Mike Grady
@mgrady69.bsky.social
Husband, Dad, Author, Small Businessman, and lover of Golden Retrievers
Reposted by Mike Grady
Why does Trump need to support the House vote to release the Epstein files? Can't he just order their release himself?
November 17, 2025 at 2:50 PM
Why does Trump need to support the House vote to release the Epstein files? Can't he just order their release himself?
Exactly. Just release the files. You can do it without Congressional action, my dude.
In an apparent policy shift, US president Donald Trump has called on House Republicans to vote for a bill that would force the Department of Justice to release the Epstein files.
As president, Trump could just order the Department of Justice to release the files, without needing a vote.
As president, Trump could just order the Department of Justice to release the files, without needing a vote.
November 17, 2025 at 3:39 PM
Exactly. Just release the files. You can do it without Congressional action, my dude.
When you know you’re going to lose the vote by a mile
Trump: "House Republicans should vote to release the Epstein files, because we have nothing to hide."
November 17, 2025 at 2:58 AM
When you know you’re going to lose the vote by a mile
Reposted by Mike Grady
NEW: Epstein survivors release the most powerful PSA I have ever seen.
Make this go viral so every member of the House of Representatives sees it.
Make this go viral so every member of the House of Representatives sees it.
November 16, 2025 at 11:43 PM
NEW: Epstein survivors release the most powerful PSA I have ever seen.
Make this go viral so every member of the House of Representatives sees it.
Make this go viral so every member of the House of Representatives sees it.
Reposted by Mike Grady
admitting to statutory rape to own the libs
epstein emails released and everyone coming out as a pedophile to defend donald trump
November 17, 2025 at 12:07 AM
admitting to statutory rape to own the libs
Reposted by Mike Grady
November 16, 2025 at 7:57 PM
Reposted by Mike Grady
Trump: “Tariffs protect you!”
Also Trump (a few months later): “We’re cutting tariffs to help with the cost of living!”
Economists: “So… you admit it?”
Trump: nervous coughing noises
Also Trump (a few months later): “We’re cutting tariffs to help with the cost of living!”
Economists: “So… you admit it?”
Trump: nervous coughing noises
November 16, 2025 at 1:51 PM
Trump: “Tariffs protect you!”
Also Trump (a few months later): “We’re cutting tariffs to help with the cost of living!”
Economists: “So… you admit it?”
Trump: nervous coughing noises
Also Trump (a few months later): “We’re cutting tariffs to help with the cost of living!”
Economists: “So… you admit it?”
Trump: nervous coughing noises
Reposted by Mike Grady
The Founders were so concerned about bribery that the Constitution forbids it three separate times. Two emoluments clauses ban officials—unambiguously including the president—from accepting things of value, plus bribery is the only named impeachable offense besides treason.
Unprecedentedly corrupt.
Unprecedentedly corrupt.
To negotiate a trade deal with the President of the United States, the Swiss government arrived with a "special Rolex desktop clock" and "a 1-kilogram personalized gold bar"
www.axios.com/2025/11/14/t...
www.axios.com/2025/11/14/t...
How to lobby Trump with Swiss precision: gifts, gold and gab
How the Swiss broke a diplomatic logjam on tariffs by arriving with tributes fit for a king.
www.axios.com
November 16, 2025 at 1:50 PM
The Founders were so concerned about bribery that the Constitution forbids it three separate times. Two emoluments clauses ban officials—unambiguously including the president—from accepting things of value, plus bribery is the only named impeachable offense besides treason.
Unprecedentedly corrupt.
Unprecedentedly corrupt.
Reposted by Mike Grady
WeRateDogs turns 10 years old today! A very silly idea to numerically objectify dogs has become one of the kindest and most powerful online communities ever. Thank you for joining us over the last decade. I never knew what this could be until you all showed me. Here's to many more good dogs ❤️
November 15, 2025 at 3:42 PM
WeRateDogs turns 10 years old today! A very silly idea to numerically objectify dogs has become one of the kindest and most powerful online communities ever. Thank you for joining us over the last decade. I never knew what this could be until you all showed me. Here's to many more good dogs ❤️
Free advice: Don’t hire Alan Dershowitz as your defense attorney.
