Antifáwen /Ï\🍄🧙♂️
@antifawen.bsky.social
They/That, Agender, Level 37 CN Mushroom Wizard. Norse Animist, Artificer, Anarcho-Cynicist, AuDHD, Autodidact Polymath, Existential Rights Extremist.
Living on Siletz land.
Living on Siletz land.
The sheer naivete of someone acknowledging they are looking down the barrel of an authoritarian dictatorship, and *still* thinking the solution is "...just VOTE BLUE..." is absolutely mind boggling.
If you can't accept that more extreme resistance is now required, you are a liability, not an ally.
If you can't accept that more extreme resistance is now required, you are a liability, not an ally.
THATS GAME, FOLKS
no more pretending things are ok, that we're on a precipice in danger of sliding into authoritarian dictator shit some unspecified time in the future if we don't just VOTE BLUE in 2028! we're in the shit right now and anyone who doesn't acknowledge that is lying to you purposefully
no more pretending things are ok, that we're on a precipice in danger of sliding into authoritarian dictator shit some unspecified time in the future if we don't just VOTE BLUE in 2028! we're in the shit right now and anyone who doesn't acknowledge that is lying to you purposefully
Breaking WaPo:
A top Justice Department lawyer has told lawmakers that the Trump administration can continue its lethal strikes against alleged drug traffickers in Latin America — and is not bound by a decades-old law requiring Congress to give approval for ongoing hostilities.
A top Justice Department lawyer has told lawmakers that the Trump administration can continue its lethal strikes against alleged drug traffickers in Latin America — and is not bound by a decades-old law requiring Congress to give approval for ongoing hostilities.
November 2, 2025 at 7:33 AM
The sheer naivete of someone acknowledging they are looking down the barrel of an authoritarian dictatorship, and *still* thinking the solution is "...just VOTE BLUE..." is absolutely mind boggling.
If you can't accept that more extreme resistance is now required, you are a liability, not an ally.
If you can't accept that more extreme resistance is now required, you are a liability, not an ally.
A few historical examples of your kind of "big tent" approach you might want to look into: The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, Anglo-German Naval Agreement, the Munich Agreement, German-Polish Non-Aggression Pact, German-French Non-Agression Pact, the Havaara Transfer Agreement, and Operation Paperclip.
Folks demanding political / ideological purity fail to see that this is no longer a movement belonging to the left / liberals. This is an opposition against fascism. By definition it must be big tent. Failure to grasp this: see divided oppositions in Eastern Europe as your failed examples.
October 20, 2025 at 8:03 PM
A few historical examples of your kind of "big tent" approach you might want to look into: The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, Anglo-German Naval Agreement, the Munich Agreement, German-Polish Non-Aggression Pact, German-French Non-Agression Pact, the Havaara Transfer Agreement, and Operation Paperclip.
This demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of what Fascism is and how it comes to power.
American foreign and economic policy has actively suppressed anti-fascism both domestically and abroad; prefiguring and enabling our current situation since 1865. Yes, even under democratic presidents.
American foreign and economic policy has actively suppressed anti-fascism both domestically and abroad; prefiguring and enabling our current situation since 1865. Yes, even under democratic presidents.
Antifa is not a real organization. It's simply an acronym, a philosophy - it means anti-fascist.
And every American President - before the current one - has opposed fascism.
Let's take back our flag.
#ResistTrump
And every American President - before the current one - has opposed fascism.
Let's take back our flag.
#ResistTrump
October 20, 2025 at 1:29 PM
This demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of what Fascism is and how it comes to power.
American foreign and economic policy has actively suppressed anti-fascism both domestically and abroad; prefiguring and enabling our current situation since 1865. Yes, even under democratic presidents.
American foreign and economic policy has actively suppressed anti-fascism both domestically and abroad; prefiguring and enabling our current situation since 1865. Yes, even under democratic presidents.
This response is absolutely irrelevant to the point of the quoted skeet.
Who wins the primary doesn't matter when all the candidates suck; and the fact that the worst ones consistently win primaries only demonstrates how completely useless the Democrat party actually is.
Who wins the primary doesn't matter when all the candidates suck; and the fact that the worst ones consistently win primaries only demonstrates how completely useless the Democrat party actually is.
More dnc conspiracy bs. You sound like maga w/ their trump won in 2020 lies.
Millions of ppl vote in the presidential primary & each state runs their own primary. No one is forcing anyone to vote for a specific candidate to be the nominee. You just don’t like who they choose.
Millions of ppl vote in the presidential primary & each state runs their own primary. No one is forcing anyone to vote for a specific candidate to be the nominee. You just don’t like who they choose.
Has the DNC considered running a good candidate?
October 20, 2025 at 3:13 AM
This response is absolutely irrelevant to the point of the quoted skeet.
