Thibault Schrepel
banner
profschrepel.bsky.social
Thibault Schrepel
@profschrepel.bsky.social

Associate Prof VU Amsterdam • Faculty Affiliate Stanford • Into Running 🏃🏻
#antitrust #AI #complexityscience #digitalmarkets #blockchain
📕 www.thibaultschrepel.com
📻 https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scalingtheory

Economics 42%
Computer science 22%
Pinned
My rule for interactions on BlueSky (and elsewhere) is simple: I always assume it’s my interlocutor’s birthday. This means my messages are sent with kindness and compassion.

Mario Draghi is right to worry about the #AIAct, but wrong about the cure. A pause won’t fix the EU AI Act. The problem isn’t speed; it’s rigidity. www.theregreview.org/2025/11/03/s...

Big crush on Barcelona. See you soon!

What’s the link between Charles Mingus, Ornette Coleman and antitrust policy in AI? Answer in 1h www.youtube.com/live/kLs9HpA...

Congratulations to the Conseil de la concurrence 🇲🇦 for such a great event. African and Arab countries are coming together and taking leadership on many fronts.

Pictures? :)

For anyone reading this, I can only recommend running. It’s a humbling form of inquiry. Happy to exchange thoughts or experiences with anyone who wants to get started.

As an academic, I also value the clarity of this experience. Progress can be measured week after week, and the result, whatever it is, belongs entirely to the runner. No one can alter it, one way or the other. That simplicity carries its own form of truth.

In fact, fellow runners pull you forward when every part of you wants to stop. In that sense, the marathon shows how progress depends as much on shared pace as on individual drive.

This may seem unrelated to competition law or academic work. It is not. At least not for me. The marathon is not a race against others, but against one’s own limits and... expectations.

Last Sunday, I ran the Frankfurt Marathon and was fortunate to come in just under three hours. A short thread.

Au plaisir d’un run à Londres !

Bravo !! Ce vent… j’ai souffert !

Off to Frankfurt for the marathon this weekend. I ran 785 km in the past two months or so. Time to enjoy the race.

As an academic, I love that running’s outcome isn’t decided by others. It’s pure merit, yet profoundly human, because running together is what gets you there.

Europe’s pursuit of digital sovereignty will, paradoxically, ensure dependency. We spend without the means to match our ambitions, and in the meantime ignore the partnerships that could keep us in the game. The result? We’ll import what others built, without our input.
EU’s AI Continent: powered on.

We are accelerating European AI development with the launch of six new AI Factories in 🇨🇿 🇱🇹 🇳🇱 🇷🇴 🇪🇸 🇵🇱 ↓

Reposted by Thibault Schrepel

EU’s AI Continent: powered on.

We are accelerating European AI development with the launch of six new AI Factories in 🇨🇿 🇱🇹 🇳🇱 🇷🇴 🇪🇸 🇵🇱 ↓

#Democracy runs on opinion.
#Futarchy runs on beliefs.
Robin Hanson joins me on Scaling Theory to discuss why governance might often need to run on market logic.
• Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/6UFN...
• YouTube: youtu.be/tXc9rukqZ4s?...
• Apple: podcasts.apple.com/fr/podcast/s...

Reposted by Thibault Schrepel

The EU's "future-proof" AI regulation is a fantasy. AI evolves through emergent properties—GPT-1 to GPT-4 was metamorphosis, not iteration. We need future-responsive regulation, not monuments By @profschrepel.bsky.social at @networklawreview.bsky.social
www.networklawreview.org/schrepel-fut...
The Future-Proof Fantasy of AI Regulation - Network Law Review
The EU’s quest for “future-proof” AI regulation is a fantasy. AI evolves through emergent properties that defy prediction, yet Brussels continues to draft rules with an industrial, linear mindset. The...
www.networklawreview.org

Happening today!
Search for "Annual Conference on European Competition Law, 16–17 October 2025" to register. I’ll argue that recent Art. 102 cases and the DMA now fully overlap, which turns complementarity into an echo chamber. 🌀

Despite repeated calls for transparency, the EC gives little detail on how it handles contributions. It fails to explain why ideas appearing in multiple submissions are dismissed, and instead (often) cites the volume of contributions to justify one-sided proposals. We can (and should!) do better.
We have launched a public consultation on draft guidelines on the intersection of the Digital Markets Act and GDPR.

We want to hear your views on the guidelines to improve legal clarity for businesses and ensure coherent enforcement.

📅 Feedback open until 4 Dec 2025

link.europa.eu/gbmdVY

You’d think innovation plays a central role in digital antitrust cases. Well, well, well… papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

Timing coincidence? The European Commission is just fining Chloé (among others), the fashion house founded by Philippe Aghion’s mother.

Many congratulations to these three brilliant economists! I’m especially thrilled to see Philippe Aghion among them. Philippe wrote the preface to my PhD thesis… a gentle reminder that correlation does not imply causation 😅

Reposted by Thibault Schrepel

We have launched a public consultation on draft guidelines on the intersection of the Digital Markets Act and GDPR.

We want to hear your views on the guidelines to improve legal clarity for businesses and ensure coherent enforcement.

📅 Feedback open until 4 Dec 2025

link.europa.eu/gbmdVY

I’ve just updated this database compiling all initiatives taken by antitrust agencies on generative AI www.networklawreview.org/antitrust-ge... I hope it proves useful to some of you.

Reposted by Thibault Schrepel

New Antitrust Antidote: Apple case moves ahead; per se tying theory on Hermès doesn’t fly; alleged algorithmic/benchmarking collusion suits stumble on pleadings... All you need to know about recent U.S. antitrust cases is here: www.networklawreview.org/antidote-7/

In this piece for Times Higher Education, I suggest a few simple experiments that any professor can run to see how GenAI impacts their own students. I hope this proves useful to some of you. www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/how-t...

www.nber.org/papers/w34194
Interesting one. Market power persistence isn’t about lax antitrust enforcement. It’s the technology + learning dynamics that give certain cohorts lasting dominance.

Reposted by Thibault Schrepel

Here are @profschrepel.bsky.social’s monthly reading suggestions: DMA & EU users, killer acquisitions, auditable AI, AI Act political economy, GenAI & democracy, AI agents in econ, adaptive regulation + a special issue on law, tech & econ of AI: www.networklawreview.org/september-20...

New essay out.

The AI Act multiplies review clauses, delegated acts, monitoring obligations. But it lacks true adaptive capacity. In complexity science terms, the EU has built “sensors without reflexes.”

I hope this resonates with colleagues working on AI governance.
The EU says its AI rules are “future proof.” They’re not, @profschrepel.bsky.social argues. Without adaptive regulation (modular rules, real-time monitoring, plural triggers, institutional memory) Brussels (and others!) will always be behind the curve. www.networklawreview.org/schrepel-fut...

Reposted by Thibault Schrepel

The EU says its AI rules are “future proof.” They’re not, @profschrepel.bsky.social argues. Without adaptive regulation (modular rules, real-time monitoring, plural triggers, institutional memory) Brussels (and others!) will always be behind the curve. www.networklawreview.org/schrepel-fut...