Dershowitz: The predecessor on your show described Epstein as a convicted pedophile. He pleaded guilty to one count of having sex for money with a 17-year-and-10-month-old person. That’s not a pedophile.
November 15, 2025 at 4:59 AM
Free advice: Don’t hire Alan Dershowitz as your defense attorney.
Oh for fucks sake
NEW: DOJ has been in settlement talks with Michael Flynn -- Trump's first national security adviser seeking $50M for his prosecution by ex-special counsel Robert Mueller -- and Stefan Passantino, a Trump I White House lawyer who accused the House Jan. 6 committee of privacy violations
bit.ly/4hWdolc
bit.ly/4hWdolc
November 14, 2025 at 8:47 PM
Oh for fucks sake
Especially posting this on the same day RFKjr's ex-mistress, Olivia Nuzzi, is getting her glow-up in the NYTimes for her memoir about their affair.
I can't imagine Susie Wiles is thankful for this "help"
I can't imagine Susie Wiles is thankful for this "help"
If there’s a nascent power struggle around the WH COS (and there always is), the thing that will quash it is definitely a major cabinet secretary publicly calling attention to it with vague accusations in a social media post.
November 14, 2025 at 8:36 PM
Especially posting this on the same day RFKjr's ex-mistress, Olivia Nuzzi, is getting her glow-up in the NYTimes for her memoir about their affair.
I can't imagine Susie Wiles is thankful for this "help"
I can't imagine Susie Wiles is thankful for this "help"
No one should approach this in any other way.
I can recognize (and enjoy) it is politically damaging to Trump, AND be perfectly comfortable with an investigation like this going where it goes. These two thoughts are not mutually exclusive.
I can recognize (and enjoy) it is politically damaging to Trump, AND be perfectly comfortable with an investigation like this going where it goes. These two thoughts are not mutually exclusive.
Exposing the Epstein Network is not going to be politically convenient. If your interest in unravelling a child rape network is to only take down Trump, you aren't interested in justice. Sure it can take him down, but you must adult up; accept it'll take down some of your favourite politicians too.
November 14, 2025 at 6:48 PM
No one should approach this in any other way.
I can recognize (and enjoy) it is politically damaging to Trump, AND be perfectly comfortable with an investigation like this going where it goes. These two thoughts are not mutually exclusive.
I can recognize (and enjoy) it is politically damaging to Trump, AND be perfectly comfortable with an investigation like this going where it goes. These two thoughts are not mutually exclusive.
Reposted by Mike Grady
Oh no not bill clinton and lawrence summers anyone but those, mr president
November 14, 2025 at 4:55 PM
Oh no not bill clinton and lawrence summers anyone but those, mr president
As they should have been doing all along.
The threshold question is if they are giving a pass to the President’s friends, and only targeting his perceived enemies.
They should be following the evidence wherever it leads and taking action without regard to party or power.
The threshold question is if they are giving a pass to the President’s friends, and only targeting his perceived enemies.
They should be following the evidence wherever it leads and taking action without regard to party or power.
President Trump says he's asking the Justice Department to investigate Jeffrey Epstein's ties to high-profile figures, including political foes https://cnn.it/3M1ebp3
November 14, 2025 at 4:34 PM
As they should have been doing all along.
The threshold question is if they are giving a pass to the President’s friends, and only targeting his perceived enemies.
They should be following the evidence wherever it leads and taking action without regard to party or power.
The threshold question is if they are giving a pass to the President’s friends, and only targeting his perceived enemies.
They should be following the evidence wherever it leads and taking action without regard to party or power.