Who wins the primary doesn't matter when all the candidates suck; and the fact that the worst ones consistently win primaries only demonstrates how completely useless the Democrat party actually is.
Who wins the primary doesn't matter when all the candidates suck; and the fact that the worst ones consistently win primaries only demonstrates how completely useless the Democrat party actually is.
If "don't support a genocide" is an impossible standard, then what you have isn't worth saving. It isn't even worth trying to save.
October 18, 2025 at 11:43 PM
If "don't support a genocide" is an impossible standard, then what you have isn't worth saving. It isn't even worth trying to save.
Idk what's worse.
The fact that this fuckin' weirdo is trying to deconstruct these media to fit his predetermined narrative, the fact that he has done so in direct contradiction to the creator's own statements about their work, or the fact that he has the details of the work factually incorrect...
The fact that this fuckin' weirdo is trying to deconstruct these media to fit his predetermined narrative, the fact that he has done so in direct contradiction to the creator's own statements about their work, or the fact that he has the details of the work factually incorrect...
October 12, 2025 at 11:02 PM
Idk what's worse.
The fact that this fuckin' weirdo is trying to deconstruct these media to fit his predetermined narrative, the fact that he has done so in direct contradiction to the creator's own statements about their work, or the fact that he has the details of the work factually incorrect...
The fact that this fuckin' weirdo is trying to deconstruct these media to fit his predetermined narrative, the fact that he has done so in direct contradiction to the creator's own statements about their work, or the fact that he has the details of the work factually incorrect...
If you see this QRP with a game that released the year you were born.
October 12, 2025 at 10:57 PM
If you see this QRP with a game that released the year you were born.
Reposted by Antifáwen /Ï\🍄🧙♂️
Testing a theory:
reskeet if "every ICE agent will be unmasked and tried for their crimes" would get your vote
reskeet if "every ICE agent will be unmasked and tried for their crimes" would get your vote
CAN I GET A 'FUCK ICE' IN CHAT
ICE is only as old as the Kangaroo Jack movie and neither needed to exist
September 20, 2025 at 9:38 AM
Testing a theory:
reskeet if "every ICE agent will be unmasked and tried for their crimes" would get your vote
reskeet if "every ICE agent will be unmasked and tried for their crimes" would get your vote
Maybe don't willfully sobotage your actual current support if you're actually trying to take back the government.
October 8, 2025 at 4:59 PM
Maybe don't willfully sobotage your actual current support if you're actually trying to take back the government.
It's painfully obvious you haven't spent much time in anarchist spaces online.
@infernatrix isn't just an internet rando; they are one of the most active, ideologically grounded, and well-read anarchists on this platform.
If they are calling you out, it's worth taking the time to understand why.
@infernatrix isn't just an internet rando; they are one of the most active, ideologically grounded, and well-read anarchists on this platform.
If they are calling you out, it's worth taking the time to understand why.
Sorry for typos. But I don't blame anyone else for wanting to associate with others that align with their own values. But I won't let some random strangers on the internet determine my beliefs and who I am as an individual. That with goes against my uniqueness and authenticity.
October 7, 2025 at 11:58 PM
It's painfully obvious you haven't spent much time in anarchist spaces online.
@infernatrix isn't just an internet rando; they are one of the most active, ideologically grounded, and well-read anarchists on this platform.
If they are calling you out, it's worth taking the time to understand why.
@infernatrix isn't just an internet rando; they are one of the most active, ideologically grounded, and well-read anarchists on this platform.
If they are calling you out, it's worth taking the time to understand why.
Nah. Any activist absolutely gets to decide who aligns with them; anarchists in particular.
If you want to know why go read up on Nestor Makhno or the fate of Anarchists in the Spanish Civil War.
If you want to know why go read up on Nestor Makhno or the fate of Anarchists in the Spanish Civil War.
It's genuinely not your place to decide who is an Anarchist. That is ridiculous.
October 7, 2025 at 7:55 PM
Nah. Any activist absolutely gets to decide who aligns with them; anarchists in particular.
If you want to know why go read up on Nestor Makhno or the fate of Anarchists in the Spanish Civil War.
If you want to know why go read up on Nestor Makhno or the fate of Anarchists in the Spanish Civil War.
This person is a fed.
It's literally in their bio.
It's literally in their bio.
We’re in a moment now where it would be worth people taking three hours to watch Gandhi, particularly the scene of the salt march. There is value to making the brutality of your opponent so plain as day that no one can argue with it. The clarity of that brought down an empire
October 7, 2025 at 7:12 PM
This person is a fed.
It's literally in their bio.
It's literally in their bio.
No, you don't.
Your system pre-figures both class heirarchies and institutional government.
Which are both conditions diametrically opposed to historical (and modern) anarchist positions.
Your system pre-figures both class heirarchies and institutional government.
