009

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Brendan Nyhan

@brendannyhan.bsky.social

New AI timeline forecasts from The Longitudinal Expert AI Panel forecastingresearch.substack.com/p/introducin... Lots of uncertainty but more expert/superforecaster convergence than I expected

November 10, 2025 at 2:18 PM

Reposted by Dorothy Bishop

0%

Scholar power: 0.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Dorothy Bishop	0%	114	0.0%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

57.0%

10.5 h

1

0.0%

Ranking score

0.009

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Mark A. Hanson

@hansonmark.bsky.social

Mind if I ask for your take @carlbergstrom.com ? Would be curious where your thoughts on AI review are present and future.

I can't help but feel AI logic regresses to the mean as it's trained with good+bad papers and reviews.

Experts can discard bad info. AI reliably incorporates it.

November 11, 2025 at 8:02 AM

by Thibault Schrepel

18%

Scholar power: 18.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Computer science 37%, Law 26%, Economics 21%, Political science 16%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Thibault Schrepel	20%	9	18.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

53.0%

29.5 h

0

18.0%

Ranking score

0.009

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Thibault Schrepel

@profschrepel.bsky.social

Mario Draghi is right to worry about the #AIAct, but wrong about the cure. A pause won’t fix the EU AI Act. The problem isn’t speed; it’s rigidity. www.theregreview.org/2025/11/03/s...

November 10, 2025 at 1:01 PM

Light upyour news

Regulate AI, Europe falls behind

Scholar power: 99.7%

Scholar power: 140.7%

Scholar power: 27.2%

Scholar power: 99.7%

Scholar power: 25.1%

Scholar power: 15.8%

Scholar power: 21.3%

Scholar power: 33.2%

Scholar power: 14.1%

Scholar power: 46.9%

Scholar power: 8.0%

Scholar power: 19.7%

Scholar power: 14.5%

Scholar power: 18.3%

Scholar power: 5.5%

Scholar power: 6.9%

Scholar power: 18.3%

Scholar power: 17.1%

Scholar power: 0.0%

Scholar power: 18.0%

Sign in to Lightnews

Sign up to start reading

Connect Bluesky

Connect with Bluesky

Light up
your news