Natural Snark
@naturalsnark.bsky.social
Reposted by Natural Snark
Reposted by Natural Snark
Yep, I'll blame the people who refuse to do the bare minimum to fight against Trump. Can confirm.
March 10, 2024 at 7:49 PM
Yep, I'll blame the people who refuse to do the bare minimum to fight against Trump. Can confirm.
Reposted by Natural Snark
Voting for the lesser of two evils stands to get you the lesser of two evils.
Trump's party is telling us, openly, their plan for a white Christian nationalist future.
Our choice is between that or Biden, and no amount of ink spilled will change that.
Trump's party is telling us, openly, their plan for a white Christian nationalist future.
Our choice is between that or Biden, and no amount of ink spilled will change that.
March 10, 2024 at 10:44 PM
Voting for the lesser of two evils stands to get you the lesser of two evils.
Trump's party is telling us, openly, their plan for a white Christian nationalist future.
Our choice is between that or Biden, and no amount of ink spilled will change that.
Trump's party is telling us, openly, their plan for a white Christian nationalist future.
Our choice is between that or Biden, and no amount of ink spilled will change that.
Reposted by Natural Snark
Me going through every viral letter from “scientists” who say climate change is fake and counting the engineers
March 10, 2024 at 3:19 PM
Me going through every viral letter from “scientists” who say climate change is fake and counting the engineers
Reposted by Natural Snark
Reposted by Natural Snark
Reposted by Natural Snark
This is the main point, I agree. The left is an unreliable partner in that they cannot demonstrate that they will reliably vote for D candidates who move left. They will just escalate demands and still not vote.
March 5, 2024 at 6:49 PM
This is the main point, I agree. The left is an unreliable partner in that they cannot demonstrate that they will reliably vote for D candidates who move left. They will just escalate demands and still not vote.
Reposted by Natural Snark
Stephen Miller plans on setting up posses the first day of the administration rounding up people who look too brown.
That is the difference. If this doesn't matter to you, stay home, vote for Jill Stein or whatever. But know, that this is the plan.
That is the difference. If this doesn't matter to you, stay home, vote for Jill Stein or whatever. But know, that this is the plan.
March 5, 2024 at 8:13 PM
Stephen Miller plans on setting up posses the first day of the administration rounding up people who look too brown.
That is the difference. If this doesn't matter to you, stay home, vote for Jill Stein or whatever. But know, that this is the plan.
That is the difference. If this doesn't matter to you, stay home, vote for Jill Stein or whatever. But know, that this is the plan.
Hey, maybe that is an actual example of how mail in vote protections work thst even the constantly drunk uncle Jim-Bob, who defends MAGA at every family dinner, can mentally process...
She got twurdered.
OH MY GOD…
A Turning Point rep (Charlie Kirk’s org) tweeted this out and look at the response.
A Turning Point rep (Charlie Kirk’s org) tweeted this out and look at the response.
February 29, 2024 at 8:26 AM
Hey, maybe that is an actual example of how mail in vote protections work thst even the constantly drunk uncle Jim-Bob, who defends MAGA at every family dinner, can mentally process...
Reposted by Natural Snark
This is not, in fact, what a die-in is. Just so we're all clear. A die-in is a form of group protest in which participants collectively lie down in silence (as if dead) in a location typically meant to disrupt foot traffic for a predetermined amount of time.
Just in case.
Just in case.
February 27, 2024 at 12:02 AM
This is not, in fact, what a die-in is. Just so we're all clear. A die-in is a form of group protest in which participants collectively lie down in silence (as if dead) in a location typically meant to disrupt foot traffic for a predetermined amount of time.
Just in case.
Just in case.
Reposted by Natural Snark
There is absolutely no god that would worship that would allow this.
Assuming a hypothetical god (that I don't believe in): Either god is involved in humanity and allows these things to happen or they are a clock-maker and don't give a shit (in which case, no need for worship).
Assuming a hypothetical god (that I don't believe in): Either god is involved in humanity and allows these things to happen or they are a clock-maker and don't give a shit (in which case, no need for worship).
February 27, 2024 at 12:28 AM
There is absolutely no god that would worship that would allow this.
Assuming a hypothetical god (that I don't believe in): Either god is involved in humanity and allows these things to happen or they are a clock-maker and don't give a shit (in which case, no need for worship).
Assuming a hypothetical god (that I don't believe in): Either god is involved in humanity and allows these things to happen or they are a clock-maker and don't give a shit (in which case, no need for worship).
Reposted by Natural Snark
Reposted by Natural Snark
Reposted by Natural Snark
About 99% of toxic online left politics is because for some people, dunking on others is more important than anything else.
February 22, 2024 at 3:06 PM
About 99% of toxic online left politics is because for some people, dunking on others is more important than anything else.
Reposted by Natural Snark
The reality is there are only three choices:
1) Biden
2) Trump
3) Letting other people decide for you.
People can tell themselves, and other people, what ever reason they want for not picking 1 or 2, but they all amount to 3 "letting other people decide for you."
medium.com/@cshirky/the...
1) Biden
2) Trump
3) Letting other people decide for you.
People can tell themselves, and other people, what ever reason they want for not picking 1 or 2, but they all amount to 3 "letting other people decide for you."
medium.com/@cshirky/the...
medium.com
February 8, 2024 at 12:27 AM
The reality is there are only three choices:
1) Biden
2) Trump
3) Letting other people decide for you.
People can tell themselves, and other people, what ever reason they want for not picking 1 or 2, but they all amount to 3 "letting other people decide for you."
medium.com/@cshirky/the...
1) Biden
2) Trump
3) Letting other people decide for you.
People can tell themselves, and other people, what ever reason they want for not picking 1 or 2, but they all amount to 3 "letting other people decide for you."
medium.com/@cshirky/the...
Reposted by Natural Snark
Auf Threads gesehen und für wunderbar befunden
February 7, 2024 at 4:34 PM
Auf Threads gesehen und für wunderbar befunden
Reposted by Natural Snark
Reposted by Natural Snark
English jurist Sir William Blackstone established "Blackstone's Ratio" in his writings on law in 1760.
"It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."
This formed the basis for presumption of innocence and burden of proof in English common law.
"It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."
This formed the basis for presumption of innocence and burden of proof in English common law.
February 6, 2024 at 1:48 PM
English jurist Sir William Blackstone established "Blackstone's Ratio" in his writings on law in 1760.
"It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."
This formed the basis for presumption of innocence and burden of proof in English common law.
"It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."
This formed the basis for presumption of innocence and burden of proof in English common law.
Reposted by Natural Snark