Reposted by Mike Grady
Say what you will about social media, but there was no other point in history where you got to read thousands of people trying to explain Catholicism directly to the Pope
November 14, 2025 at 2:13 PM
Say what you will about social media, but there was no other point in history where you got to read thousands of people trying to explain Catholicism directly to the Pope
Reposted by Mike Grady
i know i know but...
larry summers, lol
larry summers, lol
November 14, 2025 at 4:57 AM
i know i know but...
larry summers, lol
larry summers, lol
This is an excellent insight.
This implications of this bullshit Hitler DNA project are absolute trash. You can't determine whether someone's gonna become a Nazi via DNA. The effort to explain things that way is itself the kind of thing Nazis would do.
November 14, 2025 at 4:26 AM
This is an excellent insight.
Reposted by Mike Grady
Catholic bishops collectively taking to Tik Tok to decry the war on immigrants is very notable: www.tiktok.com/@usbishops/v...
“We as Catholic bishops love our country and pray for its peace and prosperity. For this very reason, we feel compelled now in this environment to raise our voices in defense of God-given human dignit...
TikTok video by usbishops
www.tiktok.com
November 14, 2025 at 1:58 AM
Catholic bishops collectively taking to Tik Tok to decry the war on immigrants is very notable: www.tiktok.com/@usbishops/v...
It’s official. Oreo has finally run out of weird flavor ideas and has returned to the original source code.
oh wow that’s crazy
oreos with bits of
of oreos. in them
Real Bits of Oreos
oreos with bits of
of oreos. in them
Real Bits of Oreos
November 14, 2025 at 12:16 AM
It’s official. Oreo has finally run out of weird flavor ideas and has returned to the original source code.
Reposted by Mike Grady
At the same time the NY Times was hyping Hillary Clinton's emails, it had a reporter with emails from Jeffrey Epstein that were highly damaging to Trump.
The more NYT apologists try to minimize this the clearer it becomes that they don't understand why much of the public doesn't trust legacy media.
The more NYT apologists try to minimize this the clearer it becomes that they don't understand why much of the public doesn't trust legacy media.
November 13, 2025 at 5:44 PM
At the same time the NY Times was hyping Hillary Clinton's emails, it had a reporter with emails from Jeffrey Epstein that were highly damaging to Trump.
The more NYT apologists try to minimize this the clearer it becomes that they don't understand why much of the public doesn't trust legacy media.
The more NYT apologists try to minimize this the clearer it becomes that they don't understand why much of the public doesn't trust legacy media.
It is always the people you least expect
The woman whom the House Ethics Committee determined Matt Gaetz paid for sex when she was 17 years old was living in a homeless shelter, working at McDonald's, and needed the money for braces www.nytimes.com/2025/11/13/u...
November 13, 2025 at 7:13 PM
It is always the people you least expect
Jesus H. Christ. These people are diseased
in case you're wondering how the cope is going www.mediamatters.org/megyn-kelly/...
November 13, 2025 at 4:42 AM
Jesus H. Christ. These people are diseased
Reposted by Mike Grady
turns out the emails we should have been reading in 2016 were from the NYT
November 12, 2025 at 10:34 PM
turns out the emails we should have been reading in 2016 were from the NYT
I said to a friend a few days ago the I was starting a re-watch of Station Eleven because I needed more hope in my life.
Started the re-watch and forgot how next level awesome this adaptation was. Equal to the book, but different in all the right ways to make superior television.
Started the re-watch and forgot how next level awesome this adaptation was. Equal to the book, but different in all the right ways to make superior television.
November 13, 2025 at 3:23 AM
I said to a friend a few days ago the I was starting a re-watch of Station Eleven because I needed more hope in my life.
Started the re-watch and forgot how next level awesome this adaptation was. Equal to the book, but different in all the right ways to make superior television.
Started the re-watch and forgot how next level awesome this adaptation was. Equal to the book, but different in all the right ways to make superior television.