Which are both conditions diametrically opposed to historical (and modern) anarchist positions.
I understand the Historical Anarchists position, and I don't disagree with it. But when I use the term Direct Democracy, I'm simply describing the one of many consensus we can use to achieve Anarchism. I am advocating for workers control of how we govern society, not through institutions of State.
Nah
October 6, 2025 at 5:19 PM
No, you don't.
Your system pre-figures both class heirarchies and institutional government.
Which are both conditions diametrically opposed to historical (and modern) anarchist positions.
Your system pre-figures both class heirarchies and institutional government.
Which are both conditions diametrically opposed to historical (and modern) anarchist positions.
Breaking news: 80% of surveyed experts are actually stupid.
Has Trump’s second term posed a greater or lesser threat to the rule of law than you expected? @nytimes.com
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/06/m...
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/06/m...
October 6, 2025 at 4:50 PM
Breaking news: 80% of surveyed experts are actually stupid.
The funniest part is how you still blame them when you keep losing.
One of the underrated funniest demographics is “people who aren’t going to vote for the Democrat regardless but for some reason think their views on Democratic politicking should be valued”
October 6, 2025 at 4:47 PM
The funniest part is how you still blame them when you keep losing.
Freud would have a field day with modern politics.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) made an apparent blunder on camera Tuesday when he said Republicans and Democrats should come together and "stop attacking pedophiles.
'Stop attacking pedophiles!' Ted Cruz appears to make awkward gaffe during Senate hearing
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) made an apparent blunder on camera Tuesday when he said Republicans and Democrats should come together and "stop attacking pedophiles."Cruz was speaking at a Senate hearing on Trump administration actions to address crime when he attempted to convey how bipartisan efforts in Con...
bit.ly
October 1, 2025 at 2:57 AM
Freud would have a field day with modern politics.
I'm so anti-ICE that all my drinks are room temperature...
September 29, 2025 at 2:23 AM
I'm so anti-ICE that all my drinks are room temperature...
21 Mech Pilots.
Railguns 'n' Roses.
Combat Boot.
Starnuke.
U235.
Railguns 'n' Roses.
Combat Boot.
Starnuke.
U235.
Technologically advance a band:
U3.1415927
U3.1415927
Queens of the Bronze Age
September 22, 2025 at 12:14 AM
21 Mech Pilots.
Railguns 'n' Roses.
Combat Boot.
Starnuke.
U235.
Railguns 'n' Roses.
Combat Boot.
Starnuke.
U235.
I keep thinking about yesterday and smiling :)
September 11, 2025 at 7:58 PM
I keep thinking about yesterday and smiling :)
Something for my atmospheric science nerds, astrology peeps, and celestial mages.
My backyard tonight:
My backyard tonight:
September 8, 2025 at 6:49 AM
Something for my atmospheric science nerds, astrology peeps, and celestial mages.
My backyard tonight:
My backyard tonight:
Why would I fight for a party that has vehemently refused to fight for the rights of my friends and family?
Not only refused, but actively undermined those actually fighting, and repeatedly doubled down on complicity.
If you want fighters, give us something worth fighting for;
cuz Big Tent ain't it.
Not only refused, but actively undermined those actually fighting, and repeatedly doubled down on complicity.
If you want fighters, give us something worth fighting for;
cuz Big Tent ain't it.
August 25, 2025 at 7:29 AM
Why would I fight for a party that has vehemently refused to fight for the rights of my friends and family?
Not only refused, but actively undermined those actually fighting, and repeatedly doubled down on complicity.
If you want fighters, give us something worth fighting for;
cuz Big Tent ain't it.
Not only refused, but actively undermined those actually fighting, and repeatedly doubled down on complicity.
If you want fighters, give us something worth fighting for;
cuz Big Tent ain't it.
Read it twice.
Still fucking stupid.
Any compromise on trans rights is an automatic fail. If this is the best you can do for 2028 that's a hard pass.
Still fucking stupid.
Any compromise on trans rights is an automatic fail. If this is the best you can do for 2028 that's a hard pass.
Trans community,
Read this twice.
We support you. We do.
Now vote for people who don't want you to go to camps and become slave labor.
Watching you all cry about Newsom is laughable. The man is trolling Trump and nothing more
Please grow the hell up. I'm begging you.
Read this twice.
We support you. We do.
Now vote for people who don't want you to go to camps and become slave labor.
Watching you all cry about Newsom is laughable. The man is trolling Trump and nothing more
Please grow the hell up. I'm begging you.
August 22, 2025 at 5:17 PM
Read it twice.
Still fucking stupid.
Any compromise on trans rights is an automatic fail. If this is the best you can do for 2028 that's a hard pass.
Still fucking stupid.
Any compromise on trans rights is an automatic fail. If this is the best you can do for 2028 that's a hard pass.