Tomi Tee
banner
tomitee.bsky.social
Tomi Tee
@tomitee.bsky.social
Wanderer.

I do the artings and the writings.
Pinned
The chips staled long ago, and the jerky has turned. It’s quieter now that the sun has fallen. I nabbed a piece of charred kindling. Maybe I’ll draw again when the light comes back.

#flashfiction #sketchbook
Reposted by Tomi Tee
Prime Minister Carney, in Davos:

“You cannot live within the lie of mutual benefit through integration, when integration becomes the source of your subordination.”

President Trump, this morning:
January 24, 2026 at 2:26 PM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
CNN: DHS officials have come to FEMA staff and told them to limit the use of the word ice…they are worried that by posting something like, watch out for the ice, that it's going to become a meme….
January 24, 2026 at 12:07 AM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
This is what secret police do and repressive regimes.
January 24, 2026 at 3:48 AM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
Two women trained as first responders were abducted by three ICE agents. One of the agents starts seizing. The other two don’t know what to do. The women jump into action and save the agent’s life, only to be re-handcuffed and processed.

www.startribune.com/detained-by-...
Detained by ICE, two women became first responders during agent’s seizure
The women say they guided agents through the emergency, later raising concerns about medical protocols, weapons safety and accountability.
www.startribune.com
January 23, 2026 at 11:47 PM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
Cannot see the end of it.
January 23, 2026 at 9:06 PM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
this photo. minneapolis. 💜

📷️ Alex Kormann/Star Tribune
January 23, 2026 at 10:04 PM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
Breaking NYT:

The FBI agent who sought to investigate the federal immigration officer who fatally shot Renee Good has resigned from the bureau, according to two people familiar with the matter, after leadership pressured her to discontinue a civil rights inquiry into the officer.
F.B.I. Agent Who Tried to Investigate ICE Officer in Shooting Resigns
www.nytimes.com
January 23, 2026 at 11:15 PM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
Learn more about why ICE’s new policy that lets agents enter your home without a judicial warrant is dead wrong. joycevance.substack.com/p/breaking-t...
January 23, 2026 at 2:21 PM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
One day, if we are lucky, the erasure of American history will itself be remembered as a shameful chapter in American history
January 23, 2026 at 1:30 AM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
Nasra Ahmed, a 23-year-old US citizen, was arrested and detained by ICE. She was held for TWO DAYS.

ICE agents handcuffed her, called her a racial slur, and she was knocked to the ground so hard she got a concussion.

This cannot continue happening. ICE needs to leave.
January 22, 2026 at 1:42 AM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
Really would like even a single major newspaper or TV media outlet to lead with this when discussing everything related to Trump and Greenland.
Threatening allies is a violation of the NATO treaty. Which makes it a violation of federal law.
Performative public lying is a hallmark of far right authoritarian parties

A TACO truck on every corner in Nuuk & Brussels

He should still be immediately impeached & removed for even threatening this stuff with our NATO allies.
January 22, 2026 at 3:02 AM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
The House Ethics Committee found that Matt Gaetz did all of the horrible things previously claimed—sex trafficking minors, prostitution (including of minors), drugs, drunk driving, obstruction, the works. The Florida Bulldog has secured and published the House report this evening.
January 22, 2026 at 3:45 AM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
VOA's headquarters, 'the Sistine Chapel of the New Deal,' faces possible destruction as part of the Trump administration's drive for "maximum value for the federal real estate footprint." wapo.st/4a5NCsq
The stunning art trove hidden in a D.C. building marked by Trump for disposal
Packed with frescoes, paintings and reliefs, the federal government’s Cohen Building has been called “the Sistine Chapel of the New Deal.” Advocates fear these works could be at risk.
wapo.st
January 22, 2026 at 2:07 PM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
This is 100% FALSE. Immigration judges do NOT play any role in issuing administrative warrants. They are generated and signed by ICE officers themselves. ICE’s own training materials say they can’t be used for a search of a home!

Here’s a blank warrant form. Note who signs it.
January 22, 2026 at 8:05 PM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
AYFKM. One of the guys ICE/DHS claimed was living with the innocent US citizen they dragged into the snow in his underwear is currently IN PRISON and already had an ICE detainer on him.

