CEO of Ito (itoworld.com)
If unintentional, it's incompetent. If intentional, it's unconscionable.
Either way, it's grounds for dismissal for any editor.
As my partner just put it, tone matters.
If unintentional, it's incompetent. If intentional, it's unconscionable.
Either way, it's grounds for dismissal for any editor.
As my partner just put it, tone matters.
Those Epstein files must be wild.
Those Epstein files must be wild.
This timeline sucks
This timeline sucks
Leaving refugees in permanent limbo and unable to build a new life in the UK would be a complete abdication of our humanitarian responsibilities
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
FFS
FFS
Of course they are: buying fossil fuels and burning them is obscenely expensive and unreliable and requires constant, expensive support
Of course they are: buying fossil fuels and burning them is obscenely expensive and unreliable and requires constant, expensive support
"Apocalypse Now, the triumphant story of US military success"
"Apocalypse Now, the triumphant story of US military success"
Renewables expansion has been on a tear but Germany has seen reversals before, unfortunately. And the country still does not have oil or gas and isn’t getting any anytime soon (ever).
Renewables expansion has been on a tear but Germany has seen reversals before, unfortunately. And the country still does not have oil or gas and isn’t getting any anytime soon (ever).
Please sign if you have a PhD in or near AI.
#digitalGovernance #AIEthics
pads.c3w.at/form/#/2/for...
Please sign if you have a PhD in or near AI.
#digitalGovernance #AIEthics
pads.c3w.at/form/#/2/for...
Just look at their response to the recent attacks on migrants.
Starmer will eventually make a clunky speech saying he supports the BBC while further cutting the licence fee and saying that there are "legitimate concerns" about their coverage of Trump.
on.ft.com/3JVxC1Z via @FT
Just look at their response to the recent attacks on migrants.
Starmer will eventually make a clunky speech saying he supports the BBC while further cutting the licence fee and saying that there are "legitimate concerns" about their coverage of Trump.
Internal documents suggest that Meta earns $3.5B(!) every 6 mo. from scam ads, revealing a deeper systemic problem: the economic incentive to tolerate “higher legal risk” content still outweighs any penalty. www.reuters.com/investigatio...
Internal documents suggest that Meta earns $3.5B(!) every 6 mo. from scam ads, revealing a deeper systemic problem: the economic incentive to tolerate “higher legal risk” content still outweighs any penalty. www.reuters.com/investigatio...
Full stop.
Full stop.
It was, at the time, called the Nuremberg Trials...
It was, at the time, called the Nuremberg Trials...