A Doll In Every Pot
@tobellz.bsky.social
NEVER AGAIN MEANS NEVER AGAIN
He's bad. Everyone sees it now, right?
also on fedi (https://hachyderm.io/@tob)
He's bad. Everyone sees it now, right?
also on fedi (https://hachyderm.io/@tob)
Pinned
A Doll In Every Pot
@tobellz.bsky.social
· May 21
The 2024 Data Don't Lie:
The only issue voters can clearly associate with the modern D Party is support for gay rights.
That's it.
Voters are 50/50 on which party is on SS and Medicare.
Yes, really.
That's why we need to leave pound them on the economy and critical programs like Medicaid.
The only issue voters can clearly associate with the modern D Party is support for gay rights.
That's it.
Voters are 50/50 on which party is on SS and Medicare.
Yes, really.
That's why we need to leave pound them on the economy and critical programs like Medicaid.
Just gonna show this chart to everyone that complains about Joe Biden not dropping out soon enough or whatever.
America is a country full of obnoxious dipshits that have very strong opinions about things they know absolutely nothing about.
America is a country full of obnoxious dipshits that have very strong opinions about things they know absolutely nothing about.
Reposted by A Doll In Every Pot
every fascist intellectual is nothing more than an adolescent pseud with faux gravitas whose output is sophomoric fanfiction the sole purpose of which is to rationalize fascist barbarism
January 6, 2026 at 4:31 PM
every fascist intellectual is nothing more than an adolescent pseud with faux gravitas whose output is sophomoric fanfiction the sole purpose of which is to rationalize fascist barbarism
The reason is that the people who bridle under that order are puppeteering our dying old man President.
It’s genuinely wild that the United States spent decades building an elaborate rules-based international order which de facto cemented its permanent status as the dominant global hegemon, sustained by ideology rather than might, and now is just blowing it all up for literally no reason
January 6, 2026 at 4:29 AM
The reason is that the people who bridle under that order are puppeteering our dying old man President.
Reposted by A Doll In Every Pot
The first year of Trump’s second term has done significantly more damage to our position on the world stage than all four of his first put together.
It’s genuinely wild that the United States spent decades building an elaborate rules-based international order which de facto cemented its permanent status as the dominant global hegemon, sustained by ideology rather than might, and now is just blowing it all up for literally no reason
January 6, 2026 at 3:54 AM
The first year of Trump’s second term has done significantly more damage to our position on the world stage than all four of his first put together.
Reposted by A Doll In Every Pot
This website when Jeffries says something they don’t like: fuck you
This website when Jeffries says something they like: fuck you
This website when Jeffries says something they like: fuck you
Jeffries: "The Constitution isn't a matter of inconvenience. It is a requirement. George Washington in his farewell address to the nation made clear that the Constitution is sacredly obligatory upon all. That means everybody. There is no Trump exception."
January 5, 2026 at 10:39 PM
This website when Jeffries says something they don’t like: fuck you
This website when Jeffries says something they like: fuck you
This website when Jeffries says something they like: fuck you
Reposted by A Doll In Every Pot
War game in the style of Papers, Please
You're a staff officer charged with wrangling NCOs, processing (possibly faulty) intelligence, and managing requisition requests for more ammunition (there is no 155mm in this sector, they gave us drones that don't work)
You're a staff officer charged with wrangling NCOs, processing (possibly faulty) intelligence, and managing requisition requests for more ammunition (there is no 155mm in this sector, they gave us drones that don't work)
leaning into something that includes more of the drudgery of military life from a role-playing perspective and has less emphasis on twitch action violence could possibly reinvigorate it
January 5, 2026 at 8:33 PM
War game in the style of Papers, Please
You're a staff officer charged with wrangling NCOs, processing (possibly faulty) intelligence, and managing requisition requests for more ammunition (there is no 155mm in this sector, they gave us drones that don't work)
You're a staff officer charged with wrangling NCOs, processing (possibly faulty) intelligence, and managing requisition requests for more ammunition (there is no 155mm in this sector, they gave us drones that don't work)
Asked and answered.
January 5, 2026 at 9:23 PM
Asked and answered.
Reposted by A Doll In Every Pot
While true, it doesn't go very far. Trump's "run the clock" strategy fails miserably absent the (er) timely intervention of the Roberts Supreme Court.
A big part of why we find ourselves in this predicament is that the Biden administration was so terrified of anything that might be *perceived* as political retribution that they treated obvious criminals with kid gloves and slow-walked the process to the point that Trump was able to run the clock.