It's amateur hour at ICE, and the rights of American citizens are being impacted!
January 23, 2026 at 12:01 AM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
That is an ICE agent pepper spraying a restrained victim in the face at close quarters; it's an unquestionable and indefensibly abusive use of excessive force that should (but won't) be criminally prosecuted as assault
An observer arrested in Suth Minneapolis. Photo by Richard Tsong-Taatarii/The Minnesota Star Tribune
January 21, 2026 at 10:15 PM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
Trump: "Sometimes you need a dictator."
January 21, 2026 at 6:00 PM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
I try to avoid hyperbole when it comes to Trump policies, but this is absolutely frickin’ insane—on about eleventy different levels.

Massive, systemic Fourth Amendment violations because … reasons.
ICE secretly told its officers that any time someone has been ordered removed, ICE can break down their door.

It has been accepted for generations that the only thing which can authorize agents to break into your home is a warrant signed by a judge. No wonder ICE hid this memo!
January 21, 2026 at 10:28 PM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
January 22, 2026 at 3:46 AM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
Everyone: Judges have ruled several times that the President has broken the law. Do you support impeachment?

House Leader: Yes...

Everyone: Oh, okay...

House Leader: ....of the judges.
‘I’m for it’: Johnson endorses impeachment for judges who rule against Trump
‘I’m for it’: Johnson endorses impeachment for judges who rule against Trump
The speaker was previously cool to the conservative push to oust judges who rule against the administration. Speaker Mike Johnson now supports the push inside his party to bring impeachment articles against judges perceived as antagonistic of President Donald Trump’s agenda — a notable shift for the Louisiana Republican who over the summer sought to squelch such effort. “I’m for it,” Johnson told reporters at his weekly news conference Wednesday, responding to the question of whether he would endorse impeaching judges who have ruled against the administration. A symbol of this ongoing effort has been James Boasberg, a U.S. district judge who ruled last year that the Trump administration’s abrupt deportation of 137 men violated their due process rights and defied court orders to keep them in U.S. custody. Trump allies and Hill conservatives have argued Boasberg is an activist who ought to be ousted from the bench. Johnson, over the summer, tried to tamp down the enthusiasm among hard-liners to remove him. But judicial impeachment cries among House and Senate Republicans have flared up again in recent weeks. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has written to Johnson urging him to take up impeachment proceedings against Boasberg, while the Judiciary committees of both chambers have held hearings on the matter broadly. Judicial activist Mike Davis also spoke with the Republican Study Committee earlier this month about the mechanics of impeaching Boasberg. Though he acknowledged that the party does not have the votes to impeach or remove Boasberg or others, Davis advised lawmakers to put the judge through the process as a punishment. Johnson also acknowledged Wednesday that “impeachment” would be “an extreme measure” and “we’ll see where it goes.” He added, however, that “some of these judges have gotten so far outside the bounds of where they’re supposed to operate [that] it would not be, in my view, a bad thing for Congress to lay down the law, so to speak, and … make an example of some of the egregious abuses.” Lead Art: House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) speaks during a press conference on Capitol Hill Jan. 21, 2026. (Francis Chung/POLITICO via AP Images) | AP
dlvr.it
January 22, 2026 at 7:57 AM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
Special Counsel Jack Smith in his Opening Remarks:
January 22, 2026 at 3:44 PM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
Q: Did you uncover evidence to prove Trump knew his claim the election was stolen was false?

SMITH: Yes

Q: And Trump claimed it was stolen while he privately acknowledged he lost?

SMITH: Yes

Q: Yet on the 5th anniversary of J6, Trump still promoted the stolen election theory on a govt webpage
January 22, 2026 at 5:16 PM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
Jack Smith: "The people who assaulted police officers and were convicted after trial in my view and I think in the view of the judges who sentenced them to prison are dangerous to their community. Some of these people have already committed crimes against their communities again."
January 22, 2026 at 7:19 PM
Reposted by Tomi Tee
Dawg
January 22, 2026 at 4:02 PM