After a week of voting on 32 of the worst people in the tech industry, we have a winner!
The Worst Person in Tech for 2025 is…
🚀 ELON MUSK 🎉
Chief AI Officer Dec. 2024- Present
|
Chief NFT Officer Feb. 2023 - Dec. 2024
|
Chief Metaverse Officer Jun. 2022 - Feb. 2023
tech won’t save us
tech won’t save us
Or better yet, those MPs who despise Wellington to their core? How much would it cost to bribe them to resign, fuck off out of Wellington and never come back?
Or better yet, those MPs who despise Wellington to their core? How much would it cost to bribe them to resign, fuck off out of Wellington and never come back?
Merriam, a career-oriented lexicographer from the city, returns to her small town for the holidays and meets Webster, a ruggedly handsome librarian, who shows her the true DEFINITION of Christmas.
Merriam, a career-oriented lexicographer from the city, returns to her small town for the holidays and meets Webster, a ruggedly handsome librarian, who shows her the true DEFINITION of Christmas.
Food poisoning warning after Christchurch students eat contaminated school lunches www.rnz.co.nz/news/nationa...
Food poisoning warning after Christchurch students eat contaminated school lunches www.rnz.co.nz/news/nationa...
The real lesson is:
🔹️most work of exec class is substance-less illusions.
If AI is useful in a given use case its because you really only care about form, not substance [as an aside, this why such a great plagiarism machine].
The real lesson is:
🔹️most work of exec class is substance-less illusions.
If AI is useful in a given use case its because you really only care about form, not substance [as an aside, this why such a great plagiarism machine].
A useful rule of thumb: genAI gets it 80% right about 70% of the time. If you like those tolerances, it's fab - if not 😬
A useful rule of thumb: genAI gets it 80% right about 70% of the time. If you like those tolerances, it's fab - if not 😬
(1) Most exec will grossly overestimate the broad utility and efficacy of AI because of confirmation bias.
Its good for them, so must be good for everyone. They will only listen to evidence that validates THEIR experiences
(1) Most exec will grossly overestimate the broad utility and efficacy of AI because of confirmation bias.
Its good for them, so must be good for everyone. They will only listen to evidence that validates THEIR experiences
This is both easy to believe and easy to misinterpret. AI is *genuinely* useful if what matters is FORM. Terrible at SUBSTANCE.
If useful for your job = your job just form.
A 🧵
www.businessinsider.com/executives-a...
This is both easy to believe and easy to misinterpret. AI is *genuinely* useful if what matters is FORM. Terrible at SUBSTANCE.
If useful for your job = your job just form.
A 🧵
www.businessinsider.com/executives-a...
🔹️Execs ❤️ AI.
🔹️Workers (who care about getting it right) dont.
🔹️But because of confirmation bias, execs tend to take lesson that it's great for everyone.
🔹️So execs want everyone to use it, and are convinced it will increase efficiency
🔹️Execs ❤️ AI.
🔹️Workers (who care about getting it right) dont.
🔹️But because of confirmation bias, execs tend to take lesson that it's great for everyone.
🔹️So execs want everyone to use it, and are convinced it will increase efficiency
#nzpol
assets.nationbuilder.com/beachheroes/...
#nzpol
assets.nationbuilder.com/beachheroes/...