It's also a reminder of what *should* have happened to Mike Flynn, who should have been stripped of his rank and tried under UCMJ guidelines.
But only one party is concerned with "looking political."
But only one party is concerned with "looking political."
January 5, 2026 at 8:44 PM
While true, it doesn't go very far. Trump's "run the clock" strategy fails miserably absent the (er) timely intervention of the Roberts Supreme Court.
Reposted by A Doll In Every Pot
we need a new rawlsian thought experiment but this one needs to be a thought experiment about "could you explain this action or post to a normal person on the street"
I still don’t understand Stancil and I don’t know anyone irl who even knows who he is. That’s all I need to know that he is probably some toxic, weirdly online phenomenon that I should avoid at all costs
January 5, 2026 at 8:25 PM
we need a new rawlsian thought experiment but this one needs to be a thought experiment about "could you explain this action or post to a normal person on the street"
Reposted by A Doll In Every Pot
Good piece focusing on a neglected demographic but I am also unconvinced young men are radicalising right in the way claimed
Young women are radicalising
🖊️ Scarlett Maguire
🖊️ Scarlett Maguire
Young women are radicalising
Britain's young women are sad, alienated and increasingly left-wing
www.newstatesman.com
January 5, 2026 at 7:03 PM
Good piece focusing on a neglected demographic but I am also unconvinced young men are radicalising right in the way claimed
Pete Hegseth wants desperately to be ruled by Mark Kelly.
Four generations of my family have served our country. Service is in my blood. The President wouldn’t know anything about that.
January 5, 2026 at 8:02 PM
Pete Hegseth wants desperately to be ruled by Mark Kelly.
Reposted by A Doll In Every Pot
Four generations of my family have served our country. Service is in my blood. The President wouldn’t know anything about that.
January 5, 2026 at 6:24 PM
Four generations of my family have served our country. Service is in my blood. The President wouldn’t know anything about that.
Reposted by A Doll In Every Pot
I mean this is the central problem in politics?
The coalition for "I hate this, let's burn it all down" is usually larger than any constructive coalition.
The coalition for "I hate this, let's burn it all down" is usually larger than any constructive coalition.
January 4, 2026 at 10:33 PM
I mean this is the central problem in politics?
The coalition for "I hate this, let's burn it all down" is usually larger than any constructive coalition.
The coalition for "I hate this, let's burn it all down" is usually larger than any constructive coalition.
Reposted by A Doll In Every Pot
It’s time for today’s game of “is this appalling thing the President just said even true or is it just a neuron misfire or a manifestation of his pathological need just to say whatever shit he thinks will make him look cool and tough”
January 5, 2026 at 5:34 PM
It’s time for today’s game of “is this appalling thing the President just said even true or is it just a neuron misfire or a manifestation of his pathological need just to say whatever shit he thinks will make him look cool and tough”
Reposted by A Doll In Every Pot
“If I had seen Tim Walz saying ‘weird’ in my feed more often later in the campaign he’d be cruising to reelection.”
-The Bluesky Solipsist’s Lament
-The Bluesky Solipsist’s Lament
January 5, 2026 at 5:29 PM
“If I had seen Tim Walz saying ‘weird’ in my feed more often later in the campaign he’d be cruising to reelection.”
-The Bluesky Solipsist’s Lament
-The Bluesky Solipsist’s Lament
Reposted by A Doll In Every Pot
i don't know what to do about a system where people in power believe the antisemitic CSAM generator is too important of a platform to leave because the worst pundits on earth think the platform signals something about free speech
January 5, 2026 at 4:56 PM
i don't know what to do about a system where people in power believe the antisemitic CSAM generator is too important of a platform to leave because the worst pundits on earth think the platform signals something about free speech
Am I reading this right? Is the Secretary of Defense punishing a sitting Senator, Gulf War veteran, and astronaut having a letter put in his permanent file?
Hegseth is channeling the Principle from Ferris Beuler's Day Off
Hegseth is channeling the Principle from Ferris Beuler's Day Off
January 5, 2026 at 4:45 PM
Am I reading this right? Is the Secretary of Defense punishing a sitting Senator, Gulf War veteran, and astronaut having a letter put in his permanent file?
Hegseth is channeling the Principle from Ferris Beuler's Day Off
Hegseth is channeling the Principle from Ferris Beuler's Day Off
The "Noriega Precedent" is actually:
Allowing the President of the United States to do crazy bullshit to a guy no one likes is bad, actually.
Allowing the President of the United States to do crazy bullshit to a guy no one likes is bad, actually.
January 5, 2026 at 4:27 PM
The "Noriega Precedent" is actually:
Allowing the President of the United States to do crazy bullshit to a guy no one likes is bad, actually.
Allowing the President of the United States to do crazy bullshit to a guy no one likes is bad, actually.
Can we please *please* start talking openly about how bizarre and clownish this vain self-obsessed pudding-brained asshole looks?
New in PN: Trump's Venezuela coup sends America down a dark path
"As Elizabeth Saunders said, 'we have the foreign policy of a personalist dictatorship' — and the dictator’s preference is watching TV shows in which the military blows things up at his whim. What could go wrong? We’ll soon find out."
"As Elizabeth Saunders said, 'we have the foreign policy of a personalist dictatorship' — and the dictator’s preference is watching TV shows in which the military blows things up at his whim. What could go wrong? We’ll soon find out."
Trump's Venezuela coup sends America down a dark path
He got a taste of violence and clearly wants more.
www.publicnotice.co
January 5, 2026 at 3:30 PM
Can we please *please* start talking openly about how bizarre and clownish this vain self-obsessed pudding-brained asshole looks?
Reposted by A Doll In Every Pot
okay so here's a different graph that is interesting. if we look at negative sentiment posts by the age of the account, there is a significant uptick in negative sentiment posts coming from "elder" accounts. this chart here is looking at the past 3 days.
January 4, 2026 at 8:33 PM
okay so here's a different graph that is interesting. if we look at negative sentiment posts by the age of the account, there is a significant uptick in negative sentiment posts coming from "elder" accounts. this chart here is looking at the past 3 days.
Reposted by A Doll In Every Pot
Instagram: Here’s the first half of something funny that dril posted, do you want to see it?
[Click]
Splash page: Welcome to the wonderful world of Threads. Get ready to download the app and find out what all your favorite Threadsters are saying.
Me: No. Fuck. Fuck!!
[Click]
Splash page: Welcome to the wonderful world of Threads. Get ready to download the app and find out what all your favorite Threadsters are saying.
Me: No. Fuck. Fuck!!
January 5, 2026 at 4:46 AM
Instagram: Here’s the first half of something funny that dril posted, do you want to see it?
[Click]
Splash page: Welcome to the wonderful world of Threads. Get ready to download the app and find out what all your favorite Threadsters are saying.
Me: No. Fuck. Fuck!!
[Click]
Splash page: Welcome to the wonderful world of Threads. Get ready to download the app and find out what all your favorite Threadsters are saying.
Me: No. Fuck. Fuck!!
Reposted by A Doll In Every Pot
The Epstein Files Transparency Act is a law, passed by Congress on November 19 with an overwhelming vote. Complying with it was not optional. The Department of Justice did not comply.
I want to make sure this is very clear.
I want to make sure this is very clear.
January 4, 2026 at 6:18 PM
The Epstein Files Transparency Act is a law, passed by Congress on November 19 with an overwhelming vote. Complying with it was not optional. The Department of Justice did not comply.
I want to make sure this is very clear.
I want to make sure this is very clear.
Reposted by A Doll In Every Pot
Reposted by A Doll In Every Pot
Can't help but feel like this is one of the reasons why the Constitution says If a dude in office does an insurrection, don't let that motherfucker hold office again
Bc clearly they cannot be trusted with power & control over the levers of government, & they do not care about democratic constraints
Bc clearly they cannot be trusted with power & control over the levers of government, & they do not care about democratic constraints
January 3, 2026 at 2:31 PM
Can't help but feel like this is one of the reasons why the Constitution says If a dude in office does an insurrection, don't let that motherfucker hold office again
Bc clearly they cannot be trusted with power & control over the levers of government, & they do not care about democratic constraints
Bc clearly they cannot be trusted with power & control over the levers of government, & they do not care about democratic constraints
Reposted by A Doll In Every Pot
They’re against democratic legitimacy, which is premium-grade legitimacy; but they’re against nationalist legitimacy, communist legitimacy and even royalist legitimacy. They want to rule unaccountably, and they are opposed to any theory that could hold them to account.
January 3, 2026 at 11:15 PM
They’re against democratic legitimacy, which is premium-grade legitimacy; but they’re against nationalist legitimacy, communist legitimacy and even royalist legitimacy. They want to rule unaccountably, and they are opposed to any theory that could hold them to account.